The only point is that you can defeat my argument very simple. You simply have to give one account of Mecca on a map or be mentioned anywhere before 600 AD. That's what you got to do. The earliest map we have of the carber that has the... No, the earliest mention we have of the carber is from 741 AD. That's 100 years after Muhammad died. You're... That's a good methodology. Just tell me where you're going. But let me... You're going and forget pardon the pan. You're going up for a time. It's work as gospel. They did not traverse the Mediterranean, the Middle East, the subcontinent and the far east in terms of China. If you're in Perturte did, Markopolo did. You're not even if we ignore 1000 years ago, whatever. Look right up to the time of Muhammad. Because according to your narrations, there would have been pagans who would have been circling the carber at the time. But we have no evidence of that. You can find records in China. Not even NASA saying that you've seen the facts in the moon that are consistent. The moon... No, that's a lie. In your lying or you're not telling the truth? I'm looking to it right now. NASA has been asked about this and they said there is no evidence the moon was once split in half and then we joined.