cplusplus/draft — pull request #22 by jwakely (2012-06-24 18:22:38+00:00)
Title: Editorial(?) changes in [conversions]

The types byte_string and wide_string should be in a fixed-width typeface.

Codecvt is not a template, so Codecvt is ill-formed, it should be just Codecvt (same problem in [conversions.string] and [conversions.buffer].)

The example in [conversions.string] supposes the existence of some facet called codecvt_utf8, which is in the standard library now so there's no need to word it that way. Just use std::codecvt_utf8.

http://cplusplus.github.com/LWG/lwg-defects.html#991 changed the string types to use allcoators, but didn't update the definitions so they don't match the class synopsis (are those definitions even necessary? They don't add anything that isn't already defined in the class definition in paragraph 2).

There are also lots of redundant std:: qualifications in that clause, which I didn't remove to keep the patch simpler.

If any of these doesn't qualify as editorial changes let me know and I'll request LWG issues and send a new pull request without those parts.