nbourdau/libfreenect — comment on commit be6a043845dbeabce1ed98cf5c4023fce8659685
File: cmake_modules/Findlibusb-1.0.cmake line 64
By zarvox:

Is this liable to cause issues on systems where libusb-0.1 is installed? The usual pattern I see for having both installed is that libusb-0.1 is called "libusb.so", whereas libusb-1.0 is called "libusb-1.0.so"; will this line wind up finding and using libusb-0.1 if libusb-1.0 is not installed? What about when both are present? (Is libusb-1.0 called libusb.so on Debian kfreebsd?)

We might also have to figure something out for the Windows side, where we do ugly things to emulate libusb-1's API using libusb-win32 (which is a fork of libusb-0.1).