doctrine/search — comment on commit 02240cfd7bad1770ec3543452249c1f53a404efa
File:  line 0
By mikelohmann:

Yes. That approach we are currently following. Thanks for the link. I
will have a look at it. Next steps will be tests for the client and
then start with SOLR. If we see the buzz-client is not fullfilling our
requirements we now have something in the backhand. :)

Regards.

Mike

2011/10/25 Michael Dowling
:
> I agree that a Doctrine specific adapter should be utilized. I don't think Doctrine should create a custom HTTP client, nor is it necessary to create some global PHP initiative for a uniform HTTP interface.
>
> Another very feature-complete HTTP client that is actively maintained and sponsored by a mutli-million dollar company is Guzzle: https://github.com/guzzle/guzzle : http://www.guzzlephp.org/
>
> If Doctrine would ever have adapters for SimpleDB, Solr, etc, then a rich HTTP client might be a good idea.
>
> -Michael
>
> --
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/doctrine/search/commit/02240cfd7bad1770ec3543452249c1f53a404efa#commitcomment-673902
>