brucemiller/LaTeXML — pull request #24 by dginev (2013-12-08 21:50:43+00:00)
Title:  More robust testing when kpsewhich isn't present

Don't merge this pull request just yet.

For now, I made the Test checks for requirements more robust to installations where kpsewhich isn't installed.

There is still the task of making sure pathname_find is always used when kpsewhich isn't presented, and a number of the test cases need to explicitly state requirements - e.g. expansion/meaning needs fontenc, which in turn requires t1enc.def installed on the machine. So that needs to be made skippable, somehow.