mono/monodevelop — comment on commit 2a3044e4ef7c1188bfa7d6e90abdebba483462ca
File:  line 0
By mhutch:

@slluis: we didn't consider that setting, but please see the bug report.

The original code was wrong because it did not handle explicitly implemented interface members. Worse, it stripped off the interface name and added the class name, so what should have been displayed as
class Foo {
Bar;
IBar.Bar;
IBar.Bar;
}
would instead display as
class Foo {
Bar;
Bar (Foo);
Bar (Foo);
}

After removing the prefix stripping code, we thought the disambiguating code was redundant, so removed it too.