amishHammer/NanoBSD-NG — pull request #3 by ocochard (2012-03-07 16:41:42+00:00)
Title: Merging nanobsd from 9.0 to NanoBSD-NG and fix updatep1 script

There are lot's of changes, I've tested an image generation (default) and update it without problem.
nanobsd from 9.0 use a unique label name:
- LABELs1a: First system slice
- LABELs2a: Second system slice
- LABELs3: Configuration slice
- LABELs4: Data slice

The updatep1 script was updated to:
After an upgrade, we need to change the label on the destination slice because the label included in the update image can be the wrong.