Okay, we'll do one more. Oh wow. I'm talking to Jason Silver. Sup, bro. I've been a fan for the longest time ever. Oh, thank you so much. I am so used to your voice and your picture on my laptop screen or my phone screen. Nice. I swear to God when I saw you in that room, it's like the matrix glitched. Yeah, there was a glitch. Yeah. Yeah. Anyways, the dream is collapsing. Okay. So, um, so I'm a psychiatrist, but I also have a lot of interest in space and in natural in the natural world. Yeah. So my question to you is because I face that a lot at work when I talk about love being the pillar, you know, human connection and love being the ultimate pillar. Yeah. A lot of scientists give me the, you know, the pseudo science talk. They don't believe in that. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Even though we've seen in biology when we've extracted the hormones and chemicals that mimic the experience of inner peace and the brain, of course. And we add them to cells and pitchy dishes. We can recognize growth, right? Yeah. But I mean, we, yeah, I agree with you. I mean, we are more than biology. We are also stories, you know, I mean, our biology creates the stories in our heads, but the stories in our heads also shapes our biology. It's a feedback loop. So, yeah. And you can also see the sense of love to be translated in quantum physics or astrophysics as this innate affinity matter has to react to the other matter. Sure. And I think it's quite traumatic when you look at the timeline of the universe going from quarks to proteins. Yeah. It's quite traumatic too. Yeah. So, my question to you is, if that was the original intention in religion and in the chronicles of faith, if that was the original message, love and connection, doesn't that make you the alchemist that gives vision to the visionless? And if that's the original meaning of religion and the original meaning of how humans should live their life, then today you were walking on water, sir. So, wow. Thank you. Oh. So, I just want to get your take on Terence McKinnon's thoughts on the transcendental object at the end of time. Transcendence is the object of the ancient time. Yeah. So, yeah. I think there's a guy called, well, thank you for your kind words and, you know, whatever you see in me, I see in you. So, takes one to no one, bro. I mean, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. As far as the transcendental object, well, first to respond to the power of love, there's a guy called Rich Doyle. He's a professor of rhetoric. He calls it the power of language, University of Pennsylvania. He wrote a book called Darwin's Pharmacy, Sex Plants and the Evolution of the Neosphere, which of course is what rises above the biosphere, is the kingdom of ideas and memes that clocks the planet of information. He says that words inform reality, and for those that think that words don't cause physical changes in physical systems, think of how much energy is required to say the word I love you. So, a certain amount of energy, right? But that, the amount of energy that I require to say the word I love you is much less than the amount of energy that it could impact the person that receives that word, right? So, it could have a much more energy, impactful effect on somebody than the energy required to utter those words. So, words can definitely impact physical systems. We are physical systems, and language can completely affect our neurochemistry and have a dent and leave a dent. As far as the transcendental object of the end of the day, there's a theory that tries to account for Fermi's paradox. Fermi's paradox is the universe in all its vastness seems prime for life. Now, we're finding so many exoplanets that meet the Goldilocks, Earthlike conditions for life, but why don't we see evidence of advanced civilizations when the conditions seem so prime for it? The scales seem so inevitable. So, what this guy says, the Transension Hypothesis says, and this makes sense when you look at what's happening with us. Advancement of all technological civilization goes both ways. It goes outer and it goes inner. Outer means we spread it throughout the land, we conquer the rest of the planet, maybe eventually we put bases on the moon, maybe we'll reach other planets, we'll expand outwards, but there's a simultaneous expansion inwards, right? Computation gets denser and denser and denser, right? Initially, we'll get to femtoscale, smaller than nano, femtoscale densities of computation. These are the densities of black holes, okay? When you get to femtoscale densities of computation, and by that point, we'll be living in virtual worlds because we'll leave biology behind. So imagine a universe, a matrix, right? Not a dystopian matrix like in the movie, but a paradise kind of matrix, a virtual reality where everybody full flourishing of human imagination and an infinite boundless cosmos of the mind, okay? Femtoscale densities and virtual worlds inside those femtoscale densities, eventually all of mind leaves space and time behind because we go into these black hole dimensions outside a space and time, slingshot to the end of time and high five every other advanced technological civilization. That's Transension. And it's an interesting theory put out there, the guy John Smart put it. That was the closest thing that I found in astronomy in terms of astronomy theories to to mechanize transcendental object at the end of time. So maybe the new space is inner space. Maybe we have to stop worrying about conquering other lands and start exploring all the space down below and within, you know? Thank you so much. I think we're good. I think we're good. Yeah? Yeah. Okay. So should we take one more? Sure, we're good. One more?