jacaetevha/sugarcrm — comment on commit 0636284e801a3aa191a0427f64e7caf2f1530e0a
File:  line 0
By jacaetevha:

There is no association for rt_communities. There is a
communities_builder in which both module and bean_name are empty
strings.

Is it that there is something amiss in the client's Sugar instance?
Perhaps they renamed the module? So your gem thinks there is an
RTCommunity and AbcBuilder module, but they are one in the same? I'm
just grasping at straws here.

Thanks a lot for the support. It's very kind of you!

--
Jason Rogers

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 21:30, Carl Hicks

wrote:
> Excellent, I should have said '''AbcBuilder''', sorry :)
>
> If you look at the output of "associations", and you search for a proxy_method that includes "community". You get something like this:
>
> #
>
> '''@target=false''', means that the gem doesn't know which module is associated with this class. This is probably because it wasn't provided in the module metadata we received from a '''get_module_fields''' call (we look for the module name in the "module" or "bean_name" entry of the returned metadata).
>
> Can you run:
>
> SugarCRM.connection.get_module_fields("AbcBuilders")
>
> And look for a line like:
>
> "rt_communities"=>
> {"name"=>"communities_builders",
> "type"=>"link",
> "relationship"=>"communities_builders",
> "module"=>"",
> "bean_name"=>""},
>
> Let me know if "module" and or "bean_name" are empty. If so, try editing the vardefs and adding the appropriate module name.
>
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/jacaetevha/sugarcrm/commit/0636284e801a3aa191a0427f64e7caf2f1530e0a#commitcomment-894694