Labour Party wanted to include in the definition agreed by the Labour Party and its code of conduct. I think we can show that to you now. There is a bit of... It was withdrawn, actually, because there was pressure put on the Labour leader, but he wanted this to be added, which is not should it be regarded as antisemitic, to describe Israel its policies or the circumstances around its foundation as racist. Would you have liked to have seen that included? Absolutely. I think that would be an incredibly important clarification when you look at how IHRA's definition with examples has been implemented elsewhere. So, you see you has implemented it, which is the Electra's Union. And after that, you've had the names of events having to be changed, or events being cancelled, you had an academic put under inquiry. And it's all to do with this particular sticky point around the creation of the state of Israel. So you think creating the state of Israel was a racist act? In my personal opinion, yes, it displaced 700,000 Palestinians, but my question for those who think that this protection shouldn't be in there is do you think that someone who thinks that the 1948 NACBA was racist? Should they risk being reprimanded, suspended, or expelled from the Labour Party? Because if you think that, there's indirect conflict with article 10, protecting freedom of expression. Sugar? I don't quite have the same view on this. And I think the content and the context is important. I was a member of the Home Affairs Select Committee when we looked at anti-Semitism in the UK. And let us not forget, I mean, this is an issue that goes beyond the Labour Party, anti-Semitism, unfortunately, which is racism, is on the rise in our country. And we've all got to deal with it. But the way that we approached it as the Home Affairs Select Committee is, first of all, we properly consulted with the Jewish community. In fact, the first witness we took to give oral evidence was the President of the Board of Deputies. We recommended that all of the IHRA, the whole definition, be adopted, including all of the examples. We did suggest the addition of a clarification to be clear that it is not anti-Semitic, per se, to criticise Israel without evidence of anti-Semitic intent. Now, you know, had the Labour Party adopted that approach right in the first instance, I don't think we would even be having this conversation right now, we would have been talking about the things we should have been talking about over the summer, the social care crisis, the fact that this economy is dysfunctional, the fact that our NHS is in crisis, we would have been able to talk about all of those things. But because this wasn't dealt with properly in the first instance, we have ended up with the shameful episode, scarring our reputation for being an anti-racist party, which is one of the reasons why my family started supporting the Labour Party in the first place. So we've got to put this thing to bed and deal with it and we haven't. All right, people will ask, if creating Israel was a racist act, which you think it was, many people will think, well, where does that leave you? Does that then extend to dismantling the Jewish state of Israel? Well, it depends what you think dismantling the state of Israel is. So Joan Ryan and her letter to Jeremy Corbyn said that respecting Palestinian right of return for 5 million Palestinian refugees is itself a denial of the Jewish right of self-determination because it would no longer be a Jewish majority state. The question that I would put out of the people is, do you think that's anti-Semitism or do you think that's respecting you and General Assembly resolution number 194? So do you feel that down then by Jeremy Corbyn? I think that there is room for hope because there will be another NEC meeting, there will be longer clarifications up to vote and that is an opportunity to do the principle thing, consult Palestinians and protect them in this code of conduct. Lizzie? I was just going to say it's probably worth noting that the reason why that more fulsome you know, lines that Jeremy Corbyn preferred, he that wanted attached to the definition, the reason why that wasn't adopted was we understand because of the opposition of John Lansman, the founder of momentum and we are Wolfson who's another member of the NEC, both of whom are Jewish. So it's worth noting that even amongst, you know, people who are very supportive of Jeremy Corbyn, there was opposition to this position. Do you know what? That goes to the heart of the challenge we have in the Labour party, which is too often issues are seen. It's the same with Brexit as to whether we adopt this people's vote or not, it's all seen through the prism of what you think of the leader, which ignores the actual issue at point and until we break out of that prison as a Labour party and also accept that we are a broad church and there are different opinions on things that don't just revolve around the leader, we're going to end up in this kind of ditch that we're in. All right, bring us up to date Lizzie on the script, our poison case. Back to Russia, we have to leap from this back to Russia now.