xmlgrrl/UMA-Specifications — Issue #37: Consider adding "ETags for scopes" to manage scope versioning
Author: xmlgrrl
Created: 2011-10-22 17:01:56+00:00
State: open

As discussed in UMA F2F 2011-10-20: http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/UMA+F2F+2011-10-20

At the end of Section 2.4.2: Do we need a way for the host to indicate to the AM that the latter needs to update its understanding of scope descriptions? Do we need the equivalent of "ETags for scopes"? Let's open an issue, and assign it to Paul.