Kọmitii asọmpi nke India

Kọmịsh nwanne nke India (CCI) bụ onye isi isi mba na India .  Ọ bụ ụlọ ọrụ iwu n'ime Ministry of Corporate Affairs ma na-ahụ maka ịmanye iwu, 2002 iji kwalite na ọrụ mmemme ndị nwere ike ike na-ahụ na India.  CCI na-eleba anya na ikpe wee kwuo ha ma ọ bụrụ na otu ahụ nwere ike ike na-ahụ.

E hiwere kọmitii a na 14 Ọktoba 2003. Ọ na-arụ ọrụ nke ọma na Mee 2009 yana Dhanendra Kumar dị ka onye isi oche mbụ ya.  [1] [2] Onye isi oche nke CCI ugbu a bụ Ravneet Kaur, onye ikera ka onye ọrụ na 2023.

 Iwu asọmpi, 2002 
E chepụtara echiche nke Commission Competition ma weba ya n'ụdị nke echiche iwu, 2002 site n'aka ike Vajpayee .  Ọ dị mkpa iji kwalite na ụlọ ọrụ nkeonwe.

 Iwu ahụ amachibidoro echere na-anya, iji ụlọ ọrụ na-eme ihe n'ụzọ na- Iṣakoso isi ma na-achịkwa (ịnweta, njikwa na ngwaahịa na nnweta), nke na-akpata ma ọ bụ nwere ike ibu ụzọ .  n'uche ntụrụndụ na n'ime India. </ref>

A na-achọ imezu nke omume ahụ site na Competition Commission of India (CCI), nke mmalite etiti hibere site na 14 Ọktoba 2003. CCI nwere onye isi oche na ndị otu isii nke ọrịa etiti.  Ọ bụ ọrụ nke kọmitii ahụ iji ike omume ndị na-enwe ike ngwaahịa na , kwalite na echebe, chebe nke ndị na-azụahụa ma hụ na akwụkwọ ahụ, akara India.  [1] Kọmishọna a chọkwara echiche echiche maka okwu n'akwụkwọ ntụaka enwetara n'aka ụlọ ọrụ iwu akwụkwọ n'okpuru iwu ọ ngo na-achọta azịza. 

 ebumnobi 


 Okwu mmalite nke Iwu asọmpi 
"The Competition Act – Act No. 12 of 2003" (PDF). Competition Commission of India. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 June 2012. Retrieved 10 October 2012.Iwu iji nye, na-eburu n'uche akụ na-ahụ nke mba ahụ, maka Commission, iji iji omume ndị na-enwe ike ngwaahịa na, ìhè na-echebe n'ahịa, iji chebe ụfọdụ ndị na-azụ ahịa.  na iji hụ na ada onwe.  ahia nke ndị isi ụfọdụ n'ahịa, na India na-aga, yana maka ihe ngosi ya ma ọ bụ na ike

Iji mezuo ebumnuche ya, Commission Competition nke India na-agba mbọ ime ihe ndị a:

 Mee ka ahịa na-arụ ọrụ maka abamuru na ọdịmma nke ndị na-azụ ahịa.
 Gbaa mbọ hụ na asọmpi ziri ezi na ahụike na mmemme akụ na ụba na mba maka uto ngwa ngwa yana gụnyere mmepe na mmepe akụ na ụba.
 Mejuputa atumatu asọmpi n'ebumnobi iji rụpụta ihe kacha arụ ọrụ nke akụrụngwa akụ na ụba.
 Zụlite ma na-azụlite mmekọrịta dị irè na mmekọrịta ya na ndị na-ahụ maka ngalaba iji hụ na a kwadoro nke ọma nke iwu nhazi ngalaba na iwu asọmpi.
 Mepụta nkwado asọmpi nke ọma ma gbasaa ozi gbasara uru asọmpi n'etiti ndị niile metụtara iji guzobe na ịzụlite omenala asọmpi na akụnụba India.

 Ihe mejupụtara 
alt=Competition Commission of India (CCI)|thumb| Shri Ashok Chawla, onye bụbu onye isi oche nke Commission Competition nke India, na Mr. Joaquin Almunia, osote onye isi oche nke European Commission, na-edebanye aha na Memorandum of Understanding on Cooperation in the Field of Competition Law na 21st November 2013. 
Kọmishana ahụ nwere onye isi oche na ọ bụghị ihe na- mmetụta mmadụ abụọ na ọ bụghị ihe isii ndị ọzọ na-egosi mgbaàmà.  Ravneet Kaur bụ onye isi oche nke CCI ogbugbu a.  [1] Ndị otu Commission Competition nke India bụ 

 Ravneet Kaur
 Anil Agarwal
 Sweta Kakkad
 Deepak Anurag

 Okwu ikpe ama ama 

 In December 2010, CCI instituted a probe to examine if there was any cartelization among traders when onion prices touched 80 rupees, but did not find sufficient evidence of market manipulation.
 In June 2012, CCI imposed a fine of  on 11 cement companies for cartelisation. CCI claimed that cement companies met regularly to fix prices, control market share and hold back supply which earned them illegal profits.
 In January 2013, CCI modified clauses in agreements between real estate company DLF Limited and apartment buyers. Business and finance portal Moneycontrol.com welcomed the order saying that, "This is a landmark ruling and will benefit property owners across the country". Some of the important modifications were:
 The Builder cannot undertake any additional construction beyond the approved building plan given to the buyers.
 The builder will not have complete ownership of open spaces within the residential project area not sold.
 Not just the buyer but the builder will be liable for any defaults.
 All payments made by the buyers must be based on construction milestones and not "on demand".
 The builder will not have the sole power to form the owner’s association.
 On 8 February 2013, CCI imposed a penalty of  on the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) for misusing its dominant position. The CCI found that IPL team ownership agreements were unfair and discriminatory and that the terms of the IPL franchise agreements were loaded in favor of BCCI and franchises had no say in the terms of the contract. The CCI ordered BCCI to "cease and desist" from any practice in future denying market access to potential competitors and not use its regulatory powers in deciding matters relating to its commercial activities.
 In 2014, CCI imposed a fine of ₹10 million upon Google for failure to comply with the directions given by the Director General seeking information and documents.
 On 25 August 2014, CCI imposed a fine of ₹2544 crores on 14 Indian car manufacturers for failure to provide branded spare parts and diagnostic tools to independent repairers, hampering their ability to repair and maintain certain car models. The companies fined were Maruti Suzuki, Mahindra & Mahindra, Tata Motors, Toyota, Honda, Volkswagen, Fiat, Ford, General Motors, Nissan, Hindustan Motors, Mercedes Benz and Skoda.
 On 17 November 2015, CCI imposed a fine of ₹258 crores upon three airlines for cartelization in determining the fuel surcharge on air cargo. A penalty of  was imposed on Jet Airways, while InterGlobe Aviation Limited (Indigo) and SpiceJet were levied  and  respectively.
 In May 2017, CCI ordered a probe into the functioning of the Cellular Operators Association of India following a complaint filed by Reliance Jio against the cartelization by its rivals Bharati Airtel, Vodafone India and Idea cellular.
 On 8 February 2018, it had fined Google's parent company, Alphabet Inc. for  for search bias.
 On August 12, 2018, the CCI approved the Disney-Fox deal.
 In July 2018 the Commission imposed fines on the Federation of Gujarat State Chemists and Druggists Association, the Amdavad Chemist Association, the Surat Chemists and Druggists Association, the Chemists and Druggists Association of Baroda, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Hetero Healthcare Ltd, Divine Saviour and their staff and officers for breaches of the Competition Act 2002 by requiring No Objection Certificates before appointing stockists.
 In May 2019, Umar Javeed, Sukarma Thapar, Aaqib Javeed vs. Google LLC &amp; Ors. the commission ordered an antitrust probe against Google for abusing its dominant position with Android to block market rivals. In its Prima Facie opinion the commission held, "Mandatory Pre-installation of entire Google Mobile Services (GMS) suite under Mobile application distribution agreements MADA amounts to imposition of unfair condition on the device manufacturers. Leveraging of Google's dominance in Google Play Store to protect relevant markets such as online general search in contravention of Section 4(2)(e) of the Competition Act 2002".
 In June 2019, CCI issued letters to handset makers seeking details of terms and conditions of their agreement with Google. This is to ascertain if Google imposed any restrictions on them for using the company's apps in the past 8 years from 2011.
 In December 2021, CCI took a step back from approving Amazon's investment in a Future Group company, which had initially received its nod in November 2019. Amazon has been blamed for concealing the scope and complete information of its investment while seeking for the approval.
 On December 31, 2021, CCI ordered an investigation into Apple Inc. business practices, including the company's enforcement of a proprietary payment system, to be conducted within 60 days.
 In October 2022, CCI imposed a  penalty on Google for abusing its dominance in the licensing of Android OS for smartphones, app store market for Android, general web search services, non-OS specific mobile web browsers and online video hosting platforms in India. A week later, CCI levied a separate  penalty for abusing its Play Store policies. Additionally, it issued a cease-and-desist order directing Google to modify its policies, including allowing mobile application developers to use third-party payment services on its app store.

 Ntụaka 
.mw-parser-output .reflist{font-size:90%;margin-bottom:0.5em;list-style-type:decimal}.mw-parser-output .reflist .references{font-size:100%;margin-bottom:0;list-style-type:inherit}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns-2{column-width:30em}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns-3{column-width:25em}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns{margin-top:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns ol{margin-top:0}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns li{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .reflist-upper-alpha{list-style-type:upper-alpha}.mw-parser-output .reflist-upper-roman{list-style-type:upper-roman}.mw-parser-output .reflist-lower-alpha{list-style-type:lower-alpha}.mw-parser-output .reflist-lower-greek{list-style-type:lower-greek}.mw-parser-output .reflist-lower-roman{list-style-type:lower-roman}body.skin-minerva .mw-parser-output .reflist{column-gap:2em}

 Njikọ mpụga 

 Official website  Competition Commission of India
 The Competition Act, 2002 – Bare Act
 Overview of Competition Law