lantz/mininet — comment on commit 08b0b085b8e08351957bd0508ff8fac4e1824422
File:  line 0
By brandonheller:

Either way you're waiting on output. Looks good to me - the added doc stuff describes what it does, and it sounds useful.

If anything, the original command sounds misnamed; waitComplete sounds more obvious than waitOutput when you're not waiting for output, you're waiting for command completion.