Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5 — Issue #6: thoughts about macro params
Author: pmario
Created: 2012-02-19 23:20:28+00:00
State: open

Some time ago, I did think about the "unnamed parameter" in your myMacro description.

```
<>
```

I do understand, that unnamed params are needed, for TW syntax compatibility reasons. What I'd like to see is eg:

1) `<>`
or
2) `<>`

At the moment, TW works like 1) which is compatibility mode. So the user has to know, that class is the second parameter. But I personally would prefer a "named params" only mode 2), which would make it possible that a slider macro works the first time I write it. No need to know the right order. eg:

```
<>
```

I hope this makes sense.