jbr/sibilant — comment on commit b89cbbb42faf619272707130cda0ab02c50de828
File:  line 0
By jbr:

The `(match? regex string)` regex used in this patch expands to `string.match(regex)`. Check out these lines in macros.sibilant:

```(defmacro match? (regexp string)
(macros.send string 'match regexp))
```

Is there an advantage to using `/regex/.test('string')` over `'string'.match(/regex/)` as was done in this patch? I've been away from a
computer for a while now, but I seem to remember them being equivalent since we don't need the captures or matches.