So, evolution happening now? Yes, yes. As we've talked, one of the interesting things is that evolution happens continuously for everything. As the environment changes, we keep evolving, moving forward. If you believe that we can see everything is evolving, then everything is in this space that we're evolving. Then the space itself must, almost necessarily, be evolving. Sounds awfully complicated and difficult to live through. What's all about adaptive modification? That's not what I've worked or done in the manual. I ordered, you know, okay, I grew up in 21 years old now. I'm done, and then I live, and then I die. I die. Well, I sleep that last part off. So you're saying it's like the good news is it's a continually adjusting, self-adjusting manifold that's unfolding. And the bad news is it's a continually adjusting manifold. Well, you're talking about the 21, the 21 year old. I mean, I've got a blog post on, it's a good research on this. Why were crazy from 11 to 30? And they actually do lag, you know, basically 10 years difference to give this time to settle in. The idea was, you go through this period of being unsettled, of all those teenagers, and you're evolving. The only species that has this enormously long period of maturation, but it enables us the ability to adapt to a new environment. So we spend the 11 to 20 something, early 20 something, adapting to our environment, whatever I think it is. Well, the thing is that used to work, like we're all going to be always going to live in Trenton, New Jersey, and you find out you leave Trenton, and you go to some Dubuque Iowa, and you're finding you're a whole different ecosystem. So you've adapted to this ecosystem when you're in Trenton, and now you've got a whole other world. It's enabled us to, you know, colonize the planet. We can live any place. But you can't, if you stay there, you're okay, but you start moving around, then you've got to re-adapt. So adaptation, okay, so I'm going on and on. And even if you stay in Trenton, Trenton changes. Yes, Trenton changes. So I mean, I find that that can help just a little bit that, you know, particularly as we have entered this period of such extraordinarily rapid change, and it seems weird, that, just to know, don't take it personally, it's not you. That yes, this is what it's like to be part of a self-aware, dynamically unfolding system that evolves, is that you're never done. It's a continual learning process, and the more you can surrender to the fact that it's a continual learning process, the more joyful and adventurous that learning process is, and the less you'll try to dig in your heels and say, well, no, I just want to hold on to my piece of this rock right here, and then you suffer when the rock morphs into the buke. That's right. Well, this is the whole operating system that we've talked about before. We established a system, so about 1,000 years ago, and now it's gotten to where we need to evolve something better, because clearly, even in the last five years, life has changed for most functioning people in the world. And you can't run on the same system you're running on the floor, so we have to evolve. We have to keep evolving, and we're going to be dysfunctional. It was a big thing, and we probably saw this, recently where Go, which is supposedly what the most complicated game in the world, and one that cannot be solved just by number crunching, requires intuitive insights. But now, this deep thinking group at Google has beaten four out of five times that one of the worlds Go Jam. They've been cheated. They used to machine, they cheated. But no, exactly. The thing about this thing, I wrote a blog post on this particular guy, the guy who runs the Google program, is supposed to be extraordinary in life, exceptionally. And he already had developed this deep learning system, could learn adaptively. He didn't number crunch, but it learns how people will respond and how people solve problems. There's enough time to learn how to do that game. And now it's gotten even smarter. It's played against the one of the best Go players in the world, it's beaten in four out of five times. And he's learned. The machine has now learned even smarter, because it's learned out of that process. And one of the differences, then, see, one of the reasons it's learned is because it's rewriting itself. It is. See, and one of the big distinctions we might see between, say, the operating system that we've been working with since the emergence of the I, say, 70,000 years ago, and this operating system that we're pointing to now is that this new operating system has to be involved in a constant rewrite of itself. It's not done once and for all. Now, MSDOS, I'm just running, here's the word processor. No, the essence of the new operating system is that it's involved in self-alteration. And that's a completely different experience of the world, because it takes, as it's premise, that the world is this dynamic, self-aware unfolding phenomenon, as opposed to, here's my piece of the world. I have figured out this part within my piece of the world, and I'm going to hold on for dear life. MSDOS, now, too under the obvious fact that we all have access to enormous information. We don't process it the same way we used to, because we can go offline and grab it. So we're going to be all assessed to deal with that, a processor to deal with that situation. So deal with the offline analysis thing. Yeah. It's going to be different. It's going to have to be different. So where we're at right now is that we still have this operating system that acts like it's like, I'm Gary. I'm born. I'm Gary. Gary, Gary's. And then Gary's good at something. That good at some of the things that he's done. Whereas what we're talking about is something that actually undermines even the notion of a stable name, exactly, for a period of one's life. Because one is not one any essential identity over the form of a period of one's life. And in fact, as soon as we fall for the idea that we're any essential form of identity, we begin to suffer. Which is really very interesting in the context of, say, contemporary notions of identity. Because now the idea is that we're suddenly recognizing that there are all these different forms of identity, which of course there always have been. But we need to perhaps take the next step to not only recognize it there are these forms of identity, but that these are provisional, itself, undermining and not essential to who we are. Well, and then, in rich and gary, are ad hoc entities. There is no richer, gary sitting inside here running things. It's just an energy way of sweeping across the brain as an ad hoc basis changing and changing and changing. There is no fixed entity. And once you realize that, your investment in being discreet changes completely. And it feels terrible to be discreet, in fact. Because you feel local, if you're literally at the crosshairs of the cosmos. Whereas if you can feel that, oh, I'm a wave form across my brain, and that means I'm continually involved in this rewiring of myself. That's a dynamic, adventurous phenomenon to be. It's not a thing. Exactly. That's if we've been laboring them as an idea or metaphor that we were a thing when we're not. A frozen thing. Yeah. And you're not. You're a dynamic, constantly changing, constantly evolving with them. And that feels better. That feels weaker.