deephacks/tools4j — Issue #24: Is the name @Property confusing?
Author: emartgu
Created: 2012-01-07 22:16:15+00:00
State: open

A property in Java is in most places seen as a private member with corresponding getter and setter. Since a configurable field by nature in the runtime view must be seen as a read-only property I wonder if the name of the annotation is a good choice. My suggestion is to remove it and let it be replaced by reusing ```@Config``` which provides the same members.