Alrighty, so as promised on our previous YouTube videos and our Instagram account, we are going to present a counter argument. So everyone knows we are a speculation and rumors channel, and we want to counter some of our speculation and rumors sometimes to allow for both sides of the argument or speculation to have us say. So in today's video, we are going to discuss why Ziz or Bold Rush won't be a gigacoster. So as you know in a lot of our videos, we've discussed the possibilities of this being a gigacoster, but we have expressed that we strongly don't feel like this will be the case. And in today's video, we are definitely going to discuss the reasons why. There are definitely a lot of great reasons as to why this won't be a gigacoster, and we're going to discuss it. This is not a video saying it isn't going to be a gigacoster, and this isn't a video saying it's going to be a gigacoster. We are just going to present the other side's arguments as we've received over Instagram, and I want them to have us say in our videos as well. So I want to be know that I've discussed the length of the lift hill being a possibility for a gigacoster. Well, let's look at that a little further. So when comparing that to Leviathan, Leviathan is roughly 120 meters long at a 37 degree angle. That is why it's quite long. It's only a 37 degree angle. But one could suggest that we don't fully know the angle of our lift hill. We do believe the angle of the lift hill is 45 degrees. We've seen it in a couple of locations that would suggest that. And our lift hill length is approximately, let's say, 80 meters to 90 meters max. So one would assume if it's an angle of 35 degrees between 35 and 45 degrees, that this may not be a gigacoster after all, and bring its height down into around the range of 250 feet. Just to throw in a little extra knowledge, there became it is roughly 90 meters long of a lift hill at a 37 degree angle. And that brings it to 230 feet tall. We could be looking at around that height range for our new dive coaster. That's just a little diving into the length of the lift hill argument a little further. It doesn't prove anything. It doesn't disprove anything. But let's go into a few of the other wild theories I've thrown out there. So the ascent of the lift hill. We kind of just discussed that. We don't fully know the ascent of this lift hill. We used a program called CAD to figure out the ascent of the lift hill. And we saw some other things that would suggest it's 45 degrees. And for this kind of an argument, I personally do think it's 45 degrees, which would bring it still higher than Bowraven. But does not make it a giga automatically. So the ascent of the lift hill. Fully relies on the length of the lift hill. And the length of the lift hill is pure speculation at this moment. We do have a rough idea of it's like length that we've seen. But we don't have the full accounts of where the straight parts are on the lift. So it could end up being 80 meters long, which would bring it down to about Bowraven's kind of territory. Regardless, this coaster is definitely going to have a larger drop than Bowraven. That I can almost guarantee. I don't want a fully guarantee because I don't want to mislead any of you. But let's go to the pull out of the drop. This is an argument I've been using since the beginning. So the pull out of the drop is definitely around the size of Leviathan. And at first I was using this as like kind of like backing to the speculation and rumors of this being a gigacoster. And it's a fair assumption in most cases. But one could also argue that the length of our pull out is only that long for specific reasons like to get to its next element over vortex, vortexes in the way. So maybe it needs the extra long pull out to give it extra time to crest over the Imelon loop and back over vortex into another element. That could be a factor as well. That also brings me into the bolts on the track. So this is one argument that I used and in fact I did provide the wrong information. A couple of readers sent us in pictures of Bowraven at other parts of the coaster where it did in fact have 10x9 and 10x10. It all depends on the stress on the track at that moment. So I appreciate you guys sending me pictures and advice and opinions along the way. I will definitely correct it when I can. So again, just because our coaster has more bolts at the bottom of the drop, it could just mean there's a little more stress in there or it could be in fact because it's also underground. So that doesn't necessarily guarantee a giga or larger than Bowraven in that aspect as well. So we're going to go into the number of columns. Now this is an argument I can't really or I don't have much to say on. I don't have a counter argument for this. So we do know that our coaster has more columns than Bowraven. That I can guarantee that I know for sure. It actually has quite a few more columns and support sorry support columns than that to Bowraven. It also has a lot more footings as well. Now one would assume that automatically means it's larger than Bowraven by a lot and it would need a lot of extra speed to get through the layout. Well, that's not necessarily true. It could be the same height as Bowraven but not have a mid course break run which reduces its speed by a lot like other dive coasters and it would simply just make it through a longer layout by maintaining its speed that it gained from the drop and other elements along the ride. So this doesn't fully guarantee a larger coaster than that to Bowraven. Now I'm going to talk about a few other concepts. So those were the most popular theories I used to discuss the giga rumor. And again, I'm using this platform to give everyone a say. I want this channel to be not just a rumors and speculation channel. I want everyone to have like their opinions and speculation heard as well. I really want this channel to not just be me saying this is going to be a giga coaster. Everyone believe it. No, no, never. Definitely feel free to comment in my videos down below. Send me a message on Instagram if you disagree with me on anything and participate in control my videos on Instagram. I want to hear every side of the argument. That is not the kind of channel I'm going to be just dictating what I think something's going to be and forcing you guys to either agree with it or like feel like you're excluded from an opinion. I want your opinions in all of my videos as well. So let's get to Bowraven. Now this is a great argument in fact and this counters a lot to what I have to say and it actually leads into the next point as well. But Valraven is at Cedar Point. Valraven holds the records right now for a dive coaster and a lot of people would argue that why would you just take away Valraven's records so soon after it just being built? Valraven's still a newer coaster for Cedar Fair and Cedar Point and why would you give the records to a place that Canada's Wonderland that has its own records to be within its own country? There really isn't much purpose or need to take away from a major park in the US to give it to a less major park on the North American scale despite of how well it performs. The park doesn't necessarily need a record breaking coaster to do well. So one would argue that Cedar Fair doesn't really have that extra push or umph, we'll say, to give Canada's Wonderland a record breaking coaster. And if they were, why would they need to go from 223 feet to 300 feet? That's a big jump. So one could argue that there really isn't a need to burst that gigabubble so soon on the dive coasters and maybe leave that up for a park down the road. The carolans will end up taking that record down the road like 5 to 7 years from now if they would ever get a dive coaster or another park as well at King's Island or any other park in the Cedar Fair chain. Now that brings us to Wonderland and Canada. Wonderland is located in Canada and beating records in its own country is very easy to do. Thus, pleasing the public and creating that awe effect with the general public is easier to do than not in the States. So building a dive coaster with the gigabubble is it really something again that the park needs to do to wow the crowds? Canada again, as I just said, is easy to beat with records and Wonderland doesn't really hold any record breaking attractions on the global scale. So one could suggest that Cedar Fair has never been looking at beating records in Canada on the world scale and more so going after the records in Canada instead of again the world scale. Now, let's get to the theming and the expansion. So we know with this coaster we're probably looking at a massive expansion and maybe I slightly overexaggerated that actually it doesn't look so massive but it's getting an expansion. It looks like a whole themed area and theming for this ride. We see it right there. There's a lot of weird things happening with this coaster and one would assume if they're already spending a ton of money on theming and an expansion like the Canadian theme, we don't have that extra funds or the need again to build a gigabive coaster. Building something like Val Raven with suffice with this park and they don't have that extra again push to do something so massive when they're already providing a newer refreshed area, providing theming and guest experiences in the park at this new area and coaster. So why go the extra mile? Again, I really hope you guys enjoyed this video. Comment down below what you think. Are you on Team Giga or are you in the middle or are you just this is going to be smaller than Val Raven? I want to hear from you guys down below. Give the video like share this video for others to give their opinions. Anyways again, thanks so much for watching my videos guys and head on over to Instagram to participate in control my video. Have a good one guys. Bye.