astropy/coordinates-benchmark — pull request #15 by astrofrog (2012-12-03 14:12:15+00:00)
Title: Updated astropy script and results

This updates the Astropy script to the latest version of @eteq's fork in astropy/astropy#471. Surprisingly, the results now agree very well with other packages even though astropy.coordinates doesn't yet include e-terms. So either the effect of the e-terms is small, or other packages do not include then by default.

I've been working on trying to implement the e-terms, but I need to wait for a bug with the transform graph to be fixed before it will work correctly, so I can't properly check the magnitude of the difference.

@cdeil - can you double check whether you get the same results with the latest version of ``astropy.coordinates`` from @eteq's fork?