evanmiller/tinymq — pull request #3 by prof3ta (2012-08-31 08:04:36+00:00)
Title: OTP-ify tinymq application.

* Implement application behaviour
* Use env variable for newage parameter
* Utilize simple_one_for_one supervisor

According to the current implementation, the controller acts as some sort of "supervisor" for the channel_sup. A channel_sup is created for each channel. Is this intentional? Wouldn't it make sense to have a sub-tree with one channel sup and several channel?