beanvalidation/beanvalidation.org — comment on commit bc37cfec514b79f7695ccb35f9990115c5fdeab8
File: proposals/BVAL-241.md line 553
By gunnarmorling:

> Also note that the design is consistent with `getConstraintsForClass`.

I think this is a different kind of thing. So far all `validateXy()` methods are defined on `Validator` and therefore I think also the method validation ones should be there.

> My idea was to let major methods on `Validator` and put minor ones behind an indirection.

That sounds good, I'd just say that the `validateXy()` methods are the major ones. Do you expect many more of those? +1 for introducing an indirection for other things.