nandykins/-g-pl — Issue #10: OP function (aka main)
Author: nandykins
Created: 2011-11-02 23:42:50+00:00
State: open

As per the current draft, this would look something like

```
>implying OP isn't >function (
>implying x isn't 5
>implying y isn't 3

>mfw >+ x y
gb2

inane This will never execute:
>mfw "foobar"
)
```

How does that look? Also, I was thinking of renaming the >+ >* etc. functions to have names, eg. >plus >mul >div >sub >pow and so on. Of course, these aren't in the spec yet (see issue 9).