Ash v. Childs Dining Hall Co.

Ash v. Childs Dining Hall Co. shari'ar laifi ce da Kotun daukaka kara ta New York ta yanke hukunci a shekarar 1918, sananne ne don tsara gwajin "tsinkaye mai ma'ana" da aka yi amfani da shi a cikin irin wannan ikirarin shari'a game da abubuwa na kasashen waje a cikin abinci.

Shari'ar ta shafi Flora Ash, wanda ya ji rauni ta hanyar ƙaramin ƙarfe (ƙusa) da aka ɓoye a cikin wani blueberry pie da aka yi amfani da shi a gidan cin abinci na wanda ake tuhuma. Kotun ta ki amfani da koyarwar res ipsa loquitur  (abin yana magana da kansa) saboda rashin isasshen shaida kai tsaye na sakaci daga Kamfanin Childs Dining Hall. Ba tare da irin wannan hujja ba, ba a sami wanda ake tuhuma da alhakin ba. Duk da cewa tack wani abu ne wanda mabukaci ba zai yi tsammani ba, ba a dauki wanda ake tuhuma ba tare da tabbacin kuskure ba. Kuma Wannan hukuncin ya jaddada cewa alhakin yana buƙatar wani abu mai cutarwa ba zato ba tsammani da kuma shaidar sakaci, yana tasiri ga yadda aka kimanta irin waɗannan laifuka a nan gaba.

 Dubi kuma 

 Aboki v. Childs Dining Hall Co.

 Manazarta