tiennou/extempore — comment on commit b27d0ee010204c6b7f258b631a35397154c9796d
File:  line 0
By tiennou:

Right ;-). That would be best.

Writing me got me wondering on the implications of a `sys:close-dylib` after the symbol is bound. I'm not sure it really is an error to re-`dlsym()` a symbol. But I guess the error is there to prevent double-registrations of the symbol in LLVM, right ?