Saya pertama yang pertama saya suka beri awak. Jadi saya dah melihat anda yang berlaku sebelum anda, anda yang terlalu berlaku dan berlaku. Jadi, saya suka berlaku, Islam dan other religion, like Hinduism, like coating scriptures from Bhagavad Gita or something. like, don't you think there is a possibility to misinterpret it and provide misguidance to those who doesn't belong to that faith? What's the name, brother? Pardon? Your name? Shashi Warmun. No, okay. Kalau ada, ia berlaku yang ada misguidance di dalam kecil, itu berarti anda rasa untuk berlaku anda berlaku di Islam muslim profesional. The Brothers asked a very good question. A very relevant question to the topic. I'd like to thank him. His question is that I'm a specialist of comparative religion. I prefer calling myself a student of comparative religion. And when I quote scripture of other religion, like whether it be the Bhagavad Gita, whether it be the Bible, and if I misinterpret that scripture, then isn't it wrong as a Muslim? Totally wrong. I agree with you. That's the reason after every lecture of mine, we have question and session. Most of the religious speaker, whether it be Hindu, whether it be Christian, whether it be Muslim, most of the majority, more than 90 percent, after this speech, they have no question and session. Shashiw, did that for the first one who started and now Masha'Allah many of us, after every question, after every lecture, we have a question and session. Why? So that if you disagree with us, you are open to ask the question. In the question and the time, if any speaker, including myself, if the questioner proves that my interpretation is wrong, I, if I, if they prove to me first, I will say, I'm sorry, I will take it back if I make a mistake. As a Muslim, compulsory, I would apologize. Now, first say, I'm sorry, I misunderstood your scripture. Inshallah and future, I will not quote it. Never in my life of 25 years of Dawa, more than it. Have a single question, Masha'Allah, I can make mistakes. I'm a human being. I'm not perfect. No human being is perfect. Not a single question I ever quoted me anything and proved me wrong. Alhamdulillah. I can't be wrong. I can't be wrong. Therefore, we say, ask the question. If he poses a question to me, I will counter-quote him and give him the quotation from his scholars. I will quote, what does Swami Vikrindas say? I will quote, so it is intellectual. That is the reason what we say. Let's come for a debate. Friendly debate, no problem. But I'll only debate with someone who has some standing, not with every Tom Deacon Harry. You understand? You know, if I can get a million people from my talk largest gathering, even if we get 2%, 20,000, I will debate you. Any Tom Deacon Harry, I cannot. What my reason is, if you want to debate me, you should at least be able to gather minimum 20,000 for your speech. If I can get 2 million, you at least get 2%. Okay? If you can get 20,000 for your lecture, I'm willing to debate with you. If you cannot get, you give it to someone who can get. And there are many Hindu speakers in the world. There are many Christians speakers in the world who get 100,000. And more, in India, many people. You know, Shishiravishankar. He gets audience of 100,000, I debate it with him. And you know the outcome of the, have you seen that debate? Yes. What was the outcome? It was... What? It was an as I expected. Sorry? It was an as I expected. Oh, it wasn't as I expected. But did I break any rules of the debate? Pardon? Did I break any rules of the debate? No. Did I not answer all these questions? Did he answer my questions? No. One of the most famous Hindu preachers in the world. Shri Shri Ravi Shankar. Many people call him God. But sir, how about Sadguru? I guess he distraught some of your points, I guess. Saitguru from India. Okay. I range for dialogue. I will debate him. You arrange I will debate him. Sadguru is a famous person. Ask him. I will debate him. There are some people who have taken speeches and given answers, some people not himself. If he wants, let him arrange. No problem. I will debate him. Okay? Because I know he's famous. Any famous personality, if he wants to debate, I don't want to debate him. He wants to debate me. Open. Any topic. Any topic on comparative religion. Hinduism and Islam, no problem. Okay? And welcome. And if he points out anything in my speech, which I've said, which is out of context, or which is not as per the Hindu script, I don't apologize. I will give him from where I got all my research and not from non-Indus scholars, from Hindu scholars. I will give the reference. So most of the speakers say, yes, Zahkir is right, but, then the but comes. Very Hindu say, when you hear your speech, in two hours, I've learned what I have not learned in 40 years of my life. When in my speech, I give references. Did Shishir Abhishek give any reference in the speech? Even one reference, I give. Did he give a single reference brother? In my speech, how many references were there? Who's more authentic? A person who gives a reference, a person doesn't give a reference. You could have kept a, there's no objection. In a debate, you can have notes in front of you right around. I don't have notes. He can have notes. I've kept Shishir Abhishek and give levels again debate with me. Will he have? Even if he give him a million dollar, he will not have. I guess he will, but if he doesn't debate you, I'm sure one day I will. Most welcome. The day you can get 20,000 people for your audience, I will debate you. Now what do you can do question answer? Did I answer your question or not? Yeah, I did it. Very satisfactorily. I'm very happy. Thank you for accepting it. And may Allah guide you. And I pray for you there to come to the truth brother. Thank you very much. Yes, I'm most welcome.