lucmoreau/ProvToolbox — comment on commit d215c0ab9c42f9703c4515738ff6ad3e80d463c6
File: xml/src/main/resources/prov-20111110.xsd line 34
By lucmoreau:

Hi Satra,

yes, they should. I have added them.

prov-dm uses the term "attribute" in the broad sense, not with the
meaning adopted by XML.
So, when you say why 'type' is not an attribute? you mean an xml
attribute, right?

I don't think it can because multiple types are permitted, which you
can't have as xml attribute, i think.

Luc

On 06/12/11 19:02, Satrajit Ghosh wrote:
> shouldn't entity and agent have 'type' as well? and is there are reason why 'type' is not an attribute? it seemed from the reading of the model that prov:type and prov:role were predefined attributes.
>
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/lucmoreau/ProvToolbox/commit/d215c0ab9c42f9703c4515738ff6ad3e80d463c6#commitcomment-773443
>