What's happening, which is that we're collectively accelerating the rate in which we learn things, and the chief way that we learn as a species is to the scientific method. And I wrote one of the first histories of the scientific method itself, and my point in writing it was that in the next 50 years, the scientific method is going to change more than it has in the last 500 years. That the scientific method itself is evolving and accumulating new techniques and that science, the very method, science itself, not just the stuff that science discovers, the process of science is also changing, which is so exciting. It is because collectively we are learning how to learn in more ways and faster and deeper. And the consensus mechanisms are absolutely and foremost, among all the changes that are coming in the site of the method, it's going to be AI's. Artificial intelligence is always safe for all, because there's many different varieties of them and they are going to be instrumental in helping us because our human minds are not general purpose intelligence, that's complete myth. There is no general purpose intelligence. We have very, very specific, weird combinations of cognition that we're involved for our planet. And they're probably insufficient to understand dark matter and dark energy to discover how they work. And we're going to need to do a two-step process. We're going to event other kinds of minds that think differently than we do, that work with us together collectively to figure these out. So that's sort of what's in store for me. Only point about that is there's a collective meta-learning that we're doing. But there's also the individual assignment that we have as individuals to meta-learn. And that's in my opinion much further behind, in a sense that we're not even aware of the issues. We're not aware that this is our job, that we need to learn how we learn ourselves or to optimize our own learning. And there's no curriculum that I've seen anywhere in the world that teaches you or me how to optimize and understand our own learning. Because each of us learn a little differently for different things. And what we want to be able to arrive at is to know fully well how we would best learn a new language, how we would best learn a new physical skill, how we would best learn a new discipline, how many hours of rest we need between this, how much we have to devote to the practice. We don't know. We have no idea. And this is what I think schools should really be teaching. When you graduate, what you're graduating with is a degree in self-learning. A degree in how to optimize your own learning so that you know yourself the best patterns and techniques, the best way to learn all the different things and ways that need to be learned. And you know what they are. And you've been practicing, you've been tested, and you've been helped by teachers to optimize your own learning. That is what high school college should be.