returneksibir/yakala — comment on commit d11a69bf12a4cce94f5b7110ca7c69490f2d0390
File:  line 0
By rimbi:

1- "what you did is not a hash function im sorry, it is possible that different string names may hit same hash number easily."
What's your definition of hash function? What's the missing point here? "hit same hash number easily"? What if that's OK for our purpose, which is the case here?
Regarding the speed, I'll compare the above and hashCode from String class.
2- That's intentional, nothing wrong.
3- That's not correct, you'll understand it if you look at the source carefully.
4- What do you mean with "better"? Criteria please.

By the way, I ran this code for oabout 9 hours with 2 spiders and a random waiting time beteen 20 - 80 ms and according to the outputs, the performance was quite good. I haven't observed any tangible slowness.