Cin zarafin Savannah Dietrich

A watan Agustan shekara ta 2011, wata daliba ta makarantar sakandare ta Amurka mai suna Savannah Dietrich ta yi mata fyade da Will Frey da Austin Zehnder, 'yan wasan lacrosse daga Trinity High School, makarantar sakandare ce ta Katolika a Louisville, Kentucky. Frey da Zehnder da sauran masu kallo ne suka dauki hotunan harin, kuma hotuna da tsokaci daga abin da ya faru sun bazu a intanet.

A cikin yarjejeniyar neman gafara, yara maza biyu masu shekaru 16 Frey da Zehnder sun yi ikirarin aikata laifuka a matakin farko, laifi, da voyeurism, laifi. Dietrich ta saki sunayen wadanda suka kai mata hari kuma ta yi jayayya a fili cewa ba a hukunta su yadda ya kamata ba duk da cewa alƙalin da ke jagoranta ya umurce su da kada su tattauna batun. Rikici na kasa da kasa game da shari'ar ya samo asali ne lokacin da lauyoyi ga yara maza suka yi ƙoƙari su raina ta, amma daga baya aka watsar da motsi.

Bayan haka, a lokacin da aka yanke masa hukunci, alƙalin ya ce saboda "babban yanayin" laifin, za ta sake duba hukuncin da mai gabatar da kara ya nema. Dangane da haka, alƙalin ya cire wani tanadi wanda zai share bayanan wadanda ake tuhuma lokacin da suka kai shekaru 19 + 1⁄2, kuma ya ba da umarnin cewa a yi wa aikin al'umma hidima a wani sadaka wanda ke hulɗa da batutuwan mata. 

 Shari'ar kotu ta farko, yarjejeniyar neman gafara, da dokar sirri 
Wadanda ake tuhuma biyu sun yi ikirarin aikata laifuka a matakin farko, laifi da voyeurism, laifi ne.Pesta, Abigail (2013-06-04). "Fighting Back: One Girl's Mission to End Cyberbullying". Cosmopolitan.com. Archived from the original on 2016-06-10. Retrieved 2016-05-19. Yarjejeniyar farko da mai gabatar da kara ya amince da ita ita ce sa'o'i 50 na hidimar al'umma, yarjejeniyar karkatarwa, shawarwari, da kuma tanadi don share bayanan masu laifi - idan sun ci gaba da halin kirki - a shekaru 19 + 1⁄2. Paul Richwalsky, mai gabatar da kara a cikin shari'ar ya kammala karatu kuma ya inganta Makarantar Sakandare ta Trinity, makarantar da yaran suka halarta. 

A ranar 26 ga Yuni, 2012, Alkalin Deana H. McDonald ya gargadi bangarorin game da shari'ar cewa dole ne su bi dokoki da dokoki game da sirri da sirrin ayyukan yara a kan Commonwealth na Kentucky .  Jihar Kentucky tana ɗaya daga cikin jihohi 11 waɗanda ke rufe shari'o'in kotu idan wanda ake tuhuma bai kai shekara 18 ba. Sa'an nan Alkalin McDonald ya ɗauki ƙarin mataki, yana nuna cewa bai kamata a tattauna laifin da kansa ba kuma babu wanda ya kamata ya "yi magana game da lamarin ga kowa saboda kowane dalili", in ji ta, a cewar fayilolin kotu. "Babu wanda zai yi magana ko rubuta wani abu. "  Wannan yana nufin cewa Dietrich (matar da aka azabtar mai shekaru 16) ba a yarda ya yi magana game da shari'ar ba, tuhumar, gaskiyar da zarge-zarge a ciki, da kuma asalin wadanda ake tuhuma. Pesta, Abigail (2013-06-04). "Fighting Back: One Girl's Mission to End Cyberbullying". Cosmopolitan.com. Archived from the original on 2016-06-10. Retrieved 2016-05-19.

 Magana daga wanda aka azabtar yana nuna rashin tausayi 
Dietrich ta bayyana cewa ta ji cewa ba a magance damuwarta yadda ya kamata ba kuma yarjejeniyar da aka gabatar ta yi sauƙi. Daga baya a wannan maraice, ta sanar da sunayen wadanda ake tuhuma a kan Twitter, ta wallafa "Will Frey da Austin Zehnder sun yi min rauni," da kuma "Ku tafi, kulle ni. Ba na kare kowa da ya sanya rayuwata jahannama mai rai".Pesta, Abigail (2013-06-04). "Fighting Back: One Girl's Mission to End Cyberbullying". Cosmopolitan.com. Archived from the original on 2016-06-10. Retrieved 2016-05-19.

Alkalin farko a kan shari'ar, Angela McCormick Bisig, ya tafi ranar da Alkalin McDonald ya ba da umarnin shiru mai rikitarwa. A cikin 2013 Alkalin Bisig, a lokacin alƙali ne na kotun da'ira, ya ci gaba da yin rikodin ya yarda da Dietrich ya kamata a ba da damar tattauna laifin da kansa, "Ba za mu iya gaya wa matashi wanda aka aikata laifuka cewa ba za su iya ba da labarin kansu ba".Pesta, Abigail (2013-06-04). "Fighting Back: One Girl's Mission to End Cyberbullying". Cosmopolitan.com. Archived from the original on 2016-06-10. Retrieved 2016-05-19.

Lauyoyi ga yara maza sun yi ƙoƙari su yi watsi da Dietrich don buga sunayensu, amma daga baya aka watsar da motsi.[1] Duk da gargadi na Alkalin McDonald wanda ya hana kowa "yi magana ko rubuta wani abu", a ranar 28 ga watan Agusta, 2012, Alkalin Bisig ya bayyana a cikin hukunce-hukuncensa cewa a ranar 30 ga watan Yulin 2012 "Alkalin McDonald ya yanke hukuncin cewa babu "tsarin aure" a wurin kuma cewa gargadi ta ya kasance ya bi dokar sirri da Dokokin Kentucky ke bukata" [1]￼

 Hukunce-hukunceA cikin wata shaida, Dietrich ta kuma bayyana cewa Paul Richwalsky, babban mai gabatar da kara a cikin kotun yara, ya ce ya kamata ta "sake ya wuce shi kuma ta ga mai warkarwa. ... Kurkukun ya kasance na 'gaskiya' masu fyade, masu kisan kai da 'yan fashi".[1] Richwalsky ta musanta zargin kuma ta bayyana a cikin wata shaida "Wataƙila ba ta da yawa tana ƙoƙarin yaudarar wannan kotun da gangan, amma a maimakon haka maganganun da aka yi a cikin sanarwar ta kawai sakamakon abin da za ta so ta yi imani da shi ya faru kuma ba abin da ya faru ba".[1] da sake fasalin yarjejeniyar neman gafara 
A lokacin da aka yanke masa hukunci, Alkalin Angela Bisig ya jaddada "babban yanayin" laifin. Ta cire wani tanadi na yarjejeniyar neman gafara wanda zai share bayanan wadanda ake tuhuma lokacin da suka kai shekaru 19+1⁄2. Ta kuma ba da umarnin cewa a yi wa aikin al'umma hidima a wani sadaka wanda ke hulɗa da batutuwan mata. 

Sharuɗɗan hukuncin suna buƙatar sa ido daga sashen shari'ar yara na jihar, maganin masu laifi da kuma aikin sa'o'i 50 na sabis na al'umma a wurin mata. Bayan shekaru uku na halin kirki ana iya yin gyare-gyare ga tuhume-tuhume guda biyu zuwa ƙananan laifuka kuma bayan shekaru biyar yaran na iya neman a share hukuncin.

 Ayyuka na gaba 
An ruwaito cewa Dietrich ya gamsu da hukuncin da aka sake fasalinsa. A watan Maris na shekara ta 2013, ta taka muhimmiyar rawa da kuma jama'a wajen ba da shawara kan doka a majalisar dokokin Kentucky, kamar yadda The Courier-Journal ya ruwaito: [S]yana fatan cewa doka za ta hana abin da ya faru da ita daga faruwa ga kowa. Ta ce watakila doka za ta bayyana wa kowa cewa haƙƙin wanda aka azabtar ne ya yi magana game da abin da ya faru.A lokaci guda, Dietrich ta nuna cewa irin wannan dokar jihar ba ta da mahimmanci, saboda kariya da ta yi imanin an riga an ba ta Kwaskwarimar Farko ga Kundin Tsarin Mulki na Amurka.  Masanin Kwaskwarimar Farko Eugene Volokh ya yi sharhi game da wannan shari'ar Louisville, yana mai cewa wata doka mai mahimmanci ta Kotun Koli ta Amurka akan wannan batun ita ce Oklahoma Publishing v. Kotun Gundumar, 430 US 308 (1977) . "Dokar da ke hana wanda aka azabtar ya bayyana sunayen wadanda suka kai mata hari, ina tsammanin, a bayyane ba daidai ba ne, koda kuwa masu kai hare-hare matasa ne. Oklahoma Publishing Co. v. Kotun Gundumar (1977) ta ki amincewa da ra'ayin cewa kotuna ko majalisun dokoki na iya hana buga sunayen masu laifi na matasa; wannan shari'ar ta shafi buga sunan mai laifi, wanda ta koya daga sauraron kotu, amma hujja ta shafi akalla yadda ta shafi sunan da ta koya daga kanta. "

 Manazarta 
Rukuni:Shafuka masu fassarorin da ba'a duba ba