Yeah, hello. This is Chris Puzzby again. I got such a good response from my Facebook post on the issue of the Russian poisoning of the Scripiles. I thought I'd say something on YouTube as well about it so that I could reach more people because it's quite an important issue for various reasons that I'll explain. The first thing I need to say about all of this is that I am an expert in this area. If I'm an expert in any area, this is the area I'm expert in. I worked for several years at the Welcome Research Laboratories in Beckenham on the physical chemistry of pharmaceutical compounds or small organic compounds. And my job there apart from the research aspect, which was to do with how these things work at the molecular level, was to develop and use spectroscopic and other methods to determine the structure of these substances as they were made by the chemists who synthesize these molecules for testing. So I spent a long time figuring out what the molecular structure of these things were, which means I know how it's done. Also, I did my first PhD at Green Mary College London on a similar project involving synthesizing small organic molecules in order to investigate their properties, their acidity constants and stuff like that. So that's where I'm coming from here. I do happen to know about this stuff. So what I can say is that the, first of all, that the substance, the A234 substance, which port and down tell us they've identified as being the material that poisoned the scriptiles, that is not something that you would need to have a state actor to make. I mean, this is just a basic organic chemical synthesis. The only difficulty about it would be it's extraordinary toxicity. So you'd need to have a good fume-cubbered system and protective equipment so as to not to get it on yourself and kill yourself or one of your technicians, but it's not particularly difficult to make. Any synthetic organic chemists would be able to knock up something like that without a lot of difficulty. So that's the first thing. So it doesn't have to have been made in a fancy laboratory. But the second and more important thing is that the way in which you investigate the structure, you identify the material, is you take a sample and in this case, probably it wouldn't be an awful lot of it, but nowadays they're all sorts of very sophisticated machines. And what you would do is you would then examine it using gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. It's the mass spectrometry that would give you the molecular ion and the molecular ion fragments as this material disintegrated inside the various methods that they have for breaking molecules up into little bits and then shooting them down a mass spectrometer to measure the actual ion fragment masses. And that spectrum, the spectrum of the mass spectrometer results would identify the material. But in order to do that, you'd have to have an example of a material, it had to synthesize the material in order to have a pattern that showed you whether what it was you were looking at was the same thing. So you would have a lot of bands in the mass spectrum and you'd look for the same bands. It's effectively a spectrometry issue. But the important thing is you have to have a sample to start off with in order to find this particular material. Now we used to do a lot of work on this in order to find drugs that had been synthesized in India or in Spain or in various countries, which were the same as the drugs that that welcomed them and patented. And the idea was that you could show that those drugs had been synthesized in a particular laboratory or in a particular country because you would have samples of those that would enable you to find impurities. So it's the impurities fragments inside the spectrum of the material that enable you to identify its source. Now there is no way, as far as I can tell, or certainly that haven't told us, in which port and down in the country could have obtained material from Russia, which they could have compared to the material that was found in the Skrip El's house or on the car or wherever it was they found it. And we hear lots of different stories about where it came, where it was fact, where it was detected. So the first thing that we have to say is that if they're saying that they know where it came from in Russia, they're lying because they can't know that. They would not be able to know that unless they had a sample of the material from Russia that they could compare it to. And how could they get such a thing? And today in the times, or I see another, you know, now that this is now that the port and down has said that they can't identify the material that's having come from Russia. Of course, there's a lot of egg on face all over the place, so Boris Johnson and that stupid woman Theresa May. And then I'm saying that they have this evidence, which they have to keep secret, of course, that it came from some facility in Russia. But then the question is, how on earth did they get a sample from that facility in Russia? It's just not possible. It's not possible. So they're lying, as usual. They're just trying to cover that back because they're looking stupid and they're increasingly looking increasingly stupid. The only thing we do know about is that this material, the exact same material, was synthesized in the United States, chemical warfare, depot or site, in the United States. And somebody put the fragmentation pattern on the sides of it, NIST, National Institute of Science and Technology website, although they've since taken it off. So we certainly know that the American synthesizer, I know it's probably quite reasonable to suppose that port and down synthesize it as well. If you wanted to know my opinion, I believe that this is either material from port and down, or it's material from the United States. And this was a false flag operation along along the lines of the same sorts of false flag operations that led to the Iraq war. And the Iraq war you remember was what because of the idea of weapons of mass destruction that Salam Hussein had, but of course he didn't have any of the sort. So that was also bogus. And the real reason for the attack of Iraq, which we don't need to go into too much here, but it's about, it was because Salam Hussein had decided to stop paying for his, stop asking for dollars for the oil and to sell it in euros. And when Qaddafi decided to do the same thing and set up an Arabic denar based on gold, he was taken out as well. And then the Syrians decided that they were going to sell oil, not in dollars, but in euros. And of course, they were invaded too. So what this is all about is the end of the United States empire, the petro dollar empire. Basically that's it. The Russians have now built the pipelines to China, and they're going to start trading their oil directly with China on the basis of UN. And China is becoming one of the largest importers of oil now because of its huge expansion. And so they're going to ask the Saudis to start paying in UN and not in dollars. And so basically the dollar control of trade is going down, the toilet rapidly. So of course something has to be done, and what's being done is a war is being engendered. And this is terrifying because the fact is that, and this is where my other expertise comes in, that nobody can win such a war if they have even a limited nuclear exchange, if the materials, if the radioactive materials fall all over the place, then that's the end of it. This is because the risk model that they have, which tells them the stupid people to reason-man Boris Johnson and all those stupid fools, possibly Trump as well, the risk model, the radiation risk model that tells those people that they can survive a nuclear war is wrong by factors of up to 10,000 times. And we've already seen the effects of just the nuclear weapons testing. I mean I see increases in cancer in people who were the children who were born to the children who were born at the time of the nuclear testing. And very recently I saw another piece of evidence relating to this that in fact young men are more likely to farther down syndrome, children than old men like me. So the rate that if I were to marry a 30-year-old girl and have a baby, the probability of it being a down syndrome baby is five times less than if I was age 20. Yes? Okay, imagine that. Anyway that's enough, enough horror show, but just to make it perfectly clear, and that's why I'm putting this video up, that there's no way in which there's any proof that that material that poisoned the screwpiles came from Russia. That's the take-home message. Okay, thank you for listening. Talk to you again.