You wanted to address the corruption trial of Mark Chevarella. Yes, I did. If you go to my website and it's www.vuluserandcountyraero.com, all one word, and click on the blog section, you'll see that I wrote prior to the trial, and it's all dated, it's been posted there since then. I predicted that the U.S. Attorney's Office would, in fact, do some sort of damage control during the trial of Chevarella. And what I mean by that is very specifically, I knew that once they opened the can of worms, that tied in the payments to children being incarcerated, and opened that can of worms that all hell was going to break loose, and that the U.S. Attorney's Office would have to do something to try to minimize the damage, because there would be so much collateral damage, because these were not two rogue judges operating in some little podung town, callcrackin' town. These people operated with almost the full knowledge of the Judicial Conduct Board. They had over 40 complaints filed against them, and one specifically that probably outlined everything except the cash payments, and they did nothing about it. They knew the JCB knew what was going on here, and for the U.S. Attorney to touch on that subject and open up that can of worms, I think, would have started, and I predicted it would have started an avalanche of additional investigations that would have just spiraled totally out of control from this area. So what the U.S. Attorney's Office did to my everyone's total surprise was they did not put a single, not one sentence, not one witness, not one exhibit. Nothing to substantiate the balance or the bulk of the 27 charges that he was found not guilty on. They didn't put any of it. At the last minute, I mean, here was Sandra Brulo in the next room waiting to go on the stand to start that segment of testimony to address those issues. They had addressed the tax evasion. They had addressed the bribes from Miracle and from Powell. They had addressed all of it. Now they were going to open up that can of worms, and it was either U.S. Attorney Peter Smith made the decision or a superior to him made him make the decision. But there was a decision made and they rested their case at that point and everybody gasped. And the jury did what the jury was required to do. They could not substantiate those charges. There was no evidence present. So when they came out of the courthouse and Mark Chevrolet and his attorney asserted that this was not a cash for kids case where they correct. Well, we all know what the jury is. Well, we all know what it was. And we all know that it was a kids for cash, cash for kids. And we all know that he was found not guilty of those charges by a jury. And the big question is why and the heck did that happen? Because we all know what it was. You want me to say it? They kept the can closed. That's exactly what they did. They kept the can closed. Now, whether I researched Mr. Smith's background and he has an impeccable background. If anybody I would want on my side, this is the guy. The guy is incredible. But I think if everybody looks at what's been happening since I criticized him from day one. I said in my blog that a person from Luzern County has been a person investigating corruption in Luzern County. He is from Luzern County. He was born and raised here. He went to a local college here. And he went off and did wonderful things. And he has a fantastic record. But if I were an FBI agent, I almost did go into the FBI. I went through the state police academy from municipal officers. I was recruited. But if I were an FBI agent in Scranton right now, I would have to be a lawyer or a trial. There have to be some very disgruntled agents up there. Because they did a heck of a job. They really did. And I really wish a few of them would reach out to me and talk to me. It's 1150 AWI. We have the break for the Bloomberg Market Minute. So stick around for the ending of the show. You're listening on 910 and Scranton 980. Looks very 1300 Hazelton and 103.1 FM. As for the tying up of the loose ends, what would you like to leave us with today? It basically is, you know, I no longer have a dog in this fight. OK, I don't live here anymore. I've talked one of my children into leaving the area. I'm working on the other, my other daughter, to get the heck out of here. I have family here. My roots are here. I have very mixed emotions. I mean, I could very well just, I live 20 minutes from the beach right now. And I really don't need any of this. But I have an obligation, I feel, to the other, the next generation, to leave things better than the way it was when I was here. And we all have that obligation. It is on our shoulders. It's not somebody else's responsibility. It's not there's nothing we can do about it. It's not any of that. We really have to demand it. And we have to demand it of our legislator. Anybody that has any pull with Senator Lisa Baker, I've sent her my book. I've sent her emails. I have criticized her. I have coddled her. I have tried to prompt her in many, many ways. I've called her office. And I can't get a response out of this woman. And I think that, you know what I mean? She's been wanting to take the lead on this. And I'm turned into someone very critical of what she's doing now. In one room she did, but you're saying that some of the things that she proposed were somewhat... Demanding attorneys be present. Yeah, demanding attorneys be present at every hearing is fine, except that the ones that were present at the Chiverella hearings weren't allowed to speak. Okay, so that's great. That doesn't really do a lot. You know, it's maybe well intended, but there's so much more. Why isn't she insisting on an investigation of the judicial conduct board? Absolutely insisting on it. I believe that she has been somewhat critical of them, but again, I don't... Let me repeat this. I don't think it should be at the behest of private citizens to take up a petition drive to get things done in Harrisburg when we're paying lawmakers to do it. I admire people that do things like that, but where are our lawmakers? And what would make them move on something? We know they have to work. They have to row together because that's the way they work. But the judicial conduct board, time and time again, has been called out. And sometimes they've tried to hide behind their attorneys. They did not want to testify at that Inter-Branches Commission on Juvenile Justice. They fought tooth and nail not to be there. Right. So what kind of body is this? Is it a rogue body? Is it a body that is just a two congenial with the people that's investigating? I think that the two of us can concur that it absolutely is, and somebody needs to put a stop to it. Yeah, absolutely. There's no doubt. There is no doubt whatsoever. And what we're attempting to do, maybe this idea of the petition, I agree with you. I don't really sign a lot of petitions in my life. I'm very select. But with this, we're going to go and embarrass a lot of legislators, because we're going to make sure that they go on record. One way or the other, either supporting this or not supporting it. So we're going to make our legislators or your legislators do their job. What they should have done before we private citizens had to do something like this. You're still looking for the information to take, though. So you're suggesting people email you at jcbcomplaintsatlive.com. That's correct. So you're still... Do you talk to Jean still at all? I have not. You should. He is in my book. You should have absolutely. I really... He exhibits the bizarre by doing bizarre things like the pink pig at the courthouse and things like that. But man, you want to talk about somebody that's out there actually slaying the windmills. Yeah, he is. He's a windmill killer. Very ho-ho. Thanks for joining us. It was a pleasure to have you in the studio today. You'll be at the Barnes & Noble as we've told the people on Sunday at two in the Reen Hub Plaza. So I hope a lot of people do come out and talk to you. Those of you who have tried with the JCB, JCB Complaintsatlive.com, if you want to send the complaints, so that you have a body of evidence when you bring the petition forward. And you can say, here's one, here's one, here's one, here's one, here's one, here's one, here's one. Yes. And the two sentence reply pretty much, go pound sand, pal. You know, you've got to finish up with that. We are finished for the day. I'd like to thank Larry for being here, because I didn't tell the audience, but I got home at quarter of two last night and really beat. So it was great to have a co-host on the show. Thank you. Thank you. You are listening to W.I. OK. But has the news, then it is the Rushland, Russia Corbid in this afternoon to talk more about another corruption trial in Blackwonak County. So stay tuned. You're listening on 910 and Scranton 980. Wilkesbury 1300 Hazelton and 103.1 FM. You