Sir, you've spoken against welfare creating a culture of dependency on poor people. Doesn't it amount to welfare when Wall Street gets bailouts when the federal reserve does preferential economic policies towards the big banks, mining companies get handouts, broadcasters get free airwaves? Does it mean it's time to get big business off of welfare as well? It's time to get everybody off of welfare and the only way you're going to do that is to totally eliminate the tax code and replace it with the fair tax which is a national consumption tax. Look, as long as we have the current tax code, politicians and administrations will always have the discretion to pick winners and losers whether they are picking it for Wall Street, whether they're picking it for corporations. And so the only way to solve the problem isn't to just say we're going to get rid of all of it unless we get rid of the entire tax code. That's the ultimate solution. Are you forgetting rid of too big to fail type things? Yes, I am against the too big to fail philosophy. The way you sort out winners and losers is not by the government making that decision. You let the marketplace make that decision. That's why we have bankruptcy laws. But the bigger problem is eliminating the tax code, replacing it such that we don't have the opportunity for a lot of those kinds of programs to be inserted into the economic process. But weren't you for the bailouts, what you know Goldman Sachs and AIG and all of them were working on that? No, let's clarify. I hope you run this clip over and over and over and over. I was for the concept of tarp because of the financial meltdown we were looking at because I stood at the financial meltdown which was drastic and we needed to do something drastic. Where I parted ways with tarp was when the administration started to pick and choose winners and come up with these concepts like too big to fail. I didn't agree with that. I think that the administration of the tarp funds was too discretionary. And even on top of that, they tried to get some banks to take money that they didn't want. That wasn't how I expected the administration to utilize those funds. That's when I parted ways with the whole concept. I explained something like Jesus is teaching that it's easier for the rich man to pass through the eye of a needle with your own philosophy. I believe in a philosophy of help those that help themselves. There are patterns to the others who can't for some reason. Help those that help themselves. And if people can help themselves and they don't want to help themselves, well yes, there will always be some compassionate people out there and some compassionate ways to help them. But the problem with a lot of part, but that's not you. Oh, no, it is me. If you were familiar with my giving and my compassion, I help people who help themselves. One of the fundamental things that I want to change is President of the United States is we've got to get away from this entitlement society to an empowerment society. And if people aren't willing to help themselves. Now, the good news is more people are willing to help themselves. But I happen to believe that a lot of the programs encourage people to stay on government programs rather than encouraging people to get off of government programs. That's what I mean by restructuring these programs and convert it to an empowerment society.