konung/active_directory — comment on commit 2325f1875cc12fc363c1db4c8c8dda1bce00691c
File:  line 0
By konung:

Actually I think part of my confusion comes from the fact
that assistant field is implemented in AD 2003 as msExchAssistantName (
my production env) , but is "assitant" in 2000 ( my old testing env - I
know it is OLD)

Anyways this allowed for easier debugging. I can remove it if you want.

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:08 PM, nick gorbikoff wrote:

> Hi Richard.
> I'm implementing an internal app for hr, and some of the attributes that
> they need to access are: assistant and employeeid . They are not
> implemented as separate methods. Most likely cause they are not used a
> lot. So this allows for a quick access to those values without implementing
> a separate method. Maybe a more appropriate thing would be to make them
> attr_reader at this point to avoid screwing up the record accidentally.
>
> The proper solutions is of course to implement proper methods just like
> User.manager but who has time? :-) May be I'll do that and do another pull
> request in the future.
>
> Nick
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Richard Navarrete <
> reply@reply.github.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Nick,
>>
>> I haven't had a need for this - can you give me an example of how this is
>> useful for you?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> R
>>
>> ---
>> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
>>
>> https://github.com/konung/active_directory/commit/2325f1875cc12fc363c1db4c8c8dda1bce00691c#commitcomment-946679
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------
>
> Nick Gorbikoff
> nick.gorbikoff@gmail.com
>

--
--------------------------------------

Nick Gorbikoff
nick.gorbikoff@gmail.com