aL3xa/rapport — Issue #29: Towards flexible input type definition
Author: aL3xa
Created: 2012-01-15 16:34:31+00:00
State: open
Labels: feature, urgent

This one came to my mind while developing t-test template. It would be nice to provide more control to input definition. For example, if I'm about to specify `y` variable for `t.test` function, I'd like it to either be `factor` or `numeric`. Right now, it's not possible to add multiple rules in input definition field, but you can do that via `variable` convention, which will match "any" variable type (not to confuse with the `Any` type).