This study explain the effect of temperatu re on the product yield of guinea -corn stalk (Char, tar and Gas). Approximately 0.23kg dried G uinea Corn Stalk (GCS) was introduced into the retort in which the retort was rendered airtight. The retort was placed into the chamber of an electric furnace and the GCS was pyrolysed at a temperature of 400OC at a constant time of 20minutes. This was repeated for tempera tures 450,500,550 and 600OC and in each cases, the quantities of char, tar and the bio -gas were determined. Proximate and ultimate analysis were carried out on the sample in other to know the level of moisture content in the sample and also to know if GCS has more contribution to global warming by observing the percentage of the Sulphur and Nitrogen content in the ultimate analysis. Using the sigma plot application as well as the Microsoft excel bar chart to illustrate the relationship between the temperatu re and the pyrolysis product. This application depict and shown how the increase in temperature affect the product yield (Gas, Tar and Char). The Char yields a percentage of approximately 17% at 400OC and drastically de creased to 27% at 600OC, the tar yields a percentage of approximately 28% at 400OC and increased to 39% at 600OC and also the gas yields a percentage of approximately 17% at 400OC and increased to 34% at 600OC. The result shown that GCS can be pyroly zed at and high temperature to obtaining more yields of bio-gas. Keywords: Pyrolysis, Guinea -corn stalk, Bio fuels, Gas, Tar, Char and proximate and ultimate analysis. 1.0 INTRODUCTION An increment in the numbers of the world industrialization and motorization has led to a steep rise for the demand of petroleum -based fuels. Today fossil fuels take up 80% of the primary energy consumed in the world, of which 58% alone is consumed by the t ransport sector (Nigam S.W, 2008 ). The high cost of this energy and it environmenta l impacts has placed enormous stresses on the developing world. The use of fossil fuels (non -renewable) is increasingly problematic from both an economic and environmental point of view. It has been necessary to identify compatible relief strategies to avo id the exhaustion of fossil fuels and minimize the excess of CO 2 emissions related to energy production (Ribeiro et al., 2007). As a result of the fast rising depletion of fossil fuel, different countries are working on an eco -friendly, alt ernative and renewable means of generating fuel which includes solar, wind, hydroelectricity, geothermal and energy from biomass (biofuel). Biomass is a promising eco -friendly alternative source of renewable energy in the context of current energy scenario s. It’s a fuel that derived directly or indirectly from biological materials (i.e. from living or dead organisms), they are the sources of all biofuels and plays an important role in diversifying the global sources of energy. Also it is recognized as a gre en and alternative renewable biofuel. It uses most especially agricultural residue products such as guinea corn stalk, maize stalk, rice husk and so -on to generate energy (Lam et al., 2010). Although biomass is complex in nature, biomass contains a small a mount of sulphur, nitrogen and ash. Therefore, combustion of bio -fuel produces less harmful gas emissions such as nitrogen oxides (NO x), sulphur dioxide (SO 2) and soot compared to conventional fossil fuels (Okekunle, et al., 2018) . In addition, zero or nega tive carbon dioxide (CO 2) emission is possible from biomass fuel combustion because released CO 2 from the combustion of bio -oil can be recycled into the plant by photosynthesis (Mohammad et al., 2010). In the conversion of biomass to bioenergy, several pro cesses can be used which include: chemical, biological and thermal processes. C hemical processes involve the trans -esterification of oil to produce biodiesel, Biological method involves the use of fermentation (bacterial, algae and fungal) while thermal conversion processes include direct combust ion, gasification and pyrolysis . Out of all these processes, pyrolysis produces energy fuels with high fuel -to-feed ratios, making it probably the most efficient process for biomass conversion and the method most capable of competing and eventually replacing non -renewable fossil fuel resources (Demirbas, 2006). Pyrolysis is the thermal decomposition of biomass occurring in the absence of oxygen. The word is derived from the Greek words “pyro” meaning fire and “lysi s” meaning decomposition or breaking down into constituent parts (Mohammad et al., 2010). Distribution of pyrolysis products depends on such operating conditions as type of feedstock, reaction time, pyrolysis temperatur e and sweep gas flow rate and also h igher temperature, smaller particle size, and increased heating rate resulted in decreased char yield from pyrolysis of agricultural residues (Itabiyi and Lucas, 2013). To obtain high liquid yield, the pyrolysis conditions require high heating rate , moderat e temperature (450 -550OC) and short vapor residence time (Mohan et al., 2006). Higher proportion of gas product is obtained from applying high temperature, low heating rate and long residence time, while slow heating at lower temperatures and long vapor residence time favor the formation of char product (Mohan et al., 2006; Nugranad, 1997; Onay and Koçkar, 2003) . Itabiyi , et al. (2011) revealed that that for particle sizes lesser than 2.03 mm, gas and char yields increases but resulting to a decrement in liquid yield were obtained as the particle size was decreased. Their study suggested that it is likely that the smaller size of biomass particles could affect greater heat transfer because of less temperature inside the par ticle, thus giving higher yields of released gases and volatiles. The investigation of this work was done, to study the effect of pyrolysis temperature on the product yields during the pyrolysis of Guinea -corn stalk. 2.0 Methodology 2.1 Gui nea-corn stalk preparation for experiment The Guinea -corn stalk (GCS) used for pyrolysis experiment in this s tudy, was procured from isale oyo area, oyo state of Nigeria. The large quantity of the residues causes environmental pollution, thus, it is needed to be removed. The process of cleaning the residues was done so as to remove the unwanted particle or dirt from the sample procured. The weight of the sample (W1) was measured using Ohaus top loading digital weighing scale of sensitivity ± 0.001 g (Model: PA4102, range: 0 -4100 g, Ohaus company, Manufactured in Switzerland) and then oven -dried at a temperature of 105OC until constant weig ht (W 2) was obtained in accordance with official methods of the ASTM D5373 -02 (2005). The proximate and ultimate analysis of the Guinea -corn stalk were experimentally carried out to ascertain if the Guinea -corn stalk were suitable for the thermo -chemical conversion process. The moisture content of the GCS was determined after sun drying 95% of the GCS for almost 23days until the weight of the GCS remain constant. For reasonable pyrolysis performance, moisture content of less than 7% is recommended (bridgw ater et al, 2001). 2.2 Experimental P rocedure The experiments on pyrolysis were carried out to determine the effect of temperature on the product yield of GCS. 223grams of dried CGS were introduced into the retort and then covered, tightened with a gasket incorporated to prevent gas leakage. T he retort was placed inside the electric furnace and pyrolysed by varying the temperature from 400OC to 600OC at 50Oc interval with a constant resident time of 20minutes. The retort wa s connected through a galvanized pipe to the condensate receiver which was place d inside an ice -cooling unit to aids the vapour condensation of the pyrolysis product from the retort. The condensate receiver was connected to the gas collection unit through rubber hose and tightened at both ends with clips. The gas collection unit has one inlet pipe which the impure gases from the condensate receiver flows in through and two outlet pipes. The water inside the gas collection unit is to filter the impure gases and the pressure of the gases displace some quantity of water through one of the outlet pipes. The filtered gases will then be tapped from the other outlet pipe into the gas cylinder. The weight of the char from the retort and the weight of the tar in the condensate receiver were determine using the ohaus top loading weighing balance and the gas weight was determine through subtraction as well as using water displacing method from the cylinder. 2.3 Product Yield Product yield is the ratio of the product w eight to the sample weight in percentage and were determined for the products separately by weighing each product of pyrolysis sample. 2.4 Char Yield The weight of the char W char, and the weight of the sample W s were determined according to the relations given above. Then the char yield was determined accordingly to relation: Char = 𝑊𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟 𝑊𝑠x 100 (2.1) 2.5 Tar Yield The determination of tar yield was done using the values of tar weight W tar and sample W s gotten above. Tar yield is then given as: Tar = 𝑊𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑊𝑠x 100 (2.2) 2.6 Gas Yield Gas yield was determined with the known weight of the gas and the weight of the sample as it is given in the relation as: Gas = 𝑊𝑔𝑎𝑠 𝑊𝑠x 100 (2.3) 3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1 Proximate and Ultimate Analyses As shown on Table 3.1, the proximate analysis of 2grams of the GCS sample by weight, 2.75cm diameter and 5.5cm by length was analyzed experimentally in which 14.5 8% of fixed carbon, 61.56% of volatile matter, 3.21% of ash content as well as 12.04% of moisture content were obtained. The ultimate analysis of the same weight, length and diameter of GCS was analyzed in which 52.67% of carbon, 5.76% of hydrogen, 42.17% of oxygen, 0.58% of nitrogen and 0.04% of Sulphur were obtained according to ASTM 3174 -76. Due to low percentage of Sulphur and nitrogen shows that the pyrolysis of guinea -corn stalk has little or no contribution to the global warming. According to ASTM 3174 -76, the heating value of the guinea -corn stalk was 19.95kJ/g. while that of pyrolysis products used calculating the energy yield on average basis are as follows: Char = 27.5 MJ/Kg; Tar = 16 MJ/Kg; Syngas = 20.44MJ/Kg (Jones et al, 2009). Table 3 .1: shows the result of the Proximate and Ultimate Analysis of the GCS PROXIMATE ANA LYSIS Fixed Carbon 14.58% Volatile Matter 61.56% Ash Content 3.21% Moisture Content 12.04% ULTIMATE ANALYSIS Carbon 52.67% Hydrogen 5.76% Oxygen 42.17 Nitrogen 0.58% Sulphur 0.04% 3.2 Results of Pyrolysis Products The following results were obtained during the process after the weight of 223grams of GCS was introduced into the retort at a temperature of 400 OC at a constant time of 20mins to produce 123.45 g of char, 62 .45 g of tar and 37.10 g of gas. At a temperature of 450 OC the weight of char reduced to 92.86 g and that of the tar increased to 76.50 g and the weight of the d gas increased to 53.64 g. At a temperature of 500 OC, the char had drastically decreased to 75.26 g, the weight of the tar increased to 81.52 g and the weight of the gas increased to 66.22 g at the same duration of 20mins. At a temperature of 550 OC, the char decreased to 65.91 g, the weight of the tar increased to 87.28 g and the weight of the g as increased to 69.81g at the same duration of 20mins. At a temperature of 600 OC, the char had slightly decreased to 60.43 g, the weight of the tar decreased slightly to 86.17 g and the weight of the gas increased to 76.40 g at the same duration of 20mins as shown in T able 3 .2 below. The bar chart in Figure 3.1 shows the relationship among the pyrolysis products in which at 4000C, char possess the highest bar with the gas having the lowest bar. At a temperature of 6000C, the tar possess the highest bar wit h the char having the lowest bar which illustrate that as the temperature increases the char weight decreases, tar weight and the gas weight increases. Table 3.2 : Result of the P yrolysis of GCS within Temperature ranges of 4000C to 600 0C. Trials Initial Wt Final Wt Temperature Char Tar biogas (g) (g) (0C) (g) (g) (g) 1. 250 223 400 123.45 62.45 37.10 2. 250 223 450 92.86 76.50 53.64 3. 250 223 500 75.26 81.52 66.22 4. 250 223 550 65.91 87.28 69.81 5. 250 223 600 60.43 86.17 76.40 Figure 3.1: S hows the relationship between temperature and the pyrolysis product using bar chart. 020406080100120140 400 450 500 550 600WEIGHT OF THE PYRLOYSIS PRODUCT TEMPERATUREChar Tar Gas 3.3 Result of the Product Yields The Pyrolysis product include the char, tar and syngas 3.4 Bio -Char From T able 3 .4, the result shows that at 4000C, the weight of the char was 123.45grams which represent 55.36% of the char yield. Between the pyrolysis temperature of 550 and 600 0C, there were no further steady decrease in the char yield i.e. 29.56% and 27.10% which indicates the region where formati on of ash begins as shown in F igure3 .2. At approximately 6500C, there is a mixture of char and ash. It was observed that the quantity of char produced decreases with increase in pyrolysis temperature. This shows how the weight of the residue reduces as the volatile matter (tar and gas) were produced. However, at temperature above 6000C, there were no further increase in the production of volatiles which symbolizes the end of the pyrolysis process. Table 3.3 : Result of char yield between temperature ranges of 4000C and 6000C. Trials Dried Sample Temperature Char Weight Char Yield (g) (0C) (g) (%) 1. 223 400 123.45 55.36 2. 223 450 92.86 41.64 3. 223 500 75.26 33.75 4. 223 550 65.91 29.56 5. 223 600 60.43 27.10 Temperature OC350 400 450 500 550 600 650Bio char weight in grams 5060708090100110120130 Figure 3.2: Shows the relationship between temperature and the bio -char weight. 3.5 Tar Yiel d Table 3.4 shows that 62.45 g which represent just 28.00 % of the product yield at 4000C (Fig. 3.3) was obtained. The quantity of the tar produced is low compare to other products and the maximum yield is approximately 38.64% which may only be affected by the moisture content present in the sample. Figure 3 .3 shows how the weight of the tar increases as the pyrolysis temperature increases. The quantity of the tar produced during the pyrolysis increases with increase in pyrolysis temperature until when the g uinea -corn stalk fully pyrolysed. The tar is the composition of the condensable gases and water present in residue as moisture initially. Table 3.4 : Result of tar yield between temperature ranges of 4000C and 6000C. Trials Weight of dried Temperature Tar Weight Tar Yield Sample (g) (0C) (g) (%) 1. 223 400 62.45 28.00 2. 223 450 76.50 34.30 3. 223 500 81.52 36.56 4. 223 550 87.28 39.14 5. 223 600 86.17 38.64 350 400 450 500 550 600 65060657075808590 Temperature OCBio-tar weight in grams Figure3.3: S hows the relationship between temperature and the bio -tar weight. 3.6 Biogas Table 3.5 shows how the quantity of biogas produced increases with increase in pyrolysis temperature. At 4000C, 37.10grams which represent 16.64% yield of the products were produced. In-between 5500C and 6000C, yield of about 31.30% to 34.26% of the product w as ach ieved as shown in figure 3 .4. Figure 3 .4 Explained how the product yield of biogas increases with the increase in Pyrolysis temperature. At higher temperature, pyrolysis process ends before 20 minutes as no further pressure is built inside the condensate r eceiver. The biogas is the combination of gases which include methane, carbon -monoxide, hydrogen and carbon -dioxide. The weight of biogas increase as the pyrolysis temperature increases. They were firstly separated from the vaporized mixture at a very low temperature from condensate receiver and collected over water. Table 3.5 : Result of gas yield between temperature ranges of 4000C and 6000C Trials Dried Sample Temperature Biogas Biogas Yield (g) (0C) (g) (%) 1. 223 400 37.10 16.64 2. 223 450 53.64 24.06 3. 223 500 66.22 29.69 4. 223 550 69.81 31.30 5. 223 600 76.40 34.26 350 400 450 500 550 600 650304050607080Bio-gas weight in grams Temperature OC Figure3.4: S hows the relationship between temperature and the bio -gas weight. Table 3.6 : Comparison of Products Yield with Pyrolysis Temperature Trials Temperature Char Yield Tar Yield Syngas Yield (0C) (%) (%) (%) 1. 400 55.26 28.00 16.64 2. 450 41.64 34.30 24.06 3. 500 33.75 36.56 29.69 4. 550 29.56 39.14 31.30 5 600 27.10 38.64 34.26 Average Yield 31.86 37.19 30.49 Figure 3.5: S hows the relationship between temperature and the pyrolysis product yield using bar chart. 0102030405060 400 450 500 550 600PERCENTAGE YIELD BY WEIGTH PYROLYSIS TEMPERATUREChar Tar Gas 4.0 Conclusion This study shown that GCS can be used to produce pyrolysis products (char, tar and gas) at variable temperature. Generally, as the pyrolysis temperature increases the bio -char decreases and vice - versa. It’s also observed that the bio –tar increases as the temperature increases but once the temperature reaches 550OC, the bio -tar decreases and also, the amount of the gas increases at a high temperature.