Meanwhile, to Ron Paul, who remembers that crash as well, in marvels at the folks who refused to see the conditions for potentially even bigger crash, if we do not address our underlying financial ills. Congressman, you've long warned that Washington has been sort of dilly-dally in the face of issues we can't put off, but it does. How bad could it get? Well, probably worse than anybody ever conceived of, and they would think 1987 was rather minor. And when you look at it, I'm fascinated with a charge on NASDAQ in this last several years, 30 years, because that is a mere blip. If you look at it, I think people would be honest with it, 1987, it was a bull market correction, it turned out to be very minor. And I remember when that happened, I thought, if this was a bull market correction, how big will the bull market go? And it was gigantic, you know, it didn't happen immediately, but you know, up until 2000. I work on the assumption that the real bear market in stocks started in the year 2000, and if you go into the value of any index, it's all lower than it was in the year 2000. Nobody made any real money since 2000. So, yes, I think they're going to go down continuously, but I think the big crash is not necessarily before us, because I think the crash has already occurred, and that we're in a bear market for stocks. Yeah, but if you think about it, Congressman, we've essentially doubled from where we were four years ago. That's so the Obama people were going to say. And they said they talk about the fact that we've come off that now I'm going to have a market legend here is going to talk about these things called dead cat balances, whatever you want. But the fact of the matter is we have come off our worst levels, but you step way back and you said that this can't go detached from what's going on in Washington, right? And play that out for me. No, and you can't detach it from monetary policy either because bubbles come from the Federal Reserve, and the bubbles are encouraged by excessive spending. Excessive spending encourages the Fed to create extra money. They can't tell where the money is going to go. And many times it goes into stocks. Sometimes it goes into houses. And sometimes it goes into the pockets of the bankers and back to the Fed again. They can't predict that. Well, that way the fact could be setting up another bubble. Right, Congressman? I mean an artificial, really artificial bubble with bonds and interest rates that if that were to be pricked, I mean that. Well, I think we live with it. It's been made worse. Not only do you have the moral hazard of the Federal Reserve, but you have the moral hazard of the President's Working Group on Financial Market. It's still called Plunge Protection Team, which was established in 1987. And they were very active. They were very active in O.A. And look at what they did behind the scenes and look how they spent trillions and trillions of dollars. So people get you know thinking, oh they'll take care of us. They'll take care of us. But I think that just allows the distortions to get much greater. So the distortions are there. The cure is worse than the underlying illness. On the short run, they don't want the cure. But on the long run, let me tell you what's going to come is a lot worse than taking the medicine that we need right now. Thank you very much. Good seeing you again hearing you at least. By the way, we're going to have the Congress and Sun Senator Rand Paul who's going to trash everything his father just said, I don't think he's going to do that. 8 p.m. tonight on Fox Business Network. Talk about a guy says we have to get tough in Washington to avoid anything. Rand Paul tonight his prescription might unsettle you, but he says we have no choice on Fox Business.