I was talking about the fence and stuff again. I know earlier you were saying you're going to go over, I guess you've done the letter, but I've been thinking about it. And my homework is to read it and tailor it and then submit it. But my thought was to send it as what they call it with the mail we have to sign for a hand signature or serve mail. Sure. I didn't know if that would basically trigger the government to respond or if they didn't respond since it was certified, then that means they have basically absolved or given up their right to take action against you. I don't know about that. Maybe the purpose of that letter would be to exhaust an integer remedy if you want to sue them. The letter is after the fact they've already established the rulemaking. They already had public debate on it. We've already passed that time. So that's why I did the video. This is your next step. So I don't know. I'll mention something about the chat GPT just a second, too. There's another thing I want to share with you guys. And Michael, I think you were going to ask them, but Gary has to hand up again. Right up there. Oh, I was going to actually forgotten too was drawing. So sorry. Okay, yeah, no problem. Oh, I just was asking about Tim soon, but I think you addressed it. I definitely got to, yeah, I'm going to cover that next week. I'm sorry, I didn't really have time this week, but I want to give you guys something. The reason why I do some of these things like letters, so you have a written understanding of what I think are the most important points. Like, for example, the rig says we're going to prevent money laundering. Okay. First of all, the guys like you and me that are worth $3 million, and we're opening up an account to trade with Coinbase or something. Really, really KYC for a company that's going to have a net worth of $100,000 in most cases, that's so important that's going to prevent money laundering. And if you are going to prevent money laundering or drug trafficking or whatever, why haven't you succeeded yet? You've been saying that since the late 70s. So why do I have to give up rights to privacy? Just because I want, I'm going to pay a tax for indemnification, and I'll have to give up all this information so that you can use it against me later if I'm a suspect in your crime that's never going to happen. You know, so that's kind of the theme of how I was suggesting, but I'll give you guys a letter. I'm not sure what remedies we have, but again, it's just KYC at another choke point. Kind of get sick of it.