ARCADE-UAV/mavlink — comment on commit e68429a2d98f8e9cae064f9818a5d3afe423829e
File:  line 0
By Susurrus:

Yeah, but the question is which is correct, MAVLink or QGC? I think QGC is actually correct here. It only makes sense to reuse the MAVLINK_TYPE_* enum. I think this patch is correct therefore.