lvandeve/lodepng — pull request #2 by slowriot (2014-11-27 05:32:05+00:00)
Title: Bug fix for previous erroneous pull request, plus further optimisation

I found and resolved the issue that caused my previous untested pull request to fail (10bb7ca). I realise you said that your choice of post-increment and less-than comparison is a matter of style, but I've now benchmarked this fork against the original, and I consistently get runtimes taking 97% the time of the original to carry out the unit test (timed in batches of 100), both at optimisation levels -O0 and -O3, meaning these changes represent an approximately 3% speedup even with optimisation.

Not all of the changes will affect performance (mostly the loop comparisons will), so feel free to merge only part of this if you really feel strongly about keeping post-increments, although I personally think it's a matter of good style to prefer post-increment in all cases when working with C++ on principle.