I wanted to just introduce everybody to Chuck Jowls. Chuck is the president of local 1199. The steel workers and Chuck has been in the middle of the fight to make sure that United Technologies does not shut down two plants here in Indiana. Double plus 2100 good paying jobs. I want to thank Chuck for all of the effort that he has made fighting for these workers now and in the past. But here is the point. As a nation, we have got the end of the absurdity of seeing plants that are profitable where workers are productive, where the quality of their work is not in dispute. Companies are making good profits off of these plants here in Indiana. But just because you can pay a worker in Monterey, Mexico $3 an hour. And just because a couple of years ago, you can give a severance package for your former CEO of $171 million. This is the type of greed that in fact is destroying the middle class of this country. You can't give a former CEO $171 million in a severance package. And then tell workers here in Indiana that there is not enough money to maintain their jobs. When in fact the company continues to make money right here. Chuck, did you want to say a few words? Yeah, a couple of things. Really appreciate Sanders Sanders standing up for working people throughout the country. He's only one. He's been a champion of our cost for a number of years. And his situation on trade has changed one hour. We got unfair trade legislation to corporate greed, which has caused these 1,400 people to possibly soon be unemployed. Senator, can we stay on this issue for one second? It's about trade. Yeah, okay. In Michigan, you were very heavy on trade. Do you think that issue is going to help you get to voters here? Well, I think it will. I think this is Chuck just said it is very hard for people to understand why profitable corporations that have given $171 million severance package to a former CEO are shutting down plants in Indiana. And all over this country, this is not just Indiana. What we have seen over the last 35 years, tens of thousands of corporations who are saying, yeah, we're making money in America. But I don't really care about the workers here. I'm going to shut down the plant. And we're going to move to Mexico. We're going to pay people there for $34 an hour. We're going to make even more money. That type of corporate greed is in fact destroying the middle class of this country. And I think people all over this country are saying, you know what? That cannot continue. We need a trade policy which works for the middle class and working families and not just for the CEOs of large corporations. Do you think having another secretary Clinton maybe focused on trade? I think that would be great. I think clearly one of the differences in this campaign is that I have throughout my congressional career, way back in the early 1990s, understood that these trade agreements with us and after were permanent normal trade relations with China were a disaster for American workers. I understood that. I thought I was out of picket lines with workers and opposition. Secretary Cliffness, you know, has supported virtually every one of these disasters, trade agreements. And that is an area of strong disagreement that the voters of Indiana and America will have to consider. There's also a barrier where you have a lot of overlap with Donald Trump. Do you imagine working with him in the future on its issue? No, I think, you know, that Donald Trump looks in his own world. I think I need his ear picking up on an issue which from the political point of view is a popular issue. But I think at the end of the day, if you want somebody who has stood with working people is entire political career, not only in an effort to raise the minimum wage, the $15 an hour Mr. Trump, I think, thinks that a $7.25 and our federal minimum wage is just fine. I think if the workers of this country want a candidate who has stood with them, who will transform our trade policies? I think Bernie Sanders is not going to have to agree. Senator, do you feel that your attention to this particular issue with Indiana has moved to you and all of you in America? Well, Danny, I will tell you the answer to that in about 10 hours. I'll give you a very specific information. No, but I mean actually in coming to you moving to Mexico. Oh, well, I think, you know, let me be very clear and tell United Technology, and tell Carrie, United Technology, on scary. That if they think they're going to simply destroy the lives of 2100 people in charge. As I understand it, many of these workers have been in the after decades and got a whole family. The plan we represent is Carrie or the facility on the Westside Head of the NAMPLUS 1400 people been there since the early 1950s. Very probable. Second, third, some of the four generations that came through there. We've got people, one of our officers, Vicki Burris. She got nine family members that worked there. A lot of people have got husbands and wives. Doing away with a third job is just one livelihood. It's a moment. And if the United Technology thinks that they're going to do this, they're going to cause this much pain to so many families. And they're going to get away with this with impunity. They are wrong. Some of us and I, for sure, will be taking this issue up and saying very loudly and clearly that when you have a company that gets $6 billion in defense contracts from the taxpayers of this country, and then throw workers out on the street, you know what? We may want to rethink those defense contracts. So I'm going to tell you, United Technology, you're not going to get away with this. You're not going to destroy lives with impunity. You're not going to give your C-form a C-E-R-171 million dollar severance package and destroy 2100 lives and families here in Indiana and think, oh, no problem. We're not going to pay a price for the... You're going to pay a price for that. We have got to change, and this has been the theme of this campaign, corporate culture in America. This is not the case of a company that is losing money, that is desperate. They are making good profits. This is not a case where anyone thinks that these workers are not productive and highly efficient workers. The company acknowledges that. It is simply greed. They can make more money moving to Mexico, paying people that $3 bucks an hour. It is not acceptable. And I don't think trucking out of the only people in America would think it is not acceptable. Millions of people think this is wrong. And we are going to take a United Technology job. And I hope very much that they have the courage to rethink what they did. They will look pretty good. I think it will be good for their business to say, you know what? You know, we made a mistake. And we're going to keep these jobs here in Indiana. Because they agree to pay back some of the local tax incentives that they received after those denouncing jobs with leave. You think it should be taken a step further as you're suggesting that they should be penalized in some way? I think that the taxpayers of this country do not feel pretty good. They do not feel good about awarding defense profitable defense contracts to a company that is the business of destroying thousands of lives. And I think that should be taken into consideration when the federal government awards contracts. Sure, Tara, what can be done with the savings? I think we're going to put pressure on truck answer that. But you know, I think we're going to put pressure on them every way within time. And say listen, you want to explain. You got $6 million in defense contracts. Well, you know what? Some of us are going to do our best to make sure you don't get those contracts unless you sit down with this union. And we're going to keep the jobs out here in Indiana. And by the way, let me repeat this. I know I'm hearing Indiana and I know today's election in Indiana. This is my view in 50 states in the country, wishing this in my state of Vermont, you've seen the same thing. Truckage land? Yeah, well, we're not giving up the fight. We're going to rain wheat, wheat, pasta, can't, with sender, sender, snout, joke, not only self and others. Trying to keep the fight going on. Try to get carried away. Consider this move. Hopefully in the end, they'll feel like that with the pressure, everything is being done on the military part of it and the possible customer loss that my reconsider can be judged. Yes, but I'm just pick up on Chuck's last one. I assume that United Technology wants to sell their products in the United States of America. But the world will get out of the greed of this company. And we will get that out to customers all of the United States of America. If the United Technology does not reconsider, we think we will have it in the end. Except they're worried about saving $300,000 by moving to Mexico. They're not worried about losing many things in $200,000. I agree. Okay, thank you all for your time.