All right everybody, this is going to be a time to roll up your sleeves and dive into a challenge. And as you probably understand, the challenge is to create the best scenario to address climate change, meeting a whole range of goals. Hi everyone, my name is Josh. This is Oliver Hitchcock, my name is Nick Montes. My name is Rudraal. My name is Sid Shrikhan. Hi, I'm Christina and I'm here with Tilo Lu-Karan and Anna and we are St. Portable Energy. So these are our main results in key methodologies. As you can see, we reached two degrees C. We began phasing our carbon first with a carbon tax in 2020, a moderate one. And then we start phasing out coal, oil and natural gas in the years 2030, 40 and 55, respectively, that's based on their carbon intensities. So here's our scenario overview. As you can see, we were able to reach a temperature increase by 2100 of 2.0 degrees Celsius. We mainly tinker on the energy supply, on the tax subsidies, to achieve dominance of renewals in nuclear by the end of the century. So, I am very thrilled to announce as our winners, game number two. Congratulations. Congratulations to all. In reflecting on this exercise, we were surprised to see that adjusting the new tech breakthrough, had a much smaller effect than we expected, harkening to the fact that we cannot rely on a civil bullet, solve global warming. As part of the exercise, I was googling, like, basically, where current tax rates, current limits are on a lot of these energy sources. And I think I was disappointed to see that my original goal of taxing coal, and let's say $30 a ton, is really far from where the federal government currently sets its tax rate. So I think it just gives me motivation to spend pieces of my life pushing us toward that.