I'm drawn. Folks, it's been a while since I've been reviewing Bose, but for the past few years, a lot of things have changed, especially after COVID. Some of these companies are starting to reinivate by making other designs, by improving their quality or just making exotic products. So I want to start getting into some of it. This one is going to be about reviewing an AFR tree. Let's take it apart. So I got two Bose here. One is a new fiberglass mongol bulb, but I'll do that on another video. And this other one is... Oh, it's been here. So for this video, I'll be reviewing this AFR tree tatar bulb that they made. Very beautiful. It's got the blue glossy look on the front and the back. As you can see, there's the lower right there. The FR tree. And 50 pounds right here. What I don't like about this is that they don't write 50 pounds at what draw length. That's important, especially in Asian-Aziotic archery, if people want to draw 35, 32, from the composition. Of course, it's not a historical composition where it's horned sinew. So we got the wood core at the riser. Quite a modern design, but sandwiched with bamboo on the front and the back. And then fiberglass, I believe, is the final sandwich between the front and back. But they use bare-paw fiberglass, so it's very high-quality fiberglass. Now when you transition to the sea, you start seeing the same thing with the bamboo, goes all the way along, and then you have a hardwood at the sea. So this is not trying to be historical in terms of material composition. And because of how glossy it is, the historical bulbs wouldn't look like this. They would have sinew on the back and then horn on the belly. Sometimes the horn can be glossy, but the sinew usually is protected with birch bark, not to mention the sea-at transition here. On the fiberglass bows, at the very least, the sea-ass are pure wood transitioned into the fiberglass bar. But on an eliminate bow, you can see it's quite a modern construction where it's still composite throughout where the bamboo, the sea-ass, it's the same consistent composition, but just added the hardwood to create that static tips. So when it comes to the historical shape, this, when it's on strong, I wouldn't say it's the best representation of a tatar bow, the kramian era, because a lot of the kramian tatar bows are heavily reflect to give you a lot more efficiency. But those are much harder to string. And I can see the practicality of bringing it down a bit so that users can string this more easily than a reflex bow, like those kramian ones. But perhaps those are the elite kramian tatar bows. I would assume the less reflex bows were used for soldiers. Or when a bow becomes used for a long time, it will start becoming more and more deflects with these horn composites. Or when a bow is strong for a long time, when you unstring it, it takes a while for it to go back to the reflex shape. So yes, this can be a representation of a tatar bow when it's just strong, but over time those kramian tatar bows, especially the elite ones, will reflex back to the initial sea shape unless there's damage, of course, and depending on the quality of the bow, of course. There you go, bow is strong. And now it's represents quite well as a tatar bow, especially in Eastern Europe, Central Asia in the 15th century, I'd say, for a cavalry bow. Tatar bows in comparison to say like an Ottoman bow, they shoot larger heavier arrows, relatively speaking. So an Ottoman arrow like this for a tatar bow would be actually a little bit small. But you wouldn't be shooting something. I would say this big. This is an ancient Persian Iranian arrow. It wouldn't be this big. It would be in the 20s too. So techniques you would use, there are people mentioning Slavic draw with the one thinker like this. So this could have been used according to Arab archery. Of course, you can have standard matri and draw mentioned by Byzantines. You can have with a chess anchor point here or a more conventional anchor point. Thumb draws of course would have been used as well. Yeah, it's about 50 pounds to 28. It's a very light bow. I assume this arrow would shoot pretty fast. They also have takedown versions, which is really good for people who wanted to travel. String is modern. I believe it's some kind of, it's not daqron. I think it's the one that stretches less. I think it's similar to the BCY material. There's only so much we can do indoors. Let's get out and shoot this thing. Okay, let's do some shooting in the wall. I never don't ask for an anchor archer to my gun. You don't have to walk here. I really like this bow. It's similar to a lot of the other laminate bows of its type. But it's very fast. I think they have archery. It does a good job now improving their quality. And with the bare-paw glass, you really get that reliability. It's pretty fast, I'd say. There you go. Follow-up shot. And then I'll do thumb draw later. But ah, you get the power of 32 inches. Some draw 32, let's see if it handles it. Oh, that's powerful. With that much power stroke, it is shooting with power. 50 pounds at 28 thumb draw. 182 FPS. 50 pounds 28 meter of shooting draw. 171 FPS. Well, the bulb's performing pretty good. I like how fast it shoots for an laminate bulb. And as you can see with the chronograph for the GPPU, it's not bad. Which is quite expected. But for the price, I'd say it's fair. Now, cosmatically, it's very beautiful, as you can see. Performance-wise, it's performing like any other bare-paw glass laminated bow I'd say from China. Which is decent quality and shoots pretty fast. I will say, though, I wish they innovated with more bow shapes. Because the reflex, reflex, reflex, this kind of shape gets boring over time. It'd be nice to experiment with some other designs like Cretan bows. Some of them, I've seen also the ancient aerobos, where it's just reflex, reflex, like a gold wing. That would be nice to see. There's other shapes as well, mobile designs. That seems like they took that off the market. Maybe it wasn't durable enough. Not sure. There's a Persian designs. It would be nice to experiment with other shapes, because the reflex, reflex, reflex, yes, it's widely used. But it's nice to see some other designs. Also, I think Bronze Age bows don't get enough love. And another kind of shape, I think, would be interesting for people, is just a simple D-shape. You know, I think simple D-shape bows made of quality, laminate designs with a historical handle. I think we'd get much more love. Because most of the D-shape bows you see today are made of wood. But it'd be nice to see them with laminate glass to see how they perform as well. A lot of the historical bows are made of D-shape. And they're often forgotten, because I guess we just think they're too boring. Another shape that I recommend is a Yertsie bow, which is a Syrian kind of bow of 2000 years ago, which is simple reflex. It was static tips. And then it wouldn't reflex here. So the main difference is, it's straight near the handle, almost like a Turkish bow. But then down here is start straightening out with a straight static tips. That would be nice to see also don't have string bridges on those designs. Be nice to see them other designs other than the shell-shall look, the tater look that you get with a lot of these bows. Other than that, I can't really complain too much. It shoots fast. Just what you expect from a bare-paw glass bow. And I recommend this if you like the cosmetic look. It also has a takedown option. You got the integrated string bridges. You have lots of options to customize it to the look, the look you want. And if you, especially if you're doing this for horseback archery competitions, I think this would be a good way to do, because with a takedown design, you can bring it on your backpack, which allows transportation a lot better. Anyways, thanks a lot for watching.