andrewkeller/REALbasic-Common-KFS-BSD — Issue #71: Unit Testing should have an Expectations engine of some sort
Author: andrewkeller
Created: 2011-11-21 20:10:55+00:00
State: open
Labels: new feature

So, I've been working on the dev-pgd branch, and it needs a simple expectations organizer. According to my memory, this is the second or third time expectations have been used in this library. This suggests that the Unit Testing Framework should support expectations at some level.

**Acceptance Criteria**

* Need to be able to add new expectations with custom key-value pairs
* Need to be able to satisfy an expectation with or without regard to order
* Need to be able to assert that all expectations have been satisfied

**Open Items**

* Should the UnitTestArbiterKFS class impose that expectations be local to a test case stage, or a whole test case?
* Should the UnitTestArbiterKFS class implicitly assert that all expectations have been satisfied at the conclusion of every ?