Controversy over conversational AI tools, AIFY, tech. AI tools like Google's Bard and OpenAI's chat GPT, which claim to provide human-like responses by accessing large databases of content, have been both appreciated and criticized. Critics argue this database access could harm privacy, security and intellectual property rights. Plus, these tools may use user input to personalize future interactions, potentially storing individual preferences and query phrasing. Generative AI tools use the internet to process data, but they never say where they store it physically. Data privacy policies, limitations and compliance. Generative AI tools usually have data privacy policies in place. For instance, OpenAI's chat GPT gives you the option to delete conversations, all data, or your account within 30 days. On the flip side, Google's Bard collects conversations and user feedback, but insists it won't access sensitive personal info from users Google service accounts. Obtaining consent for sharing client data with internally operated systems as a syng, but public chatbots pose a challenge. But before organizations can use it in their mainstream settings, the tech needs more development, and the quality, consistency of responses should be monitored. The makers of generative AI models should give businesses access to fine tune and control these tools so they fit their unique requirements. More importantly, ethical considerations, bias mitigation, and fairness in generating responses must be addressed. Thanks for watching, visit our website for more AI news.