So I'm here with Gary Johnson, I'm running for public evaluation. And you are a former governor of Mexico. Can you tell that you are a proof about what you did in Mexico? Well, I think first of all, I was really good at the stewardship of tax dollars. There was a penny-pinching dollar. I vetoed 750 bills while I was governor of Mexico. I left New Mexico with a billion plus surplus and back to the vetoes only two over it. So it made a difference when it came to billions of dollars with expensive people. It made a difference when it came to government telling you and I will be put or couldn't deal with the members. No, it's a broad or a humble deal. Just a few people, you know, government that's not going to work in the area that's not typically something to hear of life. Please, I will probably get a prime hearing. How many differentiated was there? Which may be ever... I can't hear you again. Well, I am different when it comes to believing that Republicans are first and foremost about pocketbook issues. And that's why I'm Republican. When it comes to the social agenda, I believe that the government should empower you and I to make decisions that only affect our lives. And that we're best suited to make those decisions not the government. So I think I differentiate myself from what would be described by the rest of the world as a Republican, narrowly focused social agenda. I do not have a social agenda. My agenda has to do with dollars and cents. And when it comes to agendas, I want to empower all of us to make the decisions that I think only you and I have the ability to make. I would love to see the Republican Party as the party's choice. The Republicans would always come down on empowering the individual to make the choices that only an individual can make. The truth is, the individual is something that I like and I like. But you mentioned dollars and cents. We had a back-up, political background picture. Obviously, the audience on national stage, the United States, the rest of the support here, on national stage, the government finances are not ready. We have a back-up machine that makes a federal problem. But how do you want to address the budget crisis that's gone on as it speaks? The debt crisis basically does not allow us to make a power in the US background. So we need to stop printing money. We need to sweet-eat to balance the federal budget. I would not currently vote for an increase in the debt limit. I would veto about legislation. I think we need to force not printing money. And for all the calamity that will go along with enforcing legislation, I just suggest that it will never be easy to do it. That, as opposed to any distance down the future, we have control of the situation now. A bond market collapse may present itself as being something cloud of control. But I would not suggest that that's in the cards. It's going to happen unless we actually balance the federal budget. And then when it comes to shops, I would say enact the fair tax, fair tax, dot or work for those that haven't looked at this. But eliminate business to business tax, eliminate corporate income tax, eliminate income tax for you and I, I think many one time consumption tax that takes place in all other federal tax. So we're also talking about abolishing the IRS too. I think it makes sure that every bank that is built in there where it would create all the free-down foot off-sets, burden of the action people, option of poverty line. So, yes, yes, yes, regressive. So everybody gets covered up, gets covered up to the poverty level. And it would be fair. And it would also stimulate state-owned. Your position in the law, the crack I know was a lot different than many other public institutions who opposed that for the beginning. What you proposed today about the course of that is getting the state in the back. If we get out tomorrow, I was opposed to Iraq from the start. I thought that there was, I never thought there was a military threat from Iraq. And if there would have been, if there would have been weapons of mass destruction, I thought we could have owned the roof. We would have the military surveillance capability to see that happening. And if it would have happened, it could have gone and it didn't. I thought that if we went into Iraq, we would find ourselves in a civil war to which there would be no end. Afghanistan, initially, I thought that was totally warranted. We were attacked. We attacked back. But after being in Afghanistan for six months, we effectively wiped out. Okay, that was ten years ago. We're building roads, schools, bridges, highways and hospitals in Iraq and Afghanistan. And other places in the world don't we have those same needs here. And we're bankrupted. We're borrowing 43 cents, printing 43 cents out of every dollar that we're spending. That's the phrase Libya. Where in the United States Constitution does it say that because we don't like the foreign dictator, we should go in and topple the foreign dictator. I don't think it's in there. As it is, we're at a present against the side of the D.A. But we have no congressional authorization. Have we injected ourselves into a civil war in Libya? Don't five other countries that we've released right now, qualified on that same intervention? Is there no end to our military involvement in other countries? Can we, I advocate, cut a military spending by 43 percent? Can we provide strong national defense for this country? And cut military spending by 43 percent? I think the operative word here is defense. And yes, we can. We can't afford offense. And we can't afford to nationals. Let's dry that up. And so, it's kind of a tough time to get a major much more than you. If you're an honest, just to round off what's your strategy done for the endgame? What can employers, who can be happy interest in one of the states in the United States? You said the focus is not in the country. So what you've got is a spectrum of view. Just that I'm going to be around. I'm going to be around. I'm going to be in the Hampshire every couple of weeks for several days, every couple of weeks. Talking to as many groups as I possibly can. And putting my chips on the table here in New Hampshire, it's a great political environment here in this state where people really, this is my observation. People really do go out of their way to hear what a candidate has to say and to custom discuss it. Yeah, thank you. you