Potestas (socialis et politica)

Potestas in scientia sociali rebusque publicis est humana morum aliorum movendorum facultas. Vocabulum auctoritas potestati a legitimá structurá sociali perceptae saepe adhibetur. Potestas videri potest et bona et mala (vel etiam iniusta). Fundamentale potestatis adhibitae genus endemicum in nostrá specie videtur; quia autem homines sunt entia socialia, eadem notio videri potest bona, res hereditate excepta vel ad proposita humanistica adhibenda data quae adiuvabunt, movebunt, aliisque potestatem dabunt (e.g. societas fundata Gatesiana de eradicatione poliomyelitis).Luthans, Luthans, et Luthans 2015: 290–91.

Plerumque a rebus interdependentiae inter binas entitates et circumiecta derivatur. In negotiis, ethica potestatis instrumentalitas est res gesta, et sic est ludus summae zeri. Verbis simplicibus, exprimi potest aut sursum aut deorsum. De potestate deorsum, superior organizationis homo inferiores movet ut fines negotii adipiscantur; cum autem societas potestatem sursum adhibet, inferiores sunt qui decreta eorum ducis vel ducum moveant.

Usus potestatis nec vim nec minas virium (coercitionem) non semper implicat. Simillimus est rei quam civitates aequabiles (e.g. Dania, Nederlandia, Norvegia, Suecia) gratia appellare possunt, contra rem extremam quae nonnulli auctores in civitatibus capitalisticis minas appellare possunt, rationem quá potestas adhibetur.Handy 1993. Exemplum potestatis sine oppressione adhibitae est notio potestatis mollis, contra potestatem duram.

Multae recentiores disputationes sociologicae de potestate modum tractant quo potestas facultatem rebus det; quod significat potestatem esse rationem quae actiones sociales tam facere quam cogere vel etiam prohibere potest. Michael Foucault, philosophus Francicus, potestatem videbat expressionem structuralem "strategicam rem multiplicem in datá re sociali,"Anglice "a complex strategic situation in a given social setting" (Gordon 1980). quae ambas vim et facultatem poscit.

Anarchia
Auctoritas
Auctoritas (ius)
Cratologia
Democratia
Despotismus
Disciplina
Ducatus
Heros
Thomas Hobbesius
Imperium
Maiestas
Mana
Fridericus Nietzsche
Nobilitas
Norma socialis
Oligarchia
Potestas floralis
Rectio
Regnum
Res novae
Separatio potestatum
Tyrannis
Veto
Maximilianus Weber

Notae

Bibliographia
Aldrich, Robert, et Gary Wotherspoon, eds. 2001. Who's Who in Contemporary Gay & Lesbian History: From World War II to the Present Day. Novi Eboraci: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-22974-X.
Clastres, Pierre. 1974. La société contre l'Etat.
Collins, B., et B. Raven. 1969. "Group structure: attraction, coalitions, communication and power." The Handbook of Social Psychology 4: 156–183.
Dolata, Ulrich, et Jan-Felix Schrape. 2018. Collectivity and Power on the Internet: A Sociological Perspective. Londinii: Springer. ISBN 9783319784137. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78414-4.
Gordon, Collin. 1980. "Forward." In Power/Knowledge, libro Michaelis Foucault. Novi Eboraci: Pantheon Books.
Dowding, Keith. 1996. Power. University of Minnesota Press.
Eldred, Michael. 2008. Social Ontology: Recasting Political Philosophy through a Phenomenology of Whoness. Francofurti: Ontos Verlag. ISBN 978-3-938793-78-7.
French, J. R. P., et B. Raven. 1959. "The bases of social power." In Studies in Social Power, ed. Dorwin Cartwright Ann Arbor Michiganiae: University of Michigan Press.
Gramsci, Antonio. 1969. Elementi di politica. Romae: Editori Riuniti.
Handy, Charles. 1993. Understanding Organizations. Ed. 4a. Londinii: Penguin. ISBN 9780140156034.
Izquierdo Brichs, Ferran. 2008.  Poder y Felicidad, una propuesta de sociología del poder. Matriti: La Catarata.
Izquierdo Brichs, Ferran, ed. 2013. Political Regimes in the Arab World: Society and the Exercise of Power. Londinii: Routledge.
Izquierdo Brichs, Ferran, ed. 2009. Poder y regímenes en el mundo árabe contemporáneo. Barcinonae: Cidob/Bellaterra.
Kanter, R. M. 1979. "Power failures in management circuits." Harvard Business Review.
Luthans, Fred, Brett C. Luthans, et Kyle W. Luthans. 2015. Organizational Behavior: An Evidence Based Approach. Ed. 13a. IAP Inc. ISBN 978-1-68123-121-1. Pagina 290 apud Google Books.
Martin, Roderick. 1977. The sociology of power. Londinii et Bostoniae: Routledge & Kegan Paul. ISBN 071008563X 
Martínez-Ferro, Hernán. 2010. "Legitimidad, dominación y derecho en la teoría sociológica del Estado de Max Weber." Revista Estudios Socio-Jurídicos 12 (1): 405-27.
Rose, Nikolas S. 1996. Inventing our selves: psychology, power, and personhood. Cantabrigiae et Novi Eboraci: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521434149.
Schein, Larry E., et Virginia E. Greiner. 1988. Power and organization development: mobilizing power to implement change. Reading Massachusettae: Addison-Wesley. ISBN 978-0201121858.
Simmel, Georg. 1896a. "Superiority and Subordination as Subject-Matter of Sociology." American Journal of Sociology 2: 167–89.
Simmel, Georg. 1896b. "Superiority and Subordination as Subject-Matter of Sociology II." American Journal of Sociology 2: 392–415.
Vatiero, M. 2009. Understanding Power: A "Law and Economics" Approach. VDM Verlag. ISBN 978-3-639-20265-6.
Wolf, E., ed. (1989) 2001. Facing power: Old insights, new questions. Berkeleiae: University of California Press.
Weber, Max, ed. (1922) 1964. Economía y Sociedad. Mexici: FCE.
Weber, Max. 2012. Sociología del Poder: Tipos de Dominación. Alianza Editorial. ISBN 9788420669472.

Nexus externi

Categoria:Michael Foucault
Categoria:Notiones philosophicae