I bring out hammer drama and the next time we'll move from all social media. Five days later the attorney general recharges me on the case. I'm about to go back to prison four and the four-foot July. Like he's your case is for the four-foot July. He did 13 month. You got 13 month for the contempt of court. What was that chance when you were outside court and you were doing the grooming gang? I've just I've literally just spent today in my lawyers. I've prepared my statement. Sorry, my breathing's terrible. I've prepared my statement and as my defence and basically when I went up to that court that day, this is the facts, all provable facts. I went up to court that day. I went into court. I said is there a report restriction? The man said I don't know. So I looked, I've done training and I paid myself thousands of pounds to do my own training on legal system. Because I've become a citizen journalist and I didn't know the laws. In my first contempt case, I didn't know what I couldn't say. I didn't know where I couldn't stand. After I got my first contempt case, which was for down in Canterbury. And so people understand that. There's a court case going on in Canterbury. A young 15-year-old child went into a takeaway, a Muslim-owned takeaway, and asked for directions because she was drunk. Six of them took her upstairs and their gangrector. All of their DNA was found on the mattress. She was found shevelled walking down the street, emotional crying, screaming, the police arrested them. One of them left the country. The rest of them were given bail. I heard about this and I heard the court cases going on and I heard they were still running the same chicken shop. So I went down to Canterbury. I went into the business next door. I went into there was another business officer. So if you've seen any young girls in this shop and they said, yeah, there was young school girls in the essay. So for me, it's like, how can these men whose DNA was found at the scene? It's not just an allegation. Their DNA was found on the child. She was raped in every hole she had as a child. So I wanted to show people, I wanted to show people who lived in that area, these men are walking your streets. This is what's happened to a child, allegedly happened to a child. So I went to the court to do that. Now when I went to the court to do that, the judge took them out on the back so I couldn't get visual footage of them. I felt people should be warned. I still feel now the judge at four o'clock in the morning after I went to try and warn people. They raided my house. They took me before the judge and I was convicted because I filmed on the court property. That's what I did. But I didn't need these laws. So those men were convicted and given 25 years in prison. They should not have been on bail. They should not have been running the same chicken shop. That judge failed the British public to keep them safe. That's what I was prosecuted for. I was then given a suspended sentence. So when I went up to court this time, I don't have everything right. Trust me. I went in, I asked about, and the legislation on the judiciary website says, and already specifically says, a judge has no power to put a reporting restriction on any information surrounding the public domain. So I go in, I ask about a reporting restriction. They don't tell me. I look on the judiciary website. It says that there should be a confirmation on the screen and confirmation on the courtroom door. I've got pictures of both. There was no word of any reporting restriction. I went on the court website, no word of any reporting restriction. So I generally thought it's been lifted because the case is over. The jury are making their decision. But because I wasn't sure, I don't ever think still. I didn't tell anyone that any of the verdicts. I knew the verdicts are the first part. I didn't assume guilt. I asked them two simple questions, how you feeling about your verdict. And I was whisked from outside the court. I was taken before a judge. I was refused my legal representation. I was not even asked if I was guilty or not guilty. And within two hours, I was sentenced to 30 months in jail. And not just when, and when this happens, from my point of view, I've watched all this happen. I'm then sitting in prison. And I'm watching as human rights lawyers. And every journalist in the country is bending over each other to give a justified reason as to why I should be in jail. And if ever you can see, and this is just so, and how they're not doing this themselves, let me just show you. If ever you can see how out-of-touch they are with the British public, and that's why I truly believe on the fourth trial I'll go back to jail. Because there's some out of touch. If you've, oh, got no internet, if you go on YouTube and you put in Tommy Rums and sent to prison, Channel 4 Skynos BBC, all done big hit pieces, 10 minutes, 20 minutes, telling the country this is why he's in jail and he deserves to be in jail. Thanks for watching. I'll see you next time.