hij1nx/EventEmitter2 — comment on commit 811bfc0687a32600ba8fb3986d69a27ca058bb52
File:  line 0
By karlbohlmark:

Sounds reasonable, I'll try it anyways. Actually I was a little tempted to also implement something like
```
emitter.on('model.{modelName}.{event}', function(){
//make the named captures available here somehow
})
```
It would actually be useful even though the captures are not actually made available, just because it is more self documenting (the *s are probably more often than not placeholders for concepts known at write-time).

But then again, why not give the opportunity to subscribe to a regex? Then there will be no special-magic-secret pattern logic to document. What do you think?