It's privacy online dead. Well, governments would want you to believe that privacy online is dead and would also want to redefine it so that it is easier for them to collect data. It's easier for them to legitimize mass surveillance. But the truth is that if privacy was really dead, we would surveillance, the surveillance industry wouldn't be a multi-million dollar industry. Governments wouldn't be investing resources, money, forces and litigation into legitimizing mass surveillance and mass collection of data. So no, privacy is in dead. What are the worst threats to privacy online? The worst threats to privacy online is that governments, especially in developed countries, have found that the new way to censor or limit speech is surveillance. Because surveillance allows you the perfect solution to limit dissents because people then start practicing self-sensorship. So when individuals start practicing themselves, you do not need to censor content. You do not need to get bad publicity where you are a government that's curbing down opposition. You allow them to speak whatever they want with the knowledge and with giving them, you know, intimidating them with the fact that you are always watching. And any information that they put up, any contact that they have, any way that they communicate can be will be used against them. And what are the solutions, as you say it? For the solutions have come through post-node and a lot of solutions have come through civil society organizations that have just grouped together. And I think the one thing that's very important is that we do not need to stop by forkating the world of internet governments between the developed countries and developing countries. We've seen that both sides, both governments have used, even developed countries that are so-called have legal protections, will use these legal protections to justify mass surveillance. And so it is very important that initiatives like the Nestorine Proportionate principles and other initiatives taken by civil society organizations are adopted localised according to local sensitivities and pushed. And the future would be pushing back on big corporates, but also pushing back greatly on governments into limiting mass collection of data into limiting surveillance and stopping them from redefining what privacy means.