nandykins/-g-pl — comment on commit 50aa0baebeb2424f35f3ae6263651233ea3ad7cf
File: draft.txt line 182
By nandykins:

Well, that's easy enough: Just have the >yfw return the input like a normal function call. We could tweak the function a bit to actually print “yfw {0}?” where {0} is the string you gave it, or just “yfw?” when the string is blank (or a forever alone is given).

So
```
>yfw "you ran this code"
```

Would appear on-screen as “yfw you ran this code? ”. To assign it to a variable, you'd simply use:

```
>implying reaction isn't >yfw "you ran this code"
```

Oh, and making >yfw directly assign wouldn't be too far out of the language concepts if we just make it a special statement. After all, that's how >implying works - it assigns that variable directly.

```
>yfw varname
```

Would work just like

```
>implying varname wasn't >yfw
```

In this regard.