Certainly, you want to let me finish the question. I suggest a certain understanding on their part that you're going to stand for certain things when you're elected. The current mayor in this third term has managed to balance the budget in large measure on having put off negotiations with the major municipal unions. That delay is going to come to you next year. The new mayor is going to have to negotiate new contracts. As far as we can tell, none of the mayoral candidates are really discussing in much detail what that's going to look like, but it's not going to be pretty. The question is, in terms of the negotiations with the municipal workers unions, first of all, do you support their getting retroactive paying increases? Alternatively, do you support them stepping up and paying a portion of their health care costs going forward? If you don't support putting a squeeze on costs in one of those areas, where else in the city budget do you think we can get some savings in order to continue balancing the budget as is required each June 30th? Well, first of all, I do absolutely support workers who have worked for fair wages to be paid fair wages. I do understand also that there's a budget to balance. The city regularly operates with a $2 or $3 billion surplus. I also think that there are ways to look at savings. The city time scandal was a good example, which was basically a computer system that was being developed and was supposed to cost $50 million to develop in essence. The time punch card of a computerized program to check in and check out when you came to work. You can argue that $50 million maybe is too much to pay for equipment than a program like that, but the city actually ended up spending almost over half of $1 billion. So they went over budget by close to $500 billion. I've shown that I can stand up that I'm committed to oversight and accountability, and I would make sure to see if we couldn't save money to stop these types of over expenditures. And I would also work with those municipal unions. Maybe there's a payout period over a period of time. I think that frankly, the way that we restimulate economies is that we pay workers the wages that they deserve, and then they take those monies and spend them on buying someone dinner or going to a local movie or buy some popcorn to come watch the debate or whatever it is. It actually is helpful to restimulate the economy. I'm going to bring creative sensibility to that. And also I've been a small business owner for 20 years. And every single day I have the balanced budgets to make my business run, and I'll bring that expertise and knowledge as well to it. I have a question in answer to questions. Let's let Cory answer and we'll do some follow-up. Okay. Cory's going to get the chance to answer. We'll do a follow-up. So we don't know what the fiscal year outlook is going to look like until later this fall when OMB comes out with what they say the projections are. It's been talked about that there may be a $3.2 billion budget gap in the municipal budget. I believe last year's budget was $78 billion. I think we're absolutely right, Paul, that there are many unions that have not gotten an increase in pay. I think if you are a civil servant and you have served the city, you deserve to be paid fairly. But I don't think that we can say right now whether or not we can afford those. I think the bigger issue here with regard to our budget is that there have been all of these budget tricks that have been going on for too long. The mayor releases an executive budget in October of every year with beginning in November the council and the mayor then go through this kubuki dance from November until June. The mayor says I'm going to close 35 houses. The council says no, we're going to restore and not allow you to close. It's not the way to do the budget. We need to reform the budget process and how it actually works to have a real sense of where our money is going. Last year the mayor came up with a gimmick which was $700 million. He projected for taxing medallions that were supposed to be sold and used for our budget. There's a court case on that right now that still has that money in the mouth. There is a lot that needs to be done. I can say that when whoever gets in the council, we have to sit down with our colleagues with the administration and say, how do we make sure that New York City remains a place that has a good economy. I think part of the thing we need to do is stop talking about these regressive taxes and let's talk about taxing the top 1% of earners in this city to actually pay for social services like universal pre-K. I think that's the conversation we have and we take some of that money and pay for these other good things we're talking about. Okay, quick follow-up to both of you just a yes or no. Either of you willing to ask the municipal unions to either want or go a portion of their retroactive pay increase or to chip in on their health care cost. It's premature. I would want to stick to them. I wouldn't be able to say one more. I agree. I think part of it is you have to sit down with the letter negotiating it and figure it out. It's too intricate of a thing. Okay, we're going to jump in now and have candidates ask each other a question.