How do you define jazz? In your own mind. Three elements of jazz that have to be present. One is improvisation, which is the I part. Freedom to express yourself. The second is swing, which is the opposite of the I. It's the us. A swing is a matter of coordination and balance. It teaches you diplomacy. Yes, you have freedom, but other people have freedom too. So how are you going to get that together? How is your freedom going to go from yours to ours? So as you revel in that improvisation, oh, I can play with an I. You play in two. Then the blues. The blues aesthetic is our spiritual overview, which is optimism in the face of adversity and an optimism that's not naive, which is that this is life. Bad things happen. That's a fact of being alive. There's no perfection. If you are out there, you're paying dues. And how do you deal with those dues? And how do you use what you have to be resilient? And to deepen your humanity through the tragedy and the struggles? And how can you express the depth of that humanity that is earned? And a way that will uplift people and give them a general, this is to exhibit a generosity of feeling and a generosity of spirit and a depth of feeling that we call soul that comes out of the blues aesthetic. And it's also very essential ingredient to our music. And when it's not present, even if you're a great improviser, even if you can swing, you're not in that line. Those all three of those things must be present. That's incredible. Yes sir. Jazz music is the perfect metaphor for democracy. We improvise, which is our individual rights and freedoms. We swing, which means we are responsible to nurture the common good, of everyone in fine balance, and we play the blues. Which means no matter how bad things get, we remain optimistic while still mindful of problems. I like to always think about the founders and all the geniuses and men of accomplishment. Think about them in terms of the first beboppers like Charlie Parker, Dizzy Gillespie, Thelonius Mug. They were working out fundamentals of an idea of a way to play that featured very, very quick thinking, adjustment, and ability to have a light framework and fill it with things of genius that also can be amended. And the same way that we work under the Constitution. Let's not forget that the federal Constitution has many, many fewer words than any state Constitution. So they framed a very flexible and strong document. This still serves us well if we choose to follow it. The question that confronts us right now is a nation. Is do we want to find a better way? And if we answer affirmative, we'll make it through these things. If we decide no, we want to be our worst selves, we're going to struggle.