Duniya da ba za a iya zama ba

"The Uninhabitable Earth" wani labarin ne na ɗan jaridar Amurka David Wallace-Wells wanda aka buga a cikin 10 ga Yuli, 2017, fitowar mujallar New York . Labarin mai tsawo ya nuna mummunan yanayin abin da zai iya faruwa a nan gaba saboda dumamar yanayi. Labarin shine labarin da aka fi karantawa a tarihin mujallar.

Labarin ya zama wahayi ga The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming, wani littafi mai tsawo game da ra'ayoyin da aka bincika a cikin asalin rubutun.

 Abun ciki 
Labarin ya fara da gargadi:[Gwargwadon duniya] shine, na yi alkawari, mafi muni fiye da yadda kuke tsammani. Idan damuwar ku game da dumamar yanayi ta mamaye tsoron hauhawar matakin teku, kuna da kyar karkatar da abin da tsoro zai yiwu, har ma a cikin rayuwar matashi a yau. Kuma duk da haka teku masu kumbura - da biranen da za su nitse - sun mamaye hoton dumamar duniya, kuma sun mamaye ikonmu na firgici na yanayi, cewa sun rufe fahimtarmu game da wasu barazanar, da yawa kusa da hannu. Rashin teku yana da mummunar gaske, a zahiri yana da mummuna sosai; amma guduwa daga bakin teku ba zai isa ba.Labarin ya binciki mummunar tasirin canjin yanayi. Rashin yanayin zafi na iya sa wasu sassan Duniya ba za a iya zama ba, musamman a yankuna masu zafi inda zafi da zafi zasu iya zama masu kisa. Rashin sanyi na Arctic na iya fitar da adadi mai yawa na carbon da methane, yana hanzarta dumamar duniya. Tekuna masu tasowa suna barazanar ambaliyar biranen bakin teku da kuma fitar da miliyoyin mutane. Canjin yanayi na iya rage yawan amfanin gona, wanda ke haifar da karancin abinci. Karin yanayin zafi da sauye-sauyen yanayin halittu na iya haifar da yaduwar cututtuka da matsalolin kiwon lafiya. Sakamakon tattalin arziki na canjin yanayi na iya zama mai tsanani, tare da asarar GDP da karuwar talauci. Canjin yanayi na iya kara rikice-rikice da kuma tilasta ƙaura mai yawa yayin da mutane ke guduwa daga wuraren da ba a zaune ba. Tekuna suna shan ƙarin carbon dioxide, wanda ke haifar da ƙarancin ruwa wanda ke barazana ga rayuwar ruwa. Labarin ya jaddada gaggawa na daukar mataki mai tsanani don rage waɗannan tasirin da kuma hana yanayin mafi munin ya zama gaskiya.

 Janar 
A ranar 20 ga Nuwamba, 2017, Cibiyar Jarida ta Arthur L. Carter ta NYU ta dauki bakuncin tattaunawa ta tsawon sa'o'i biyu tsakanin Wallace-Wells da Michael E. Mann don tattauna gardamar game da labarin.

Tare da labarin akwai jerin tambayoyin da aka yi da masana kimiyya. Wadannan sun hada da masanin burbushin halittu Peter Ward,  masanin yanayin yanayi Michael E. Mann,  masanin ilimin teku Wallace Smith Broecker,  masanin yanayin zafi James Hansen,  da masanin kimiyya Michael Oppenheimer.  Bugu da kari, an buga wani labari na labarin a kan layi wanda ya haɗa da bayanan rubutu.

A watan Fabrairun 2019, Wallace-Wells ya buga The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming .  An cire littafin a cikin The Guardian . 

 Karɓar baƙi 
Labarin ya sami zargi nan da nan daga al'ummar canjin yanayi tare da bangarori biyu: ɓangaren yana da mummunan ra'ayi, kuma yana ƙunshe da wasu kurakurai na gaskiya. Kungiyar da ba ta gwamnati ba Climate Feedback ta taƙaita sake dubawa daga masana kimiyya masu yawa kamar haka:Masu bita sun gano cewa wasu maganganu a cikin wannan labarin mai rikitarwa sun yi kuskuren bincike a kan batun, kuma wasu ba su da mahallin da ya dace don mai karatu ya fahimta a sarari. Sauran bayani da yawa a cikin labarin daidai ne, amma masu karatu suna iya barin ƙarshen gaba ɗaya wanda ya wuce gona da iri idan aka kwatanta da fahimtarmu mafi kyau ta kimiyya.Jason Samenow ya kira shi "ƙananan yanayi" saboda Wallace-Wells ya gabatar da wasu daga cikin mafi munin yanayi ba tare da yarda cewa suna da yiwuwar "daga nesa" ba, kuma ba tare da bincika sakamakon da ya fi dacewa ba, wanda har yanzu yana da tsanani sosai. Tare da ambaton kurakurai na gaskiya, Michael Mann da wasu da yawa musamman sun soki bayanin fitar da hayaki na Arctic. A cikin tattaunawarsa da Mann a NYU, Wallace-Wells ya lura cewa ba zai haɗa da maganganu game da sakin methane ba idan ya sake rubuta wannan yanki.

Wasu 'yan jarida sun kare kimiyya, suna cewa galibi daidai ne. Kevin Drum ya ce: "Ban ga wata shaida mai kyau ba don manyan kuskuren gaskiya. " Kevin Drum (July 10, 2017). "Our Approach to Climate Change Isn't Working. Let's Try Something Else". Mother Jones. Retrieved September 15, 2024. Emily Atkin ta ce: "Kararru game da kimiyya a cikin labarin Wallace-Wells galibi rikice-rikice ne. "  Robinson Meyer na The Atlantic ya kira shi "wani abu mai mahimmanci da kuma mummunar kwatanci game da abin da zafin duniya zai yi wa duniya. "  Susan Matthews, a rubuce a cikin Slate, ta ce "Yankin kwayar cuta nan take na iya zama Silent Spring na zamaninmu". Babban zargi shi ne cewa David Wallace-Wells yana ƙoƙarin tsoratar da mutane. Daga nan ne 'yan jarida da masu sharhi suka binciki wannan taken, tare da wasu suna cewa sun yi tunanin tsoro ya zama dole, saboda gaskiyar matsalar, yayin da wasu suka yi tunanin cewa tsoratar da mutane ba ta da amfani. Misali, Eric Holthaus ya ce "tsoron shit daga [mutane] wata babbar dabarar ce" don sa su so su magance canjin yanayi.

A cikin wata hira da ta biyo baya, Wallace-Wells ya ce "ba ta da kyau a gare ni cewa akwai karin haɗari a tsoratar da mutane fiye da yadda ba ta tsoratar su ba ... jinina ya kasance, kuma, idan akwai kashi ɗaya cikin dari na damar cewa mun fara wani sarkar da za ta iya kawo ƙarshen tseren ɗan adam, to hakan ya kamata ya zama wani abu da jama'a suka sani kuma suna tunani game da shi.

 Manazarta 

Rukuni:Shafuka masu fassarorin da ba'a duba ba