Metaswitch/sprout — pull request #535 by mike-evans (2014-05-07 12:13:05+00:00)
Title: Reviewer Andy: Remove extra AVPs from I-CSCF and BGCF ACRs

Andy

Can you review my fix to https://github.com/Metaswitch/sprout/issues/500. This should be along the lines of what we discussed last night, although when coding I found a few other cases where we were including AVPs in cases we shouldn't. I've tested the main issues by adding a UT case for I-CSCF REGISTER handling.

I decided to leave the Server-Capabilities AVP in the final ACR reported by the I-CSCF as it feels like this is useful and not confusing.

Mike