returneksibir/yakala — comment on commit d11a69bf12a4cce94f5b7110ca7c69490f2d0390
File:  line 0
By rimbi:

On my windows machine, the reverse is true: hashIt has a slightly better
performance than hashCode.
Good idea, changed it.

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Sinan Nalkaya <
reply@reply.github.com>wrote:

> maybe you should not execute url.length() for each time.
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Cem Eliguzel
>
> wrote:
> > Meantime, I've run the test code at https://gist.github.com/1294609 .
> According ro rhe results, hashCode of String class is a little bit faster
> than hashIt.
> >
> > --
> > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> >
> https://github.com/returneksibir/yakala/commit/d11a69bf12a4cce94f5b7110ca7c69490f2d0390#commitcomment-657587
> >
>
> --
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
>
> https://github.com/returneksibir/yakala/commit/d11a69bf12a4cce94f5b7110ca7c69490f2d0390#commitcomment-657694
>