extend/cowboy — Issue #156: Cowboy Acceptor Pool
Author: ostinelli
Created: 2012-03-08 17:44:07+00:00
State: open

No issue here, just a desire to discuss on the [roadmap](https://github.com/extend/cowboy/blob/master/ROADMAP.md) ^^_

I see that all main points refer to the http server. My main needs right now, and one of the reasons why I've decided to gradually move from misultin to cowboy, is its native support for multiple protocols.

Thus my question. I don't see any planned work related to the acceptor pool itself: am I to understand that work in this area is mostly done, or simply that the accent has been set to the http server? I'd like to think of cowboy first of all to be *very* robust in handling multiple connection and implementing protocols (which was the original idea around it), and I hope it is not getting too 'distracted' by _one_ of the possible implementations (http).

Is this correct? @essen, thoughts?

r.