There's one thing about Zachanike that makes people really think that he knows what he's talking about. And that's when he's able to share facts randomly and very quickly from the top of his head in such a manner that makes you think, wow, he's a really intelligent man. But a friend of mine sat down and went through a five minute talk of his once. And in that five minutes he was able to make over 25 mistakes. Charles Darwin went on an island by the name of Callatropet. There is no such island as the callotropist islands anywhere. It was actually the Galapagos Islands that Darwin visited where he found finches. And there he found birds packing at midget. These finches do not pack at niches as Nike says. They lived in separate ecological niches. Depending upon the ecological midget, they pack the big captain becoming long and short. The differences Darwin observed between these finches were far more than simply beak length. They included differences in color, size, mating behavior, songs, and preferred food. This observation was made in the theme species, not in different species. Darwin's observations of varying beaks were made on 14 different species of finches, not just one as Dr. Nigh Claims. The beak length actually did not vary within the species. Charles Darwin wrote a letter to his friend Thomas Thumpton. All of Darwin's published correspondence is printed and even available electronically online. And it contains no record of anyone named Thomas Thumpton. Charles Darwin himself said that they were missing links. He did not agree with it. Darwin admitted that there were missing lakes, but that does not mean he disagreed with his own theory. He simply predicted where the missing lakes would be found. The reason is because, that if you analyze the church, the church will again thank previously. The church was never against science. Almost all the great European scientists of Galileo's time, including Galileo, were devout Christians. People like Newton, Copernicus, Kepler, Boil, Linnaeus, Pascal were all committed believers in the Bible. And you know that the Thin-Din is Galileo to death. The Thin-Din is Galileo to death. Galileo, a devout Catholic, was never sentenced to death. He was sentenced to life imprisonment on June 22nd, 1633. And then that sentence was commuted to house arrest. He died more than eight years later on the evening of January 8th, 1642, of old age. Galileo believed that his theories fit with the Bible, and he wrote a book arguing this based on early interpretations of Christians like Augustin. Night goes on to make the same false statement two more times, but let's only count it as one factual error. So all of us end this. Most of them, they support the Thir-D, because it went against the Bible. But not before it was true. Actually, most scientists did not support Darwin's theory for many years, and most of these same scientists revered the Bible. Basically, this account by Dr. Knight is a total fabrication. All the Thin-Din is Lucie. They are four hominites. Everything Dr. Knight says here is wrong. There is no such word as hominites. He must mean hominids. Thin-Din is the Thin-Din is four hominites. There are not a mere four hominids. There are at least 14. First is Lucie, along with his guide, Dastinopetiket. There is no such hominid as Dastinopetiket. Lucie was an astralapathicus aphorensis. Which died about ten-and-a-million years. Knifey. The Ice Age was not three-and-a-third million years ago. It was between 1.6 million years and 10,000 years ago. Then next game, the homothepians. We're dead about five-and-a-half-and-a-million years ago. Homothepians did not die out 500,000 years ago. You and I, and even Zakirnaik, are homothepians. Then game, the Nyanatol man. According to evolutionary theory, Nyanatol man was not on the direct line to modern men. But an Ice Age offshoot. The Nyanatol man. We died 100 to 40,000 years ago. The Nyanatol man went extinct 30,000 years ago. Not a hundred to 40,000 years ago. Then game, the poor stage, the crow magnon. Crow magnon man is the same thing as homo sapiens. Which Nyanatol man mentioned as a different earlier species. There is no link at all between these stages. Actually, evolutionary biologists have found many examples of what they claim to be links between these stages. For example, homo habilis, homo ergaster, and homo hyalbergensis. If you know a so Albert, Georgi, who got the Nobel Prize for inventing, for inventing the Vedavan seed. Georgi didn't invent Vedavan seed, he discovered it. Vedavan seed is a naturally occurring substance that doesn't need to be invented. He wrote the book, the KVAP and man, Agil Davenci. Albert said Georgi's book was not called the crazy ape and man. But simply the crazy ape. And it was not a reputation of evolution, but a sociological commentary. If you know about Rupert's Albert, this person wrote a new theory of evolution. Agil Davenci. Who is Rupert's Albert? I can find no trace of anybody with that name. From the ape. If you know of the Frank Salisbury, you are the biologist. Nike quotes one unknown person after another. Who is Sir Frank Salisbury? Again, bigger searching can find no trace of anybody with that name. But to give Nike the benefit of the doubt, this will not be counted as a factual error. If you know about white meat, so white meat. White meat? Who is Sir White meat? For the fourth time, no trace can be found of anybody with this name. At lower level, and Ami-ba, at lower species level, Ami-ba can change to Paramicia. There is no such thing as Paramicia. Perhaps he means Paramecium. But the evolutionary change of an Ami-ba to a Paramecium is far more dramatic biologically than the relatively small biological difference between apes and humans. I want to hand this great. Who got hard in the film. He said it is unimaginable. There is no such person as Hensis Crake. Nike probably means Francis Crick, the co-discover of DNA. Francis Crake believes fully in evolution.