First question is from Mark Wolves. Can adding cycling to your training help grow your legs in any way? Or will it be detrimental? Depends how it's added, I would say. Sprinting, and I've been shocked by the muscle building effects on legs that sprinting can have several times. I've noticed it on myself. Now, I know a little bit of a caveat here. My upper legs are the most responsive part of my body. I can always make my legs big if I want. I wish the rest of my body was like that, but my legs tend to do that. I do notice, and I have in the past, done sprints on a cycle, and I've done outdoor sprints, in both of which have caused my leg muscles to actually build and grow, in particular, the cycling. I have had clients who've done this as well. Again, another caveat. These are typically fit clients. I'm not having Mrs. Johnson, who just started with me sprinting on a bike. These are typically people who worked out for me with me for a long time, very consistent. We've thrown in a couple days a week of hit cardio on a bike, where they sprint, and they'll always, I've had quite a few of them come back to me and be like, whoa, I'm noticing more development in my legs. I think it's the explosiveness of the activity that's happening. That's why I like the salt bike, because it does have that low impact way that you could implement that power and be able to do that in a way where it's more control. I used to do hill sprints, and I noticed the same thing. I got great muscle development out of my quads and my legs. Overall, grew as I was doing these hill sprints, and then I used that same interval sequence on the salt bike and noticed the same type of gains to throw in the mix. There's a fine line here, though. It's a short window. You guys are both advocating sprinting on the bike. If you're somebody who does, like Taylor's into cycling right now, and he's cycling 60 minutes to 90 minutes minimum every time he does this. He goes on for a long ride. That's not a great way to build muscle in your legs. Just because at that point, it's just like a runner who runs for a long period of time, it's not advantageous for your body to carry a bunch of muscle on it. It'll teach you an efficiency. It's conflicting message. If you're somebody who is squatting three times a week, you're eating, and that's the other thing, too. You also got to take a consideration when you get on a bike, the amount of calories that you burn. Even if it's only for a short duration, say 30 minutes or so, that can be a high calorie burn. You can burn 800 calories in 30 minutes of cycling easily, especially if it's high intensity. If you're somebody who has a hard enough time eating enough calories to build and put size on, and then you add in cycling and hoping that that will build muscle in your legs, it might have the reverse effect because now you're starting to burn more calories and you can even consume. There's that fine line there. Shoot, going on a 12-minute post workout cycling sprint or get on the recumbent bike or the cycling bikes and do interval sprints for 12 minutes. Like after like fuck, that could be incredible, but again, still making sure you're fed. Here's what I did. This was, my legs got probably the biggest that I ever gotten when I did this, as I did two or three days a week of training my legs with weights, which typically included squats and lunges and Bulgarian split stance squats and those types of exercises. Then on Tuesday and Thursday, I would do a 15-minute hit workout on an assault bike with high tension and explosive power. When I did that, man, my legs just, and part of the reason why I think they grew is, one, it's explosive, it's very explosive. I can output a lot of power in a different way than I can with weights. The second reason is that the short bouts of intensity with the bike gave me more stamina which contributed to better workouts with my legs with the squats. I would also think that it would facilitate recovery faster too. It did, it did. I just get these crazy pumps. That would be great. One of the most muscular, athletic, athlete legs you'll ever see ever. Forget, besides bodybuilders, obviously bodybuilders and power lifters are going to have the most developed legs. I see. The sprinting, I skaters and the sprinting cyclists. Have you ever seen some of the top lovels? Lava strips. They have pro bodybuilder legs and it's funny because they have super lean upper bodies. It's the most lopsided bottom developed body I've ever seen. But the legs look like they could be on the Olympia stage. That muscular increase. I was trying to explain this to my sister and brother and brother and I are both really into peloton. I picked this question mainly because that company, it's so popular. Everybody thinks that all they need right now to get in shape. To unpack that and be like, well, here's really how I would use a bike in my house even if I was trying to train. Yes, I would use it for sprints and intervals and things like that, but also you have to incorporate weight training.