This nice article about you, the man who would unseat Nancy Pelosi, and in there there's this picture, not that one, here you go, a few a decade ago, this you with an also younger looking Robert Mueller, what, why, what do you do with hanging out, what was this all about? So at the time I was running a program, I was launching a program against racial and religious profiling on behalf of the nonprofit startup called Muslim Advocates. Bob Mueller was the head of the FBI, and I would describe him as art to some extent principal nemesis. Bob Mueller was at the time overseeing what I described as co-intelpro2.0, and this is the FBI's program of infiltrating a Quaker organizations, Muslim organizations, peace activists, and we'll write activists. The continuation of the government's use of human intelligence to subvert and neutralize domestic dissent is one of the things that ultimately got me both into this race and also deeper into my own advocacy. In 2008 I was had the opportunity to advise President Obama's transition team on civil rights issues, and we gave them a whole bunch of recommendations that they subsequently ignored, and then I spent the next few years going at the FBI, organizing coalitions of civil rights organizations. We successfully, one of the letters I wrote had dozens of civil rights organizations that signed on to it this year in 2010, and we prompted a question from Senator Leahy at an oversight hearing in the Senate asking the FBI leadership how they legally justified their program, and the response, frankly, was fascinating and never got the follow-up that it deserved, but it is precisely the failure of Congress to answer important questions that is driving me to run, because the last time I had a chance to ask any questions of an executive official, they arrested me for it, with the seat in Congress, they actually have to answer your questions, and I'm very eager to get some answers to my questions. I would like to think so too, but I've watched some of these things. Don't seem to get questions answered even then. I mean, honestly, it seems like it's going to take more than a constitutional lawyer. We need 535 of them. You know what I mean? There's a lot to go in there. There seems to be a very systemic issue with all of Congress not seeming to really feel like it needs to be held accountable to anybody. I certainly agree with your point about accountability, but just to press the case about the, because I hear the, I don't want to say futility, but the resignation perhaps in that view. And certainly right that we need the entire chamber for legislation. But when we talk about answering questions, I'm talking ultimately there about oversight, and oversight doesn't take 530 members. We've seen Ilhan Omar use oversight like in art. I haven't seen a member of Congress prove that skilled in leveraging the oversight context to challenge official narratives and spark viral conversations about deep-seated issues in our body politic that we haven't had debates about in generations. No one's done that, I think, since I don't even think Russ Feingold, who were called most of them, did that in the same way that that a freshman member of Congress, Ref. U.G. for Minnesota, is tearing it up. And that's the kind of frankly leadership that I hope to emulate and learn from and extend and empower, you know, at the end of the day, we need that kind of voice represented, at least on all the committees. And I hope to diversify the set of branches in Congress and the committees, particularly in which that critical long overdue and long-habson voice is represented.