lawful, transparent and fair. This means that a school would need to consider in a structured analysis whether the use of such technology is proportionate measure to achieve the aims it seeks to achieve or whether the interference with the child's rights is of a level that renders the use of the technology unacceptable. I can only assume that in the cases of the schools that have adopted this technology this analysis was not done or was not done properly because the answer is so obviously that it's not proportionate. That is particularly the case when we remember that GDPR stresses that children merit special protection.