CrossEye/ramda — pull request #440 by davidchambers (2014-10-09 15:21:23+00:00)
Title: introduce requiresArg decorator

Opening for discussion. I'm not sure this is an improvement.

Pros:

- declarative
- could be applied throughout the module, at which point `noArgsException` could be removed

Cons:

- stack traces report "incorrect" line
- performance penalty if applied throughout the module

Having organized my thoughts, I don't think this is a good idea, but I'll open a pull request anyway as the ensuing discussion may be fruitful.