Well, earlier I spoke to the Culture Secretary Nadine Doris, and I've again by asking her what Boris Johnson was apologising for. I think he was apologising to everybody who feels that the culture in No. 10 did not represent the restrictions that people had to adhere to out in the country. Is he sorry for his own behaviour? Is he sorry for that? His own behaviour. So, look, Sugre has produced a report, and in that report, she says no conclusions should be drawn. What has happened is that some of those issues, and you will have the list, have been referred to some of these parties. You know, when I'm not apologising for his own behaviour... ...teas, but... Or is he apologising for other people's behaviour? I think he's apologising for the position that we're in at the moment. Was his allegation that Kierstarma was responsible for not prosecuting Jimmy Savile? How can you have a Prime Minister just repeating fake news like that? Well, I have no idea the backgrounds of Kierstarma, and I know that he... It's not true, and the Prime Minister repeated it. It's an old meme that's just repeated by... We know there were things that Kierstarma said that someone who's the former Director of Public Prosecutions shouldn't have said at the dispatch box. He shouldn't have pre-judged what a met investigation is going to happen. He shouldn't have said anything that was untrue. Well, I... Of course, Johnson said something that was untrue. He said things that were inappropriate. I don't believe that's the case. Well, it is what you're saying that Kierstarma was responsible for not prosecuting. I don't know. I don't know. Well, that's what the Prime Minister said. You haven't heard your word, right? Well, I think there are lots of things that Kierstarma shouldn't have said. Well, there are clearly things that he said that aren't true. A Prime Minister? Whether they were deliberate lies or not has yet to be established, but he's clearly said things to the House that were not true. The Prime Minister tells the truth. The mess have revealed that they've got 300 images relating to these parties. Does that worry you? No, not at all. I think the more information that they have, the better their investigation will be. And what about the parties in the flat, or the gatherings in the flats that are being investigated? I don't know. Anything of any gatherings, so I can't really comment. Don't you think it's all that the Prime Minister wouldn't confer whether he was at one of the gatherings being investigated by the police? Well, as I've said numerous times, no one can say anything while an ongoing investigation, because it could be prejudiced. No, I mean, the same whether you were in your flat or not does not prejudice me quite. No, it's... My friend, the Prime Minister, is bound by the same constraints that we all are, until and that investigation is concluded, we can't say anything. I mean, the truth is you would support no matter what, wouldn't you? That's... I mean, there are no circumstances under which you would say enough. Do you want to ask me a serious question? Well, I'll have it. I mean, what would it take?