Well, the views Joy Behar used her time with the vice president of the United States today to go after the panelists at the Fox News Google debate last week, including yours truly. Ms. Behar purported to be a guest at how none of the panel chastised the audience for some booing in response to a gay soldier's question. What did you think of the booing that went on the other day about the gay soldier? Did you have a high-end? Did you have a high-end? Did you have a head of the response to it? I did have a vissile response. I'm not sure it's because my son spent a year in Iraq, and I know my son and all the kids with him, kids to grown men. I don't think they give a damn whether a guy find a rifle to protect them as gay or straight. I don't think they care about that. And look, this kid risks his life. This kid is there for a year. And I quite frankly, I thought it was reprehensible. Right. And no one spoke up. That entire panel, not one person said anything. Well, having actually been at the debate, I can tell you that there were perhaps a total of two booze in an auditorium of over 5,000 people. Moreover, were the booze, in fact, directed as Ms. Behar contends at the gay soldier or at his question on the issue of gay rights in the military, which is very controversial. Listen for yourselves. Do they boo when they see that it is a gay soldier or when he makes clear he wants gay rights protected? In 2010 when I was deployed to Iraq, I had to lie about who I was because I'm a gay soldier. And I didn't want to lose my job. My question is, under one of your Presidencies, do you intend to circumvent the progress that's been made for a gay and lesbian soldier in the military? Yeah, I would say. Well those attending these debates are entitled to their point of view. And in this anchor's view, it is not the panelist role to correct those views or chastise them who hold them. If an audience is disruptive, that's one thing. But this audience was respectful with virtually no exceptions. To have suggested otherwise might have pleased some GOP critics, but would not have been consistent with the facts.