Hello beta testers. Five people are lost at sea. Presumed dead after boarding an experimental and untested submarine. Their intention was to go explore the Titanic. The CEO, Stockton Rush, when crafting his team said he specifically avoided the expertise of 50-year-old white guys. Opting instead for a younger, diverse team that would inspire in his words. There are other sub operators out there, but they typically have gentlemen who are ex-military sub-mariners and they will see a whole bunch of 50-year-old white guys. I wanted our team to be younger, to be inspirational, and I'm not going to inspire a 16-year-old to go pursue marine technology. A 25-year-old who's a sub-pilot or a platform operator or one of our techs can be inspirational. We've really tried to get very intelligent, motivated, younger individuals involved because we're doing things that are completely new. That CEO, Stockton Rush, after having committed a bunch of people to a watery grave, implying that the new things that they are doing, the completely new things, are not testing equipment and then dying as an immediate result of untested equipment that believe it or not, contrary to popular belief, that is not completely new. That's pretty popular. Black man, Kyle here, and if you've followed this channel for long enough, you know that I take issue with people prioritizing diversity and age or whatever discriminatory garbage over skill, expertise, or talent. So five people climb aboard the sketchy sub-marine with four people having signed a death waiver. An experimental submersible vessel that has not been approved or certified by any regulatory body and could result in physical injury, disability, emotional trauma, or death. Where do I sign? Five billionaires climb into a tomb that can only be opened from the outside. Oceangate avoided having any of their subs professionally inspected, claiming that it would have been a powerful, powerful, powerful, powerful, powerful, powerful, powerful, powerful and powerful. And now, people are dead. This is history now. You clowns jumped aboard a sketchy submarine to go see the Titanic. Soon we will go down to see the sketchy untested submarine, and hopefully bring it back to the surface to see what happened. What went wrong? In this sub, that can only be opened from the outside. My sub guy, I'm going to leave a link in the description. He says that the carbon fiber probably shattered. And that if anything went wrong, there was likely no way to vent the... I mean, a number of things could have gone wrong. First, the Titanic sinks. Then we sent down Titan. Now we have to send tit, all of us together in the world, in the discord, like a spirit bomb. One subscribe equals one hope for safer submarines. What you thought was going to say to you was going to save them. You do want people to be safe, don't you? Don't eat to me right now. And I'll try my best to hype billionaires into needing to be the one to go down there and retrieve this sunken story of this century. I guess Elon's too busy and broke. You knew, came here, get your way, stone. Let's see what went terribly wrong, you know what I mean? It's a totally preventable tragedy. But at least he was proud of that wireless controller. You know, it's so dumb that college graduate could use it, you know what I'm saying? Pretty crazy right? They should have used the Mad Cat's controller. You know what that is? It's a joke for gamers. I just wish we could stop fighting as a species. We're not supposed to not kick this. It's a tragedy. There was a loss of life. Sure, but this was explosively... Or maybe implosively? Is that okay? It was preventable. That's where I'm going with this. The Titan tragedy is a devastating event that has resulted in the loss of life during a deep sea expedition. What I would like to raise are my significant concerns pertaining to the decision making process going into CEO Stockton Russia's Ocean Gate Expeditions. In this video essay, we will delve into the repercussions of the CEO's deliberate choice to hire young, diverse college graduates over experienced individuals and how this decision may have played a role in this unfortunate outcome. Hiring young and diverse people over experts, dismissing experienced individuals such as veterans, submarineers. The CEO has failed to recognize the value of their expertise and their ability to mitigate risks. The absence of a knowledgeable presence from the submarine community within the team could have contributed to critical oversight and inadequate decision making during the decision and operation of the submarine. The CEO's emphasis on hiring young and experienced college graduates raises concerns about their ability to handle the complex challenges associated with deep sea expeditions. The experimental nature of the submarine's design further compounds the risks as the vessel was not approved or certified by any regulatory body with the CEO going as far as to say that the safety and caution was excessive. Inadequate experience combined with an untested and unsertified vessel creates a hazardous environment that can and did have dire consequences. The reliance on consumer grade wireless technology also raises questions about the reliability and safety of such systems, not an issue in itself inherently, but when you're only showing us a wireless controller, of course there's going to be questions raised about its reliability, potential loss of connection, battery power, failed Bluetooth connections, and what that may do to the lack of contingency plans and alternate control methods demonstrate a lack of foresight and proper risk management. The design of the submarine with a single hatch held in place by 17 bolts presents a grave concern for the safety of the crew, the absence of a secondary egress point or mechanism to open the hatch from the inside creates a life-threatening situation in the event of an emergency. By entrusting the crew's safety solely to the support team of the surface vessel, the CEO neglected a critical aspect of emergency preparedness, potentially contributing to the tragic loss of life. The claims of 96 hours of life support provided by Oceangate Expedition raises more questions about the testing and reliability of the system. You tested that, 96 hours? You tested that? Without thorough testing in a controlled environment such as simulating toxic gas levels or prolonged operation, the CEO's decision to rely on unverified figures jeopardizes the safety of the crew and, moreover, the absence of emergency air breathing systems and effective methods to mitigate toxic gas or smoke in the capsule highlights a severe oversight in ensuring survival of the crew in emergency situations. This tragedy regarding the Titan serves as a stark reminder of the critical importance of experience, expertise, and rigorous safety measures in high risk ventures like deep sea expeditions. The decision of Oceangate's CEO to prioritize youth and diversity. Over subject matter expertise has had devastating consequences by neglecting the lessons learned from established industries and failing to implement proven safety protocols, the CEO's choices have compromised the lives of the crew members. This tragedy should serve as a reminder that safety should come first. I hate to say it and to have it be real. But in this scenario, you get woke, you go dead. If you found this video informative, please like it, please leave a comment. This could be the beginning of a saga because I am so excited to read more about this. This is just a summary. Some people jumped on this sub that you're looking at with a young crew and wireless controllers. Whoa. I have a sub guy. Go listen to him. The link is in the description. Go listen to him. And then tell me what I should be reading next. Dia has sent me pages of links of people just a roast in.