Lawler's algorithm. Lawler's algorithm is an efficient algorithm for solving a variety of constrained scheduling problems, particularly single-machine scheduling. It can handle precedence constraints between jobs, requiring certain jobs to be completed before other jobs can be started. It can schedule jobs on a single processor in a way that minimizes the maximum tardiness, lateness, or any function of them.

Definitions
There are n jobs. Each job is denoted by  and has the following characteristics:

 Processing-time, denoted by pi;
 Due time, denoted by .
 Cost function, denoted by ; it is a weakly-increasing function of the time job i completes its execution, denoted by . 

The objective function is . Some special cases are:

 When , the objective function corresponds to minimizing the maximum lateness
 When , the objective corresponds to minimizing the maximum tardiness.

Algorithm
The algorithm builds the schedule back to front. For each scheduling step, it looks only at the tasks that no other tasks depend on, and puts the one with the latest due date at the end of the schedule queue. Then it repeats this process until all jobs are scheduled. 

The algorithm works by planning the job with the least impact as late as possible. Starting at  that   is the processing time of job .

  set of already scheduled jobs (at start: S = )
  set of jobs whose successors have been scheduled (at start: all jobs without successors)
  time when the next job will be completed (at start: )
 while do
     select  such that 
     schedule  such that it completes at time 
     add  to , delete  from  and update .
     
 end while

Example 1
Assuming there are three jobs: t1, t2, and t3, with the following precedence constraints:
 t1-> t2, t1 must finish before t2
 t1-> t3, t1 must finish before t3
And the following deadlines (due date in a month)
 t1: 2nd day
 t2: 5th day
 t3: 8th day

Now we construct the required set of jobs:
 S = {empty},  initially empty set of scheduled jobs
 J = {t2, t3}, the set of jobs whose successors have been scheduled or jobs without successors. t2 and t3 have no successors.
Repeat the following steps until J is empty:
 select a job j in J, so its due date is the latests, in this example, it is t3 with a due date 8th.
 move j from J to S's front, now J = {t2}, S={t3}.
 update J to add any new job whose successors have been scheduled. There is none this time. 
Do the next round: 
 select a job j in J, so its due date is the latests. It is t2 with due date 5th this time.
 move j from J to S's front, now J = {empty}, S={t2, t3}
 update J to add any new job whose successors have been scheduled, now J= {t1} since both t2 and t3 have been scheduled.
Do the next round: 
 select a job j in J={t1}, so its due date is the latests. This example, it is t1.
 move j from J to S's front, now J = {empty}, S={t1, t2, t3}
 update J to add any new job whose successors have been scheduled. Nothing to add. 
J is now empty. The end.

So the final schedule is t1 -> t2-> t3 as S = {t1, t2, t3}

Example 2
A more complex example, with simplified steps:
The jobs and precedence constraints are shown below: a parent node --> child node in the tree.
      j1 
     (2) 
    /   \
   j2    j3 
  (2)    (4)
  / \     |
 j4 j5   j6
(3) (5)  (6)  
The due dates of jobs are shown underneath of each node of the tree in parentheses. 
 j1: 2
 j2: 5
 j3: 4
 j4: 3
 j5: 5
 j6: 6
Now look at the set of jobs without any successors, find the one with latest due date, put it into the front of S: 
 The S set would be { j1, j2, j4, j3, j5, j6}

References

Further reading
 Michael Pinedo. Scheduling: theory, algorithms, and systems. 2008. 
 Conway, Maxwell, Miller. Theory of Scheduling. 1967. 

Production planning
Optimal scheduling