Alright guys, give me 32 here, check it out. We're sitting over here in the Freedom Studios. I left everything at house. My camera, everything. So this is going to be recorded on the phone without any interruption or edits or anything else like that. Color might be off a little bit. But in any case, don't forget about bridge. The gap, the shop. Look at this thing. Just a real good look. This is handmade with wood. Stained. Absolutely gorgeous. You see the back of it. A little wire hanging right here. Aldrin told her I'd help her build her business just by doing a little shout out for it at the beginning of a couple of videos. But in the case, I'll put the link down below. Aldrin, thank you very much for sending this out. But the reason I wanted to do this video, I haven't done a video for at least a week. We got to get back into this swing of things, man. I want to ask you a question. When we first start this video, should your neighbors know how many or what type of guns you own? Put the link down below or no link. But to comment down below. Interesting article. I think it was firearm chronicles. He keeps osing these things on Instagram and I see those. And I do a little research and I get the original article. But anyway, this came out in response to a, I guess, an article that was put in the New York Post or whatever it was. Should you know if your neighbor owns a gun? Personally, I can give a crap. I'm that kind of person. I don't really care what you own. I don't care if you own a cannon. I don't give a shit if how many shotguns or whatever else you have. And I honestly, I don't feel like it's anybody else's damn business what I own. But I'm going to read this to you because this is what the liberal left. This is how they think. Should your neighbor owns good? The wither case highlights the importance of knowing where and how gun owners obtain a permit. There are all reason for this whole thing and I will get into it in a minute is they are, they feel like they should know how or what the criteria are about how you obtained your permit. And this is reason why their guys of what they want to know. Okay, so let's go on to talk about this thing. Last year in San Francisco, Chronicle submitted a government records request to nearby counties for information about individuals who had applied for and obtained a concealed weapon. That's funny because San Francisco. Yeah, the journalist goal was not to expose those individuals, but to understand whether there was patterns and how gun licenses were being given out that might endanger the public. Well, first of all, why is it that a journalist, their goal is to figure out how permits were issued and how they relate to dangers to the public. That, that to me is just a one-sided argument anyway. You let me know. Under the state law of counties were legally required to turn over the information. The one county sheriff took the Facebook to alert the public other requests and sent a letter to each permit, holding it as office was about to release their personal information to the Chronicle. Could you imagine if the community you lived in all of a sudden they said, we are going to ban certain types of firearms, which has happened to Springfield Illinois. And we'll sudden some, I don't know, journalists go, well, you know, because the freedom, I can go ahead and get that information. So if they don't come forward, we can go ahead and figure out who has them. Okay. The reporter in the newspaper received threats of violence. Well, no shit. That's what happens when you start clapping and mess up with people's guns. So many, the security had to be increased in the newsroom. It's an old story. How do you balance the public's right to know if their neighbors own guns versus gun-alters privacy rights? As far as I'm concerned, my neighbors have zero right to know what I own regardless of what it is. Are there armed deal-dose? I don't know. What the hell? Why is it there right to know what I own and what I don't own? Following the horrific Newtown, Connecticut mass shooting in 2012 and neighboring suburban newspaper New York tried to give readers that information, publishing an interactive map, revealing the names and addresses of handgun permit holders in two counties. But the paper received intense backlash. So kidding. Why would they not? It's absolutely disgusting. And gun advocates successfully pushed for legislation to broadly limit the disclosure of gun ownership records under New York's law. It's disgusting because they go in here and start talking about, well, you know, just because there's another side effect that if people know who owns guns, that might protect them from, well, I don't know, being robbed. Well, it also exposes these individuals to anyone who needs a gun where you live and how many guns or whatever permits you own. So it's no surprise that most states have moved to restrict detailed gun permit records from the public eye. Massachusetts is no exception. I guess it says it in there. But that's there. Okay, but this is a case for making. At least some gun licensing information public and not some members of the public can keep tabs on guns, but might be in their neighborhood. Last week's apparent hate crime in with her. I guess I'm not sure if the with her. Massachusetts went to North Carolina where a man armed with two guns shot and killed two people. Raised questions about transparency around gun permitting records. The lack of public information about gun permit holders makes it harder to judge how well the police chiefs who issued those permits are using their authority and to hold them accountable when they make the wrong call. There's always the potential for mistakes. But the last time I heard it is not a journalist job to hold anyone accountable when especially when it comes to the Second Amendment rights. This is the disgusting part about what generalist think in these name. This one early. These times. The shooter who was gunned down by police had a license to carry yet little is known about who made the licensing authority was in this case and how many decisions how how the decision was made. Here's another reason why full secrecy may not be a good idea. Gun license applications in the common well have been on the rise in recent years. This is where they could scare. Okay, that's my liberal voice. Seriously. It's not determining any kind of sexual orientation or anything. It's just how I think most liberals talk. Okay, especially those they were in the academic world in 2020 applications double to more than 54,000 more than that previous two years combined Massachusetts allows perspective gun owners to apply for six year license to carry at the local police department where they live and have their place of business. And even after an applicant pays a fee and needs to require a message as pass and say if you course local police can still deny the license that's because there is a measurable flexibility that resides in a local police. The standard suitability built in process. Here's one in my view police chiefs have a high level of discretion said to a state representative David Linsky who has been involved in gun prevention legislation will be can heal. What is gun prevention legislation is that just to prevent you the homeowner or anybody else from ever honing a gun. Some departments do extend some social media searches while others don't. Linsky said it really does vary from department to department. There's a bit of judgment. But it's not unfettered judgment said William Brooks the chief of police in Norwood. In the end the vast majority of applications are granted still even gun rights advocates themselves sometimes grumble about the mysteries of gun permitting process that's so reliant on an individual chief's decision. This is true chief may not give you a permit to carry or buy a gun because he might not like you this bullshit. Second amendment should not be friends. This is the one that chaps my ass. You know what I like to say maybe as with many things around gun control though there's a little data to guide us much less. Any proof that burglaries would increase if records became publicly available. Think about that. These are jackasses who think it's okay to go ahead and make your public records or your records of what you own as far as fire are public. Well why don't we just tell them what kind of abortions you had in the past you dumb. Clearly there are some scenarios where public disclosure would be harmful domestic violence victims for instance but it's just as plausible to imagine crooks will be less likely to break into homes if they know the resident is armed. To further protect gun owners records would also not need to be in to indicate precisely what kind of fire arm a permit holder owns. Guys this is all a guys all they want to do is they want to figure out who owns fire arms and that's it but they're trying to figure out a plausible method or a reason to why it is necessary that the public knows what you own and that's disgusting. So with that being said we're going to hopefully do some more videos like this man this is actually kind of nice using the phone instead of the big old camera that I normally have to haul around. Anyway with that being said let me know what your thoughts are down below this afternoon we're going to take these guys out this goes to my CMMG Banshee mark nine these are the SMG Dura we call these things Dura Mac 33 round max except this time we're going to do the rare breeds trigger oh yeah folks go to 132 like the video please give it a thumbs up. Subscribe and have a good time support red wine blue god bless America got us as men women uniform 2474 freedom is not free I'm out of here y'all be good.