nddrylliog/rock — comment on commit 019798b25843bfedcc6fb7929d6e8e7cbf0c8946
File:  line 0
By nddrylliog:

@fredreichbier Actually, we should dump the HashMap literal and do it your way. It just makes more sense. Making '=>' an operator that can be overloaded is not a Big Deal(TM) and it seems to have a lot of benefits. HashBag literals can be done the same way I think.

Re: the "<=>" operator :) it was stolen from Ruby (shamelessly) and actually behaves like strcmp (but for numeric types), ie returns -1 if it's smaller than, 0 if equals, 1 if greater than. But I don't think it should be used in literals! One char too much.