justinethier/husk-scheme — Issue #60: let-syntax and R5RS pitfall 8.3
Author: justinethier
Created: 2011-11-25 03:43:26+00:00
State: open

The following test case from R5RS pitfalls fails, likely due to a deficiency in let-syntax:

(should-be 8.3 1
(let ((x 1))
(let-syntax ((foo (syntax-rules () ((_) 2))))
(define x (foo))
3)
x))