erlang/otp — comment on commit 38ee7a20cfdc22ead35b4711a086babcf6b3069b
File:  line 0
By kostis:

I do not understand this comment... Do you mean to say that you intentionally made a wrong change hoping that somebody will notice and correct it?

Anyway, the correct change is the one which is commented out but as the comment there says, declaring this type is currently problematic as there is a also another 3-tuple which is tagged by the atom 'function' which comes from another module and is used in the code of the module. This *really* confuses dialyzer so you will get bogus warnings if you add the correct types for this record.