What you're proposing or what the President is proposing here does not sound like it's in keeping with American tradition when it comes to immigration. The Statute of Liberty says give me your tire, your poor, your huddled masses, you're in to breathe free. It doesn't say anything about speaking English or being able to be a computer programmer. Aren't you trying to change what it means to be an immigrant coming into this country if you're telling them you have to speak English? Can people learn how to speak English when they get here? Well, first of all, right now it's a requirement to be naturalized yet to speak English. So the notion that speaking English wouldn't be a part of immigration systems would be actually very A-historical. Secondly, I don't want to get off into a whole thing about history here, but the Statute of Liberty is a symbol of liberty and lightening the world. It's a symbol of American liberty lighting the world. The poem that you're referring to that was added later is not actually part of the original Statute of Liberty, but more fundamentally the history, but more fundamentally the history that that's not represent. I'm saying that in the country is a notion of the notion of the king. I'm saying the notion of, I'm sorry. No, it sounds like that sounds like a national park revisionism. No, the Statute of Liberty has always been a new question. Jim, let me ask you an up hope to the world. For people to say, Jim, do you believe people to this country? Jim, and they're not always going to speak English, even though they're not going to be highly skilled. They're not always being so many people. Jim, I appreciate your speech. Jim, I appreciate your speech. So let's talk about this. Jim, let's talk about this. In 1970, when we led in 300,000 people a year, was that violating or not violating the Statute of Liberty Law of the Land. In the 1990s, when it was half a million a year, was it violating or not violating the Statute of Liberty Law of the Land? Was it violating? When it was 700,000 years, tell me what years, tell me what years meet, tell me what years meet Jim Acosta's definition of the Statute of Liberty poem Law of the Land. So you're saying a million a year is the Statute of Liberty number. 900,000 violates it, 800,000 violates it. You're sort of bringing in press one for English philosophy here. Jim, immigration, and that's never true. For Jim. What the United States has been about, Steve. But you're also, your statements also shockingly, hey, a historical in another respect too. Which if you look at the history of immigration, it's actually ebbed and flowed. We've had periods of very large waves, followed by periods of less immigration and more immigration. And during the, we've had a period of immigration right now. It wants to build a wall. It's actually about a sweeping change to the immigration. Sure, Jim. You don't actually think that a wall affects green card policy. You couldn't possibly believe that, do you? Actually, the notion that you actually think immigration is at a historic wall. Before and before I'm population, the United States today, Jim. Jim. Exactly one Monday talking about how border crossings do you really? I want to be serious, Jim. Do you really see an end not in the difference between green card policy and illegal immigration? I mean, you really don't know that. You came to this country in 1962, right before the Cuban Missile Crisis, and obtained a green card. Yes. People who immigrate to this country eventually. People who immigrate to this country, not through Ellen Tye's life. Jim, as a factual question, do obtain a green card at some point. They do it through a lot of hard work. And yes, they may learn English as a second language later on in life. So, but this whole notion of well, they have to learn English before they get to the United States. Are we just going to bring in people from Great Britain and Australia? Jim, as actually, I often honestly say, I am shocked at your statement that you think that only people from Great Britain and Australia would know English. It's actually, it reveals your cosmopolitan bias to a shocking degree that in your mind, no, this is an amazing, this is an amazing moment. This is an amazing moment that you think only people from Great Britain or Australia would speak English. It's so insulting to millions of hard working immigrants who do speak English from all over the world. Jim, have you honestly, Jim, have you honestly never met an immigrant from another country who speaks English outside of Great Britain and Australia? Is that your personal experience? Of course there are people who come to this country. But that's not what you said. And it shows, it shows your cosmopolitan bias. And I just want to say, It's like to you're trying to engineer the racial and ethnic flow of people into this country. That is one of the most outrageous, insulting, ignorant, and foolish things you've ever said. And for you, that's still a really, the notion that you think that this is a racist bill is so wrong and so insulting. Jim, the reality is that the foreign-born population into our country has quadrupled since 1970. That's the fact. It's been mostly driven by green card policy. Now this bill allows for immediate nuclear family members to come into the country much as they were today. And then it adds an additional point space system. The people who have been hurt the most, the people who have been hurt the most by the policy you're advocating are apparently just unfettered uncontrolled migration. The people who have been hurt the most by the policy, the people who have been hurt the most by the policy that you're advocating are immigrant workers and minority workers and African-American workers and Hispanic workers. And in half of the American communities now you brought it up again. You said you wanted to have a conversation and not target. Is it going to be a target? What we want to do is say the African-American community, are you going to target? I'm not trying to be funny. Right. I know what you're saying. What you're saying is 100% correct. We want to help unemployed African-Americans in this country and unemployed workers of all backgrounds get jobs. And in situations like gym made, trying to ascribe nefarious motives to a compassion immigration measure designed to help newcomers and current arrivals alike is wrong. And this is a positive optimistic proposal that says 10 years, 20 years, 30 years from now, 10 years, 20 years, 30 years from now, we want to have an immigration system that takes care of the people who are coming here and the people who are already living here by having standards, by having a real clear requirement that you be able to support yourself financially, by making sure that employers can pay a living wage. And that's the right policy for our country. And it's the President's commitment to taking care of American workers. I apologize Jim if things got heated, but you did make some pretty rough insinuations. So thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. And I'll hand it over to Sarah. I think that what exactly is planned?