Prakash-Surya/spl — comment on commit 30290b32a908b1b69621b7dd5b0b0f119c753cb9
File:  line 0
By Prakash-Surya:

Ok, cool. I'll update the patches to do that.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 05:01:12PM -0800, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> The general approach seems reasonable to me since we'll get more test coverage this way. However, rather than exposing task_alloc() I think it makes more sense to just embed the taskq_ent_t in the existing splat_taskq_arg_t. This is after all how we expect the interface to be used ti avoid the memory allocation.
>
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/Prakash-Surya/spl/commit/30290b32a908b1b69621b7dd5b0b0f119c753cb9#commitcomment-736478

--
Cheers,
Prakash