Many discussed in these articles will be angered by them. I am not writing for public acclaim nor to participate in a LARP drama. I am writing for history. I fully expect everyone named in these articles to despise me and to attack me publicly. It comes with the territory. I am not trying to antagonize anyone. I am trying to write what truths I uncover and to present them as dispassionately as I can. That means that some of the genders will find them under mind or challenged. This is not personal. One problem is that I am now a protagonist in these matters, which is not wherein historian is supposed to be. As much as I can, I attempt to extricate myself and to discuss these affairs minimizing my own personal bias. But objectivity, I think, is impossible. I try to be transparent about my own agenda and my own preferences, and honest about my own biases. I think that anyone that claims that they are objective as either fooling themselves or lying. Whenever someone claims to be objective, we should consider that a warning signal, an indicator of propaganda. Honest analysts admit that their views are partisan and explain why they feel as they do. I would ask that those who are annoyed by my work to try to take a longer view. Try to consider these matters from the viewpoint of future historians. It is for them that I am writing. Thanks for reading. I appreciate comments and corrections. Thanks to Bontrohio Nicodiaris.