Layovers suck. There's really no way getting around it. It's almost always better to book a direct flight to the country you're actually trying to get to. But in some circumstances, layovers can be kind of enjoyable. If it happens to land you in a layover country at the right time, where you can go out and actually enjoy a bit of activity in that country. But other than that, layovers generally suck. So whenever I have a trip that requires a layover and there's just no way to get around it. What I would do is just follow the airlines routing, except instead of doing taking a layover flight, I would basically book two separate legs. I would book the leg to the layover country. I would enjoy spending a little bit of time in that country, maybe a day or two. And then I would book the leg, the quote unquote layover leg to the next country. And that allows me to basically get a little extra out of that same trip. Now, sometimes the country that's being layover is not when you want to go to. So I would play with the rowdings that the airlines offer until I find one that lays me over in a country that I do. I would enjoy traveling in. That being said, sometimes a long flight may have a direct flight, but I would purposely lay myself over. Like for example, Australia to the United States, Los Angeles to Melbourne is 16 hours. I would purposely lay myself over in like Honolulu. And basically spent a little time under the sun, makes the trip for a lot more enjoyable. Well, thank you for listening. Please help like and subscribe. Thank you.