I think it also sometimes has a natural health feeling and in many ways is strong. It could be strong. It happens from a few years ago, I had grown since my health to the 27th and 18th of the last. We're down to a realm of life which is as long as you can go without losing your body or without having a downgrade or a re-bond rate. Our pension fund is, we don't want to think communities' pension fund is fully fundable. So it's not like, you know, when we made that commitment to our own employees, we kept it. And to everyone's credit, every council, every mayor over the years is service. And in all of these faculty and partners of heart, they're not messed with that. They're not succumbed to the temptation to pay the pension fund. I think what you need to do really good to be more attractive is I think we need to stabilize the tax rate. People who are on the rest of the notes on the monocity, they want to see stability. They don't want to see things that are not going to happen. They don't want to see your bill rates looking like a sign waving. They don't want to see your fund balances go up and then get down. They want to see the fund balances solid state growth and tax rates. You want to see kind of class all. And I think what I'm sure I can do is get that curve to kind of pull down. Now unfortunately, I don't have a last word to tell us. So the budget you get and the rate you get is what they give you. I've had some disagreements with that. And I think they tend to dip into fund balance a little more than it should be. I think they tend to over project revenues and under project expenses that is really in the end human opinion for that. So those are things I get to be straight out of the strength of. Thank you. I agree overall financial health of the city is this solid. But I was interesting to be some of the things that the mayor just said. He said he doesn't want to, you know, most people don't want to see taxes going up and down too much. They don't want to see the exact vote. I would say taxes have gone up consistently until this year. The exception of a nine when the council lowered the mayor's proposed tax increase to zero. This year we actually lower than even further. But every single year I was six years in office with the exception of this one. The mayor proposed substantial tax increase. Not a little, but a substantial one in many of the views. The other thing is that he doesn't have the last word of the budget. That is true. The council gets the last word of the budget. As I mentioned, out of all those six years the council lowered in every single instance the mayor's proposed budget. So while he doesn't get the last word, every budget the council finally passed was the lower of the tax rate was lower than the budget in which the mayor proposed. Finally, just heard the mayor said that he believes the council tends to over project revenue and under project. That one really sort of struck me because one of the problems with the pension fund specifically this year was that the pension fund was estimated and getting a better return from the market than I think we're realistically going to be today. And what that does is it balances your budget on paper. You can throw in any number you want, whether it's a belt, whether it's reality. Are we going to realize that 8% return on a pension fund this year is probably not going to happen. The other thing is the fund balance. The fund balance, the mayor has criticized the council for repeatedly dipping into it. This year we did take a little bit of money out of the fund balance. But the mayor did the same thing. A year after year after year, he has told us that if the council takes money out of the fund balance, then the city is going to be facing a bond rate and down rate and a serious loss of financial help. What ended up happening was he proposed his budget history. He did the exact same thing and took money out of the fund balance. So I'm not quite sure where the history and where the answer got together, but I think that what we can do forward is work to reduce taxes for our owners, particularly for our seniors, because we don't want anyone using their home. We want to make sure that we're aggressively recruiting businesses and growth industries that pay good job with the student, that pay good wages and have very good health benefits so that people can take care of their families. And we can continue to grow the middle class and try to make a middle class for the healthy. And if we can take care of the middle class, then the city's finances will follow suit. The first thing is the pension fund is not part of the city general fund, so it's growth or whatever rejects is not a fact budget at all because that's a off budget idea. In terms of the fund balance and the fund balance contributions, historical cities take account of the contributions towards every budget and the fund balance. I usually, more than just one of the finance director, it is an appropriate to contribute. The fact that I have raised the fund balance from 9 to almost 18, during my 10th year in law office, allow the finance director to allow it to permit as a large amount. The problem is the council is always taking it into more, the fund balance is not going down, and it was still taking those amounts. So I think we need to grow that again.