So these are two Japanese style handcubals made by Sarmat. Here's one of them that I didn't touch. This one I modified, I added hemp wrapping on them. So here's the original one and that one is modified. So you can ignore that one. That one's for myself. This one I'm planning to sell. This bow is 88 pounds at 32 inches or 76 pounds at 28 inches. These are 71 inch length handcubes. A full length Japanese killer, you may as over 2 meters. It really depends on the height of the person, but usually around 2.2 meters. These are only 1.8 meters which is basically my height. So they're shorter, but they're not exactly half the length of a Kildo UB. A 2.2 divided by 2 is 1.1. These are not 1.1 meters. So these are more like 75% Japanese bows. And I actually really like this length because I'm inside and I cannot shoot a 2.2 meter long full size Kildo bow. You see, most people when they practice modern Kildo, they're not shooting historical weights. They're doing about, it really depends on the skill level, but anywhere from 15 pounds to maybe 50 pounds, that's the kind of draw weight of modern Kildo. And that makes sense because the purpose is not to go to war. You don't need to. And just like modern target archery, you don't need that much draw weight in. I get that. But I wanted something more closer to the historical weights of military Japanese bows. What I find is heavy draw weight Japanese bows are very expensive and rare. Anything near the 100 pound mark or above that. Very few people make them. Of course, being not a full size UMI, you cannot pull it to Japanese drawlings, at least for Kildo. So what are hand cues? Well, historically, it seems that hand cues were not used in battle. According to the Japanese literature, it seems like most of the mentions of hand cue are for foreign bows. Like the Mongols, the Chinese or the Koreans, they would call them hand cues. But they almost never called Japanese bows for war hand cues. That being said, these are not exactly half the length of the Japanese bow. It is possible that the Japanese made bows this short for a very short person or sometimes just because they feel like making a shorter than the usual one. That is possible. So I did some calculations based on Japanese artwork. And as you can see, based on the historical heights of people back in the day, and then using that artwork, if we assume that artwork accurately represents the length of the bows, which, by the way, is the artistic representation, then these lens are approximately 2 meters or 1.9 meters long based on the average of all these artwork. But like I said, this is artistic representation. This is not archaeological evidence. I would love to read more about the historical lens of Fudo Japanese bows. Like this one, I wrapped it with hemp because hemp, in my opinion, is stronger than written for tensile strength. So I wrapped it all along just to reinforce it more. And I've seen Japanese war bows wrapped all the way along. Now, 87 and 32. Sitting down, it's hard to pull this thing. I'm going to have to stand up to shoot it. Two pieces of bamboo sandwiched with ash core. Wow, that is awesome. I just feel that almost 90 pounds. Okay, let's try. So here you go, and thank you, both Japanese style. Time goes away. to haveå of