kimmyg/Continuation-Mark-Monad — comment on commit 1595b41f3da3891e85e1cf36b7e63f6aa57b1483
File:  line 0
By kimmyg:

Agreed. In fact, what I made doesn't satisfy the monad laws. Now that I have correct behavior, I think I can refactor it as an actual monad. 10am?

----- Original Message -----
From: Jay McCarthy
To: kimmyg
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Continuation-Mark-Monad] Working monad? (1595b41)

I don't think the factorial functions should look inside the CM structure.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kimmyg/Continuation-Mark-Monad/commit/1595b41f3da3891e85e1cf36b7e63f6aa57b1483#commitcomment-1062593