ebroder/pyafs — Issue #3: License is poorly documented
Author: ebroder
Created: 2011-12-16 20:49:29+00:00
State: open

setup.py and debian/copyright in the debian branch mention that the project is licensed as GPL, but the package should really have a `COPYING` file, and the files in the project should have a standard license header.

I also can't find any evidence that I picked a specific variant of "GPL" and although I generally prefer GPLv2-no-plus, I should probably clear that with all past contributors.