TomGiordano/kernel_zte_blade — comment on commit f4c15a5f8363cbb5400445c2b43ea464b6930a18
File:  line 0
By Fagulhas:

Makes sense, thanks for the clarification Tom, very appreciated.

On 26 February 2012 11:49, Tom Giordano <
reply@reply.github.com
> wrote:

> blade is 6002 or 6102 I think. You could try backporting arcee's 2.6.35
> module to 2.6.32.
>
> The module provided by ZTE is compiled against the kernel source they
> provide, so it will load in kernels built with that source as long as all
> the related bits are configured correctly.
>
> On 26 February 2012 22:43, Ricardo Pinho <
> reply@reply.github.com
> > wrote:
>
> > It work well on the 2.6.35.x branch of the z71 kernel, but most use a
> > 2.6.32.x kernel because the .35 has problems with battery drains (around
> 3%
> > to 5% per hour). Blade uses AR6002 or the AR6003?
> >
> > I thought the source was needed to compile a module so we can link it to
> > the kernel so it actually loads it.
> >
> > ---
> > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/TomGiordano/kernel_zte_blade/commit/f4c15a5f8363cbb5400445c2b43ea464b6930a18#commitcomment-1012232
> >
>
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
>
> https://github.com/TomGiordano/kernel_zte_blade/commit/f4c15a5f8363cbb5400445c2b43ea464b6930a18#commitcomment-1012245
>