So this is a video about should Fukushima use bananas and the name is supposed to pop up. Should Fukushima use bananas to power the future? And there's a comment there and so when you click on it from Huma Inting, what you ended up with was, and I'll get rid of this one here, Tim Worstall, the Fukushima radiation leak is equal to 76 million bananas, 76 million bananas. Wow, just wow Tim, what did the world do to you to make you diving in your arena wonder that you would say something like that? Why didn't your editors catch that and why didn't your production catch that? Why didn't Forbes catch that? Why would Forbes allow you to put up that head and low in a wonder? 76 million bananas. And what he's doing is he's talking about disintegrations per seconds with beckholes and the nuclear terminology of 40 trillion beckholes released into the Pacific Ocean so far. Now this article came out on the 8th, 10th, day of 2013. So it wasn't very long ago. It's kind of interesting because Forbes went up for sale a couple of months later. Now Tim also wrote Disarticle here, NSA prism sounds like a darn good idea to me. That's what the government is for to spy on you and track tracing database you and watch you all the time. Wow, you can't make that stuff up. But yeah, Forbes went up to sale because they got people like debt der and the editors won't stop it. I don't know what's going on. Now Tim, he's got a blog. It's really bad. I'm not going to dwell on that one. But he was, he sells, he's a consultant and a dealer in scatting him and other exotic metals. Well, scatting him is a nice at hope. It's a short libdeus at hope, which is really interesting in that. That here's somebody that understands that makes a living off that but he's claiming that 76 million bananas is the equivalent of the radiation coming out of Fukushima. He's equit, so what he's doing is he's equating bananas with uranium 234, uranium 235. So if you took a piece of uranium 234, 235, the same size as a banana, you can kill everybody in your community. And then you can go to every community and a planet with that one piece, the size of a banana, the single banana. And you can kill everybody in every community. If you were dropped that into a lake, you would pollute the lake till the end of time. And you would go to jail till the end of time. You would be the biggest criminal on the planet till the end of the time. If Al-Qaeda had a banana size of uranium, which is what he's equating a two-in-dissarticle here, and his amazing at Forbes never caught this and that deritators never stopped this. But if you had a banana size piece of uranium or plutonium, that's a dirty bomb. It's the same thing that they use in the A10 Warthog, the Farmer in other countries, but that's uranium 238, because it's underwent chain reaction. That's why 234, 235, the plutoniums, 24,000-year-half loyfe, but so deadly, it gets into your body so readily, it's equated into your system so fast. This is amazing that somebody that deals in heavy metals and Scadium is actually a boy product of uranium. And so he's equating uranium 234, 235, just coming out of Fukushima, non-stop. At the New York Times, we're saying it's 600 tons a day. We got peer review models that showed that the ocean is radiated just after the first two weeks of the releases in a six-year period, but that's just using C-C-137, which is code word for uranium plutonium, by the way. Because you'll never hear uranium plutonium put into a sentence, but it's amazing that Forbes done that. What were they up to that he allowed this creature to write this article? What is he up to to write this article? Why can 92,000 views on it? This is outrageous. This is an absolute betrayal of humanity. Somebody would equate a banana with uranium 234, 235. Remember, the reactors don't run on bananas. They run on uranium plutonium. They don't run on strontium. They don't run on iodine 131, with a half-life of seven days. Think about the iodine 129, with a half-life 15 million years. The iodine 129, 15 million year half-life. A half-life, if you multiply it by 10. So, to 15 million year half-life, then it's actually 150 million year life. Because it breaks down into different radio isotopes. The funny gets down to scantium, which is what he makes his money out. This is one of the most outrageous, most criminal things you can imagine that you're looking at on the screen. It's embarrassing that somebody on this planet would do that, particularly in embarrassing when somebody makes money off uranium boy products. Like Tim does. And I would like to see 2,000 blogs tear this person apart today and put an end to his career and his future. Because that's what he deserves. We won't get our way. But that's what he deserves. And in the future, that's what people like this will be getting. Except it'll be a million people screaming at him that he's a monster. And that we need to put monsters like that away. Right? Because he also wrote that article, but prison had a government should monitor everybody. That's what the governments are for. He said, so that's not a real human. That's a creature. That's a critter. Take care folks. And if you feel like a blogger, maybe tell him that a banana got nothing to do with uranium 234, uranium 235. The situation may be worse than thought. Studies from last year indicate that radioactive water will contaminate the entire Pacific Ocean in just six years. Kim Minji reports. This graphic shows the gradual contamination of the Pacific Ocean due to leaks of radioactive water from the crippled Fukushima nuclear plant in Japan. The simulation which was run by a German Marine Research Institute shows the entire Pacific water is being polluted by radioactive water in just six years. We need to get subscribed and get this unity stronger and beat YouTube at their own game. Okay, that's what this is about. Like I said, go to the remix button, hit the remix button. That way you'll have this video. And keep up with this. Otherwise, YouTube is just going to control us guys. And it's really bad.