Thank you so much for being here, Ms. Cush. As my colleague, Congressman Costa is saying, is very dry out in California right now, and those conditions pinpoint the need to have more storage to take advantage of what years like last year. And I know that many of us are eagerly awaiting to see in here's list of projects for wind act funding. Do you have a timeline when the Department of Plants is sending that list up to Congress? I think we're going to make the deadline. I think it's supposed to be maybe next month. Great, just. And so we'll get back my talk to reclamation. But we will, we will, of course, get you the list. Yeah, naturally. And then, and what can we expect to encourage us to start soliciting projects for, actually, for next year? Or is this just something that we do on a? Let me say that I will talk to Commissioner Burman, and I know it's an important issue for you. We will get back to you, but I will talk to Commissioner Burman. Thanks so much. And certainly in my district, we have three major conveyance facilities. We have the Frank Kerknau, the Delta and Dota Kinell, and the California aqueduct. And these are all law, a squatter carrying capacity because of the sides. And we're glad to see the departments made some, and this is a priority to addressing these issues. But can you talk more about the resources and here's making, they're proposing to make available for conveyance and the fixing of these facilities? With respect to the subsidence issue and the conveyance of water, I know that there's a couple of options being looked at. Again, I would defer to Commissioner Burman. The question is, do you use the same path or not? I don't have the data on that, but I understand it's critically important and we will get that information to you. Yeah, we're trying to work hand in hand with the department. You may know that I've introduced HR 5316 in the Move Water Now Act, which is specifically, which is targeted towards these conveyance facilities, particularly via Frank Kern Canal. And Carson and Carson, I have another bill to address the Delta, Mendoza Canal and the California aqueduct. Very, very important to what we need to be able to get water to where it's needed. Well, obviously the movement of water is critical and the conveyance structures and infrastructure is a critical and when you have a subsidence issue, which of course you're aware of, Frank Kern, we've trying to help with the state to try to figure out a way to make it work. Get it back operating. Yeah, thanks so much for that. We'll follow up on that. And on another subject, and I think my colleague, Mr. Nuguse from Colorado, made the point, is that there seems to be a bit of a scrapsi or dichotomy with regard to the Land and Water Conservation Fund. Is this something that is supported by the agency? Yes, in fact, in my opening comments, we stated that we did support it. Yeah, I beg your pardon, I was in the committee meeting. But it seems, and certainly the present the other day, tweeted out the any comments of work of a couple of senators who were attacking the conservation fund for years to come. But in this budget, he's basically proposing to more or less eliminate it. Well, we support the administration's policy and we were given new direction yesterday. Yeah. Well, the policy is reflected in the hard numbers, which is basically zero. All right, it's not zero, but it's a fraction of what has been funded in the past. Well, the president made clear his new direction yesterday and we are supporting that direction. All right, well, let's hope it doesn't change again. On an entirely different subject, it's very concerning that in here removed the terms gender and sexual orientation from its 2017 ethics guide in preventing workplace discrimination against employees and replace them with just a single term sex. Since the department and in here was under no legal obligation to make this change, why did the department remove sexual orientation and gender from its listed protected status? Well, I don't have the information about that. I will tell you that Secretary Bernhardt has made it unequivocally clear that he is very supportive of diversity of all types in the department, which is why he authorized me to set up the workplace culture or diversity and council and we worked very, very hard on that and we were having a online training in about June by a vendor for all 65,000 employees on all of the issues you raised, whether it is gender, race, whatever, it is gonna be covered in every person in the department will be required to take the training. We are very supportive of the appropriate positive inclusive culture at the department. Thanks so much, it goes on matter of time. I appreciate you being here.