anall/dw-free — comment on commit 7e51c9c1987574ea3f96d2438d7d7fc04c42016a
File: cgi-bin/DW/Template/Plugin.pm line 128
By afuna:

Or hmm actually, how about dw.include instead of dw.scope_include / dw.scoped_include. I think that the dw is sufficient to make it look like "hey there's something dw-specific here", and it's not likely to be confused with plain old [% INCLUDE %] -- though we'll probably get some questions at some point asking what the difference is, but we can field those easily.

It also makes it likelier that people will use dw.include (shorter / easier to type and remember), which I judge is pretty reasonable, since anything that's going to be included will probably want its own .tt.text file