Have they been other constitutional challenges in regards to COVID? We're seeing successful legal challenges in many jurisdictions around the world, in Portugal, in the Czech Republic, in Germany, in Michigan, in Pennsylvania, and there are other challenges in other jurisdictions in Canada as well. Specifically in Germany, the efforts there are being spearheaded by Dr. Fullmeck and we have a very good productive relationship. We believe in the economy of effort, we want to take the most efficient route as possible rather than the most costly strategy that prolongs litigation. Increases as much billable hours as possible. We think it makes much more sense to recycle expert witness his affidavits, perhaps some interlocutory orders where relevant in particular jurisdictions and we're going to continue to do that. If this challenge is successful, what it would look like for residents of British Columbia? It would look embarrassing for a government and it would be a monumental success for our stakeholders but most importantly I think people would be very happy to put this behind them and get on with their lives and that's what we'd like to see happen. Why was the suit filed in BC but not federally? Everything to do with healthcare in Canada is delegated to the provinces under the Constitution, specifically section, I believe it's section 92, sub 13 of the Canadian Constitution delegates anything to do with healthcare down to a provincial mandate. The designers, if you will, of our country decided that healthcare should be under a provincial mandate and as such if you have a problem with it you need to deal with it at a provincial level, not at the federal level. Is there anything good that has come out of the lockdown? Yes, there has been. I would say that it's forced people to introspect and learn more about their own country.