My name is Siliwul Hakhkar, Director of the International Center for Climate Change and Development based in Dhaka and also Senior Fellow at the International Institute for Environment and Development based in London. I'm going to talk about the status of the issue of adaptation in the UN framework conventional climate change and particularly what the issues are going into the Paris Agreement. Just to give a little bit of a background, adaptation has now been very well recognised in the UNFCC process. It took some time for that to happen, but in the last few years since the Marrakeh Shakorps at COP7 in 2001, it has been accepted and in Cancun at COP16, we have agreed something called the Cancun Adaptation Framework which provides quite an elaborate programme of actions on adaptation, it's set up an adaptation committee to oversee these actions and a lot has been done since then. For example, these developed countries have been supported to do the MAPA's national adaptation programmes of action. They are now being supported to do NAPS national adaptation plans which are not just for the least developed countries but other developing countries and indeed for the developed countries as well. And so a lot is happening on adaptation. There's also something called the Nairobi Work Program on Adaptation that brings together the non-governmental partners together to share knowledge and experience on this. So as I said, quite a lot happening on adaptation on the ground and in the UNFCC process. With regard to Paris, the issue that is coming out is a demand put forward by the African negotiators group for an adaptation goal, very similar to the mitigation goal. And this has caused a little bit of a controversy because while a mitigation goal is something that is fairly well understood in terms of a temperature target or in terms of reduction of emissions, an adaptation goal is not clear as to exactly what that would entail. Global adaptation takes place at the local level, at the national level and so agreeing a global goal is somewhat difficult. So there are three ways in which this can be addressed. Firstly, the easiest goal to adopt for adaptation would be simply funding adaptation. So we could say for example, they should be $50 billion dollars a year to fund adaptation starting from 2020. Develop countries have agreed to $100 billion. They have not agreed to how that $100 billion would be divided between mitigation and adaptation. So an agreement could look like $50 billion a year, half of that would go for adaptation. Another type of adaptation goal could be a capacity building goal. So we could have a goal that all countries are capacitated within a certain time frame, say five to 10 years, to be able to develop their own adaptation strategies and plans and to start implementing those adaptation strategies and plans. That might be one way to do it. And finally, one way of looking at it would be to reframe adaptation in other terms, for example, in terms of vulnerability. So we could have a vulnerability reduction target. Volumability is somewhat easier to measure. We know the parameters of vulnerability both the physical as well as the economic ones. We can look at them, develop indicators and measure reduction in vulnerability and set up goal for reducing them. And the final way in which one might do it is to use the term resilience rather than adaptation and enhancing resilience as a resilience goal. And this is something that some people, particularly the UN Secretary General, is interested in exploring further how we might have a resilience goal coming out at the end in Paris. But these are all still up for discussion and I will be reporting on them as we go towards Paris and in Paris, I'll be reporting every day on the negotiations and hopefully we'll have a good conclusion on the 11th of December in Paris.