Any time you step out of sort of the accepted academic narrative, you're going to take some heat, something happened, and it was significant. Look, we're talking about truths here. I was trusted to do the work at the Pentagon after 9-11. The government assigned me to do that work. Hi, we're so happy to be here with you. Can you please introduce yourself for our viewers and tell us what it is that you do? My name is Scott Walter and I'm a forensic geologist by profession and a Templar historian researcher by profession two, I guess. From the geological point of view, do you know anything about the 12,000 year cycles? About the procession of the Equinoxes. Actually, it's a 26,000 year long cycle to complete the whole thing, to go through all of the 12 primary constellations of the zodiac in the eastern sky, at sunrise, on the spring Equinoxes when they measure it. And so I'm very familiar with it. Let me ask you a question, Olga. Do you realize right now we're in a very important time of procession? Yes, and that's why I'm asking you. Right now, so we know we've studied the fact that Earth goes, our solar system goes through cycles. It's 12,000 year cycle, 24,000 year cycles. Some people say more or less. And they could tell by the ice cores that every 12,000 years, some kind of disasters happen on our planet. And right now, we've entered that cycle as well and we can see it. So we just wanted to see if you also know about this from your studies. Yes, I am aware of that. I think you're talking about the younger driest period and a friend Graham Hancock recently produced a series where he talked ancient apocalypse is the name of the show. And I think he makes a very compelling case. And I think the evidence is there that there was a significant, either a comet, a meteorite, some type of extraterrestrial event that was catastrophic to the Earth and definitely impacted human cultures at that time and had significant fallout. But I love the fact that Graham asked these questions, even though he's taking significant criticism because of it. But I know what that's like. Anytime you step out of sort of the accepted academic narrative, you're going to take some heat. But you know what I do is the same thing that Graham does. He stands behind the facts and that's really your foundation. But you also admit that you don't know everything that we need more data about this question and others. So it is a significant thing and it's important to talk about it and hopefully academics will take the right approach and be more open-minded that they've been in the past because something happened and it was significant. And we can see that something happened every 12,000 years. That's what's concerning and our next question is, have you dealt with censorship where your channel got deleted or shadow banned on masks and social media? Such as YouTube. Have I dealt with it? I've been whitewashed from the internet. I'll give you an example. So I wrote a book. It's on our table. The first of four books about this subject matter. But the first one was called the Kensington Roonstone, compelling new evidence and it's 574 pages and it solved the question. Answered the question definitively, it is an authentic artifact which raises a whole bunch of other questions which is what the rest of these, the next three books were about. But if you go on Wikipedia for example, you and Google the Kensington Roonstone, you won't see my name, you won't see any of my four books and it's a simple fact of the matter right now. It's not bragging. It's just truth, right? There's nobody walking the planet right now that knows more about this artifact than me. But none of my research, none of my books are on there. But you know what is on the Wiki site? A book that was written by an academic, Alice Beck-Keeho, professor of archaeology at University of Wisconsin, a friend of mine who wrote a book a year after our Kensington Roonstone, compelling new evidence book, was published and in her book she wrote about our book and she said we solved it. That one is cited on Wiki but not the book that she's talking about. And I don't think they understand what I do for a living. I do material forensic investigations for a living. I do the scientific method. All day every day for 40 years now, I understand the process but a lot of these soft scientists, people in the humanities disciplines, which are wonderful disciplines, don't get me wrong. But they're not trained in the scientific method but yet they're criticizing me because the science that I've applied to these artifacts and concluded something different than they did. And I've said many times, look, I'm happy to sit down with you. I'm not perfect. I make mistakes, point out where I made a mistake and I'll fix it, right? That's not the issue. I didn't make a mistake. They just didn't like the result. Well, tough hop. Life doesn't always go your way, right? So that's my position and I'm standing by it. One thing is when I googled you, there was not a lot of information. So I thought maybe you're dealing with this. And a second thing, on creative society, a lot of our channels got deleted off social media for no reason at all. How dare you tell the truth? Yes, nothing. And this is in multiple languages, not just in one language without any violations or anything like that. How important is it to you think today to nationalize Google, to have it belong to the people instead of have this one tire and that controls everything? Well, I mean, to be honest with you, I don't know what the answer is, but I think that there's a certain amount of monitoring that needs to be done. I mean, there's dark things that happen and I just don't think that that should just be allowed to go without some type of oversight. But look, we're talking about truths here. And we don't all have to agree on what it is that we're talking about or what I'm talking about. But I think we need to respect everybody's opportunity to at least have a voice and say what it is, get your evidence out there and then let people decide if it makes any sense or not. I was trusted to do the work at the Pentagon after 9-11. The government assigned me to do that work. I like to think they did that because I kind of know what I'm doing, right? I've worked on a lot of different projects, murder cases and fatals and all that. And so it's okay for me to work on that. But for some reason, when I work on these controversial artifacts, I'm some moron that doesn't know what he's talking about, some fringe geologist. And so there's some hypocrisy there, in my opinion. And I don't, like you said, I think it should be out there. We should all have the opportunity to talk about this in an open forum. Censorship should not be there. And I'm not sure what to do about it necessarily, but all I can tell you is I'm going to keep talking and saying what I believe to be truth and the implications of that truth. And some people aren't going to like it, but like I said, sometimes life doesn't go your way. Yes. Thank you so much for being with us today. We're really appreciated. We'll keep up the good work, you guys. Thank you.