We're saying that it's better for there to be a 50-50 custody, right? Maybe the female just looking at the other sides, back against the wall and going, gosh, if I don't keep my children more, which I'm used to doing, because I've been to stay at home, mom, and I don't have any career basis, I go out there and I work, I'm not going to be able to afford this apartment or whatever for my children. If I don't make the split difference so that he can pay me more so that I can have the amount of income to survive. Child support has nothing to do with your ability to earn. Child support has to do with. No, I didn't do anything to it. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. I'm saying that the female didn't have ability to earn possibly. She's making an error judgment, but with a financial need to go after this, her ex, for more custody, possibly, because she thinks, and she's right, she doesn't have the capacity to go make the living on her own. So basically, your saying is that there's a mother who doesn't have the ability to make a decision on the best result of her children, because she's putting money. No, no, no, exactly what you're saying. No, no, you're twisting my words.