1988 Lancang–Gengma earthquakes. On 6 November 1988, two earthquakes struck Lancang and Gengma counties, Yunnan, near the China–Myanmar border. These earthquakes measured moment magnitude () 7.0 and 6.9, respectively, spaced 12 minutes apart. These earthquakes were assigned a maximum China seismic intensity of IX and X, respectively. Between 748 and 939 people were killed; more than 7,700 were injured. Both earthquakes caused damage and economic losses estimated at CN¥ 2.05 billion (CN¥ billion in ). Moderately large aftershocks continued to rock the region, causing additional casualties and damage.

Tectonic setting

The Shan Plateau is crisscrossed by strike-slip faults to accommodate crustal rotation of the Sunda Block and deformation as a result of the India–Asia collision, where the Indian plate is underthrusted beneath the Eurasian plate. The Shan Plateau formed by uplift along the Shan Scarp Fault Zone, an inactive shear zone and thrust fault along its western base. Located east of the Shan Scarp Fault is the active Sagaing Fault, a dextral transform fault that separates the Burma plate from the Sunda plate. At the northern boundary of the Shan Plateau lies the Red River Fault, an active  long dextral fault.

Earthquakes in this part of Southeast Asia (the Shan Plateau) usually display focal mechanisms corresponding to shallow left-lateral (sinistral) and right-lateral (dextral) strike-slip faulting. Shear deformation between the Red River and Sagaing faults causes bookshelf-style faulting which manifests in predominantly dextral faulting within the Shan Plateau. Sinistral systems follow an east–northeast or east–west trend for several hundred kilometers, offsetting the Mekong and Salween rivers. Dextral structures follow a north-west or north-southernly strike. The earthquakes of 1988 were the result of slip along a dextral fault zone.

In 1995, another earthquake measuring 6.8  struck the same area. It left at least 11 people dead, destroyed over 100,000 homes, and damaged an additional 42,000. The earthquake may have been triggered by the transfer of stress from the 1988 events.

Earthquakes

These earthquakes originated along the Longlin–Lancang Fault Zone; a northwest–southeast striking, -long structure. Its northern section is a single strand while the southern section comprises a complex anastomosis of faults. Forming in the early to mid-Miocene, this dextral fault has accumulated  of displacement. Its estimated slip rate is  per year. It was previously a sinistral fault as  of left-lateral offset was observed in a batholith from geological studies.

The first mainshock measured  7.0 to 7.7. It generated a surface ruptures with right-lateral offsets of  and a small reverse component. The maximum measured dextral surface offset was  and vertical offset was . These ruptures followed a north–northwest strike for about . It ruptured an estimated –-long by -km-wide fault zone extending northwest–southeast. The rupture propagated with a velocity of  per second.

A  6.9 shock struck  north–northwest of the first some 12 minutes later. The rupture area was nearly twice that of the first event. They are largest earthquakes to affect both the Chinese–Myanmar border region since 1970 ( 7.7) and 1912 ( 7.8), respectively.

Aftershocks 
By 20 December, the Kunming Telemetered Seismic Network had recorded over 600 aftershocks greater than  3.0. Three of the largest had  of 6.1, 6.3 and 6.7 on 15, 27 and 30 November, respectively. The aftershocks were distributed in a pattern consistent with a north–northwest trending fault responsible for the mainshocks. These aftershocks caused additional damage and injuries. On 7 May 1989, a  5.6 aftershock killed one and left 91 others injured. It also caused damage totaling US$54 million and affected 5,300 homes in Gengma County.

Intensity 

The first shock was assigned a maximum intensity of IX on the China seismic intensity scale. This zone had an axis length of , with its widest width at , covering a  area. It extended northwest–southeast from Mujia to Zhutang Township. The northeast border lie along the eastern bank of the Heihe River, west of Fubang Township. Landslides, surface ruptures, liquefaction and ground failure were observed.

Intensity VIII encompassed Xuelin Wa Ethnic Township in Mujia Township to the north, and Zhutang Township to the southeast. Within this zone was Ximeng County to the west. This zone had an axis length of  and a width of , covering an area of . Nearly every house in the region collapsed, with very few left intact. The earthquake also caused landslides and ground failures throughout.

Cangyuan County in the north to Shangyun, and Lancang County in the south were within the area of VII. The western boundary also extended into Ximeng County, well beyond the Myanmar–China border, into Shan State. Damage was less extreme although some houses collapsed. Light homes remained intact, and much of the damage to ordinary homes reported include cracking of walls. Landslides, ground cracks and sand boils occurred. This zone covered a large area of . The evaluated Mercalli intensity in Chiang Mai was VI (Strong) based on some damaged buildings.

The second mainshock had a maximum intensity of X. The zone included Gengma County to the north, and Yanshuai towards the south, Tuanjie Township, Cangyuan County to the east, and Mengsheng Township, Cangyuan County in the west. Many houses totally collapsed or were severely compromised in this zone. Many buildings were also seriously damaged. Lightly constructed homes collapsed or tilted due to damage resulting from the rupture. Liquefaction and fissures ejecting water were observed. This zone is a north-west ellipse with a major axis of  and a minor axis of , covering an area of . The intensity VIII zone extended from Gengma in the north to Yanshuai and Nuoliang Township in the south. Few homes remained standing and lightweight houses tilted. Damage to the ground was identical to those observed in the zone of IX. This zone followed a north-west ellipse area of .

Aiguo New Village, Gengxuan Town, Gengma County in the north, to south of the Shuangjiang River in the east, to south of Lancang Shangyun in the south, and west to Minliang of Menglai Township, Cangyuan County in the west were within the intensity VII zone. Adobe houses totally collapsed as a result. Intensity VII was felt for an area of . Intensity VI from the second shock covered an area of .

Damage and casualties

Early figures of fatalities were 18 and 37, which could not be revised due to the communication disruptions. Over the next few days, international media reported at least 600 inhabitants killed, mainly in the village of Shanmato which was obliterated. Telecommunication services were cut and severely disrupted. This meant provincial government officials could not provide updated figures on the dead.

On 9 November, the death toll totaled 938. Chinese officials stated 748 people died; at least 7,700 people seriously injured; over 3 million affected and 267,000 homeless. They added that the death toll could have been higher had the earthquakes struck near a city. When the earthquakes struck, many residents were outdoors, which factored in the unexpectedly low death toll. A fatality figure of 938 was given to the United Nations and became widely reported. The reported death toll by the International Disasters Data Base was 939. It was regarded as China's "worst earthquake in more than a decade". At the time of the earthquakes, the population of Lancang and Gengma counties were 237,000 and 81,000, respectively. In Lancang County, at least 607 people died including 279 in Zhanmapo.

Seventeen counties were heavily damaged. Many homes, roads and communication lines in Lancang and Mengliang counties were destroyed. An estimated 200,000 buildings including 144,000 houses were razed. Over 1.308 million rooms collapsed and 934,800 were damaged. At least 500,000 buildings including 253,000 homes were badly damaged. More than 4,000 essential facilities in Yunnan were damaged. About 1,000 schools, 98 clinics and 29 reservoirs were destroyed. Landslides in the area also damaged highways. The majority of homes constructed of wood and mud, collapsed due to the extreme ground motions, killing its inhabitants. Over  of rockslides damaged highways and blocked rivers, halting water transportation. Kunming, the capital of Yunnan Province, was undamaged, although the earthquakes were felt strongly. The total cost of damage was estimated at CN¥ 2.05 billion (CN¥ billion in ).

Many buildings generally fared well during the earthquakes because of improved construction practices and seismic retrofitting works prior. Buildings which had survived were built with the consideration of the local seismic hazard. Some buildings including a cinema which was designed to withstand seismic intensity VIII and a residential block made to resist intensity IX were undamaged. These buildings were strengthened before the earthquakes. In Thailand, additional damage occurred in Chiang Rai and shaking was felt on skyscrapers in Bangkok. Strong to weak shaking was felt in Thailand, Laos, Vietnam and Bangladesh. In Bangkok, Thailand, people on high-rise buildings felt weak shaking. The highest floors of the Charn Issara Tower, a 27-story building, swayed for a few minutes.

Response 

Due to its remote location and the lack of communication and damaged roads, rescue and aid transportation efforts faced difficulties getting to the affected areas. Rescuers and medical personnel only reached the affected zone on 9 November. The Yunnan government ordered an airlift of medical and relief supplies to help those affected. The governor of Yunnan Province, He Zhiqiang, along with several medical doctors were brought to the disaster scene. Several thousand troops and many military vehicles also visited the affected areas, according to the Ministry of Civil Affairs.

Much information about the earthquakes and its devastation were hidden by the Chinese government due to ongoing political and cultural reforms at the time. In the early decades of China's communist regime, the guideline was that natural disasters and accidents would not be disclosed unless foreign nationals were involved. It was only in the few years prior to 1988 were these events publicized. At a press conference following the earthquakes, officials disclosed that a magnitude 7.7 event in 1970 resulted in 10,000 deaths. Chinese officials called for international assistance in response to possible aftershocks. The World Food Programme and United Nations Development Programme said the nation encouraged international groups and governments to provide aid, and that plastic sheets for shelter, medicine and food were the most important items.

See also 
 1976 Longling earthquake
 List of earthquakes in 1988
 List of earthquakes in China
 List of earthquakes in Myanmar
 List of earthquakes in Yunnan
 List of earthquakes in Thailand

References

External links
 Aftershocks M4.0 or greater from 1988 to 2000 (USGS)
  (First event)
  (Second event)

Earthquakes in Myanmar
Earthquakes in Thailand
Earthquakes in Yunnan
1988 disasters in China
November 1988 events in Asia
1988 earthquakes
Lancang Lahu Autonomous County
Doublet earthquakes
1988 in Burma
China–Myanmar border
1988 disasters in Myanmar
November 1988 in China