pivotal/jasmine — pull request #388 by sheelc (2013-06-17 05:31:42+00:00)
Title: Have Jasmine HTML use the source files in specs

Similar to the changes in Jasmine core and console, this gets the
HTML parts of Jasmine using j$ instead of jasmine for more clarity
around what's being tested.

Any thoughts on using `j$.version` instead of `jasmine.version`? I went with j$ as it's consistent and seemed more correct, but because it hasn't gone through concatenation, `j$.version` in the spec files is the literal string `"<%= version %>"` (which is why the spec had to use innerText/textContent instead of innerHTML).