If you espoused to the idea that Jesus was born of a virgin birth, then Jesus could not have had male chromosomes. Therefore, Jesus had only female chromosomes and presented as masculine. So Jesus was non-binary. And in terms of male and female, and the Hebrew, the word that was used for and describes a spectrum. Male and female and everything in between. I am not an expert on Christian theology, but my understanding is that the idea is that Jesus was both fully human and also fully God. Is this correct? Christians? Anywhere around here? Yup. Yes, this is correct. Okay. If that is indeed the case, then Jesus would have had to have the full chromosomal slate in order to be fully human. This means that if Jesus was male, he was male. That's a man. Now, let's talk about the bizarre invocation of Hebrew here. There is no word for and in Hebrew. There's a prefix in Hebrew for and. It's letter V of and in Hebrew means the same thing that and in English does. It means this thing and that thing. That's not mean, a full spectrum. That is incredibly silly. That is bad Hebrew grammar.