troessner/transitions — comment on commit 90ff702f8d92da33d4d5d5705e90a54dba9e9559
File:  line 0
By troessner:

@elskwid Good point and I agree.

@clemens Good catch

"it should at least be inverted (i.e. turn it off with :scope => false) or spit out a warning if the class already responds to a message with the same name."

I agree. Continuing on what you said something like:

- If the class already responds to a message, don't overwrite that
- Issue a warning
- make it configurable

seems like a good way to deal with that.