This paper made an attempt to enlighten the safety parameter of monopole with the Lattice tower transmission line design in urban areas, where required right o f way is constraint. Pipe section for monopole and a four -legged section for lattice tower have been chosen as tower profiles. The new generation composite conductors and Steel Reinforced conductors’ properties have been examined for an integral approach. The analysis is carried out with IS 802 (Part -1/Sec -1): 2015 and IS 875(Part3) -2015 revised code versions for 60 m height and 250 m span. It is concluded that the Monopole pipe sections are 6.7% less in weight than the four -legged lattice tower with compos ite conductors. While comparing the design philosophy of IS 802:2015 code and IS 875 -2015 versions, former code contributed an economic design when compared to IS 875 -2015 loading procedure. It is further extended that in terms of weight comparison, monop ole and four -legged towers have illustrated as 30% & 9.18% less in comparison with IS 875 Code procedure. Keywords: Tower anatomy, Monopole, Four -legged tower, Composite conductor, IS: 802 (Part -1/Sec -1): 2015, IS (875(part3) -2015 Ramesh Bantupalli, Sharon Potireddy, Baljai K.V.G.D, Santhosh Kumar B http://www.iaeme.com/ IJARET/index. asp 80 editor@iaeme.com Cite this Article: Ramesh Bantupalli, Sharon Potireddy, Baljai K.V.G.D, Santhosh Kumar B , Advantages of Monopole Transmission Tower with New Generation Conductors , International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), 11 (3), 2020, pp 79-90. http://www.iaeme.com/IJARET/issues.asp?JType=IJARET&VType=11&IType=3 1. INTRODUCTION Historically, lattice and Compact towers have been used to support transmission and distribution lines in India. As India's population increases and area available to accommodate transmission lines become scarce and more expensive, steel pipe poles would provide a viable alternative in India. However, recently tubular poles made from stronger materials such as steel, have gained utility market share in India, as well. T ransmission poles can be installed in locations where limited space is available due to smaller footprint compared to lattice towers. Moreover, Transmission poles are installed in places with existing corridors already used by other projects such as highwa ys, roads, rail tracks, rivers and etc., Usage of restricted space allows monopole a more direct line design which results in optimizing the total line cost, Remove “visual” pollution, Pole structures are compatible with the environment i.e. poles are environment -friendly structures. The pole structure has i) Less right -of-way (ii) Better Visual Appearance (iii) Less components, faster installation, and less Installation Cost (iv) Better reliability under extreme conditions (v) Design Flexibility (vi)Future maintenance and repairs (vii) Safety (viii) Vandalism, Conical/Pipe Poles. To capture the latest developments and innovations of monopole towers with New Generation Conductors, with Environmental and Ecological Awakening is explained [1, 2]. Historically the steel pipe poles specification was hinted briefly in 1985 Indian standard code for 11kV overhead power lines and simple, in case ROW costs are high or if the width of ROW is limited the vertical configuration is may give a lower line cost . The weight o f the tower supporting the conductor and consequently its cost depends on tower height which is maximum sag at design span and minimum ground clearance between the charged line and ground as per Indian electricity rules. For the safety of electrical instal lations, the IEC technical guidelines demand the minimum Factor of Safety be maintained in tensioning the conductor. Hence the applied tension is at half of the rated ultimate strength. If the supports for the conductor at each end of a span are at the sam e elevation, the low point of the conductor is in the middle of the span and each structure will support one -half of the conductor weight. In this case, the effective span is equal to the actual span. Generally, transmission tower cost varies from 28 % to 42% of the total cost [1, 3-6]. With the evolutionary generation conductors, design flexibility and environmental and ecological awakenings this paper examine the variation of internal parameters of 60 m high pipe monopole and four -legged lattice tower ge ometrics along with the Steel reinforced conductor and composite conductor with IS 802(part1/section 1)2015[7] code provisions for the mechanical sag and temperature stringing procedure. The serviceability parameters investigated are sag and tension, defl ections, tilt, and the overall economy is examined with weight consideration. 2. LITERATURE REVIEW (CEI/IEC/826 -1994 -04, 1991)[8] recommended the probabilistic climatic loads to avoid the cascading effects due not to fail for the first 90% failure of the primary member strengths, this report considers the strength of the tower is the primary factor in the tower system, while the strength of the conductors are more reliable because the maximum strength used is far less than the damage limit s. [9].This report recommended the non -linear analysis (P -∆) for Narrow Advantages of Monopole Transmission Tower with New Generation Conductors http://www.iaeme.com/ IJARET/index. asp 81 editor@iaeme.com base tower design if the tower deflection obtained from analysis exceeds 2.5% of tower height. While detailed information regarding the P -∆ is made for pole structures and suggested the 2% of pol e height of deflection for the preliminary design of poles. [6].Wind load on tower and conductor are transverse load in reliability and failure loads are security condition loads. Sag is inversely proportional to tension in the conductor at null points. This technical report [10] focused on local weather and climatic conditions, as local conditions may indicate the use of heavier loading conditions than those prescribed by NESC for that general area while designing a particular transmission line. The maximum span is attainable with a given structure height and a given conductor clearance above level ground. ACSR (Aluminium conductor, steel -reinforced) conductor has been used dated back 1945, because of its lower price, which has proved more economical than ot her conductors, such as copper or Copper weld -copper [1, 11]. The physical and electrical properties are also described in these