The difference is we don't engage in the politics of personal destruction. The fact is that if we just talk about the issues, for example, I think it would be interesting to people in these districts to know that the speaker wants to take away the guarantee of Medicare. So I think talking about issues is where we should be. What is the difference in one person being speaker than another? It's a self-fulfilling problem. You demonize and then you, we call it the wrap-up sneer. You want to talk politics. You call it the wrap-up sneer. You smear somebody with falsehoods and all the rest and then you merchandise it. And then you write it and as they see it's reported in the press that this, this, this, and this, so they have that validation that the press reported the smear and then it's called the wrap-up sneer. Now I'm going to merchandise the press's report on the smear that we made. It's it's it's attacked. And it's it's self-evident. But I think I'm worth the trouble, Fed frankly. I love the fray. I'm not, you know, I'm not disrespectful of people's views. I respect any positive things that people want to say or even negative as long as it's constructive.