This is one of the key issues of artificial intelligence. When we think about what makes us human or what makes a machine a machine. In Silicon Valley and China, in many places where technology is king, the argument is that we are essentially technology. We don't have any magic sauce. We are infinitely complex, but we are the same than the tools that we make. So then the argument is that we can transcend humanity, which means our body limitations to become superhuman. I really believe that the concept of transcending humanity, the technological means a real result in us becoming like machines. I think that's where it gets really dangerous for us because to me that's a downgrade, not an upgrade. Because the things that make us human are not technology. They're not data, they're not algorithms. They're feelings of ocean's creativity, imagination, mysteries. They're all these things that are essentially not algorithms. In my book I argue that algorithms are great to use, but the end of the world is what makes us human our future. It's good for us to use computers and machines and technology to take care of the heavy lifting, but to look at them as being the same as us in terms of the capacity of existence, I think that's probably a very bad idea.