maqetta/maqetta — comment on commit 578a27468179534294d614902b7475dfdb559609
File:  line 0
By JonFerraiolo:

Should we make a new bug to look at @jhpedemonte's comments above down the road (where maybe we can remove the setTimeout if we clean up other code), and leave existing logic in place for now?

But I will say that I don't see a problem with this particular setTimeout shown above. The setTimeout above shouldn't have dependencies where something is waiting on the logic within the setTimeout to happen, and can happen asynchronously sometime in the future.