brighterplanet/lodging — Issue #3: Strange pool count threshold
Author: rossmeissl
Created: 2012-02-29 18:58:11+00:00
State: open

In the impact model we [have](https://github.com/brighterplanet/lodging/blob/master/lib/lodging/impact_model.rb#L310):

``` ruby
unless characteristics[:property].pools_indoor.nil?
[characteristics[:property].pools_indoor.to_f, 5].min
end
```

Where's this `5` coming from? If this is some way to guard against "99"s in the data, we should be fixing this in the DM block, not here. Impact models shouldn't have to worry about the validity of CM1's reference database.

@seamusabshere you could take this one too if you'd rather do it.