jybox/ZeroMS — comment on commit 71b8f1d73fa73bbbc177209c58597427f08d416c
File:  line 0
By whtsky:

well,i believe QNetworkAccessManager can do more than QHttp,but **we only need to download some images**,why not use QHttp?t will be easier and can do as well as QNetworkAccessManager.
and,ccording to QT 3 and 4,there must be a lot changes in QT 5,and it may be hard to move to QT5 from QT4.If ZeroMS can work well on QT4,why do we move to QT5?so,why we are considering about QT5?
Even though u wanna move to QT5,we can also use QHttp now.Because it is easier to use,and there MUST BE a re-write in many parts.We can use QNetworkAccessManager at that time.