burns/backup — comment on commit 0b273c75bbeb2e04f0a74de0f9ca5124eda61d2d
File: lib/backup/storage/object.rb line 39
By burns:

ok, I dropped that commit so I could pull those changes to the server
I'm using to test the backups in order to look into this. But, it seems
to be working fine now. So, whatever it was I must have fixed it :)

On 11/30/2011 09:12 PM, Michael van Rooijen wrote:
> Oh yeah, I had that earlier as well. The problem I had was that I had two 1.9.3's installed. 1.9.3-preview1 and 1.9.3p0.
> What I did was I uninstalled every 1.9.3 version except 1.9.3p0. Then I set 1.9.3p0 as default with rvm use 1.9.3p0 --default and then re-ran bundler to ensure everything was installed. After that it seemed to work. Not sure if you're using rvm btw, but my issue I think was that the --default was set to 1.9.3preview1 and not 1.9.3p0 or something. oh well!
>
> Just leave it out during development for now otherwise, I can cherry-pick around it if necessary.
>
> Also I agree that an identifier would be the best solution (and most solid/stable). We'll go with that. I think we'll just add the option to Base to make it automatically available to all Storage classes if possible. Although I don't see why anyone would use S3/CF/Ninefold/Dropbox twice or more. It's particularly interesting for FTP/SFTP/SCP protocols. But, I like consistency where possible, even if no one might use it, it's still possible to do it if anyone wants to for some reason, so might as well. :)
>
>
> On Dec 1, 2011, at 3:02 AM, burns wrote:
>
>> done :)
>>
>> I'll look into my Bundler problem a little closer...
>> I wiped everything out and ran a fresh 'bundle install',
>> and everything looked fine until I tried to perform a backup and it
>> would complain as if those weren't installed.
>> So, I don't know... probably something I wasn't doing right. I was
>> getting a bit frustrated :)
>> I'll try to solve that later tonight, or tomorrow. I've got to go eat
>> something before I starve!!! lol
>>
>> On 11/30/2011 08:54 PM, Michael van Rooijen wrote:
>>> Don't forget to add `:@chunk_suffixes` to the array, otherwise it doesn't know how many chunks to remove (if any) when cycling.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
>>> https://github.com/burns/backup/commit/0b273c75bbeb2e04f0a74de0f9ca5124eda61d2d#commitcomment-759874
>>
>> ---
>> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
>> https://github.com/burns/backup/commit/0b273c75bbeb2e04f0a74de0f9ca5124eda61d2d#commitcomment-759889
>
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/burns/backup/commit/0b273c75bbeb2e04f0a74de0f9ca5124eda61d2d#commitcomment-759905