Takardun Sashin Binciken Yanayi

An sace Takardun Sashin Binciken Yanayi ciki har da dubban imel da sauran fayilolin kwamfuta daga uwar garken a Sashin Bindon Yanayi na Jami'ar Gabashin Anglia a cikin wani abin da ya faru a watan Nuwamba 2009. An sake rarraba takardun da farko ta hanyar shafukan yanar gizo da yawa na masu musanta dumamar yanayi, waɗanda suka yi zargin cewa takardun sun nuna mummunar hali ta manyan masana kimiyya na yanayi. Jerin bincike sun ki amincewa da waɗannan zarge-zargen, yayin da suke kammala cewa ya kamata masana kimiyya na CRU su kasance masu budewa tare da rarraba bayanai da hanyoyin da ake buƙata. Kwamitoci shida ne suka binciki zarge-zargen kuma suka buga rahotanni, ba su sami wata shaida ta zamba ko mummunar hali ta kimiyya ba. Yarjejeniyar kimiyya cewa dumamar duniya tana faruwa ne sakamakon Ayyukan ɗan adam bai canza ba a ƙarshen binciken.Biello, David (Feb., 2010). "Negating 'Climategate'". Scientific American. (302):2. 16. . "In fact, nothing in the stolen material undermines the scientific consensus that climate change is happening and that humans are to blame"; See also: Lubchenco, Jane (2 December 2009) House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (House Select Committee). "The Administration's View on the State of Climate Science". House Hearing, 111 Congress. U.S. Government Printing Office. "the e-mails really do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus and the independent scientific analyses of thousands of scientists around the world that tell us that the Earth is warming and that the warming is largely a result of human activities." As quoted in the report published by Office of Inspector General.

Lamarin ya faru ne jim kadan kafin bude taron koli na duniya na Copenhagen a watan Disamba na shekara ta 2009. Ya haifar da tattaunawa ta gaba ɗaya game da haɓaka buɗewar bayanan kimiyya (ko da yake yawancin bayanan yanayi koyaushe suna samuwa kyauta). Masana kimiyya, kungiyoyin kimiyya, da jami'an gwamnati sun bayyana cewa lamarin bai shafi yanayin kimiyya gaba ɗaya don canjin yanayi ba. Andrew Revkin ya ruwaito a cikin The New York Times cewa "Shaidar da ke nuna karuwar gudummawar ɗan adam ga dumamar yanayi ta duniya an yarda da ita sosai har kayan da aka sace ba zai iya lalata gardamar gaba ɗaya ba".

 Abubuwan da ke cikin takardun 
Abubuwan sun kunshi fiye da 1,000 e-mail, 2,000 takardu, da kuma yin sharhi game da lambar tushe, game da Binciken canjin yanayi wanda ya shafi wani lokaci daga 1996 har zuwa 2009. Wasu daga cikin imel ɗin da aka yada a ko'ina sun haɗa da tattaunawa game da yadda za a magance muhawarar masu shakka game da canjin yanayi, maganganu marasa kyau game da masu shakka, tambayoyi daga 'yan jarida, da kuma rubutun takardun kimiyya. An yi ikirarin cewa waɗannan tattaunawar sun nuna ƙoƙarin rufe masu adawa da ra'ayoyinsu,  kuma sun haɗa da tattaunawa game da lalata fayiloli don hana su bayyana su a ƙarƙashin Dokar 'Yancin Bayanai ta Burtaniya ta 2000.  Binciken da kamfanin dillancin labarai na Associated Press ya yi game da dukkan imel ɗin ya gano cewa ba su goyi bayan da'awar karya kimiyya ba, amma sun nuna rashin girmamawa ga masu sukar. Masana kimiyya sun tattauna game da guje wa raba bayanai tare da masu sukar, amma takardun ba su nuna wata shaida cewa an lalata kowane bayani ba. Masu bincike sun kuma tattauna a cikin imel yadda masu sukar suka yi amfani da bayanan da suka saki a kan buƙata don yin hare-hare kan masu bincike. A wata hira da The Guardian, Phil Jones ya ce "Wasu daga cikin imel ɗin da ba a zaɓa ba kuma an aika su cikin zafi na lokacin, lokacin da na yi takaici. Na yi nadamar aika wasu daga cikinsu. Ba mu share wani imel ko bayanai a nan a CRU ba. "Ya tabbatar da cewa imel ɗin da ya haifar da mafi yawan gardama ya zama gaskiya. 

Yawancin imel ɗin sun shafi fannoni na fasaha da na duniya na binciken yanayi, kamar nazarin bayanai da cikakkun bayanai game da taron kimiyya. Rashin jituwa ya mayar da hankali kan ƙananan imel, musamman waɗanda aka aika zuwa ko daga masanan yanayin yanayi Phil Jones, shugaban CRU, da Michael E. Mann na Jami'ar Jihar Pennsylvania (PSU), ɗaya daga cikin masu kirkirar jadawalin yanayin zafin jiki da ake kira " jadawalin hockey stick".

Masu musanta canjin yanayi sun sami tallace-tallace mai yawa game da zargin cewa imel ɗin da aka ɓoye sun nuna masana kimiyya na yanayi sun haɗa kai wajen sarrafa bayanai,  sun ɓoye bayanan kimiyya,  kuma sun yi ƙoƙari su hana buga takardun kimiyya masu adawa a cikin mujallu masu bita. Masana kimiyya da masu binciken canjin yanayi sun ce babu wani abu a cikin imel da ya tabbatar da rashin laifi, kuma sun watsar da zarge-zargen. Rahotanni masu zaman kansu sun ce imel ɗin ba su shafi shaidar cewa mutum ya sa dumamar duniya babbar barazana ce, kuma ana nuna imel ɗin da ba daidai ba don tallafawa da'awar rashin gaskiya na halayyar kimiyya, amma akwai shawarwari masu tayar da hankali cewa masana kimiyya sun guji raba bayanan kimiyya tare da masu sukar.

Ofishin Kwamishinan Bayanai ya bayyana cewa "shaidar da ta fi dacewa daga imel ɗin da aka buga ta nuna ƙoƙari na kayar da bayyanar ta hanyar share bayanai. Yana da wahala a yi tunanin ƙarin shaidar da ta shafi na farko. ... Gaskiyar cewa ana iya samun abubuwan da ke cikin [FOIA] sashi na 77 a nan, amma ba za a iya yin aiki ba saboda lokacin da ya wuce, lamari ne mai tsanani sosai".  Kwamitin Kimiyya da Fasaha ya soki ICO don "bayar da ya wuce don yin cikakken bayani da ya wuce", kuma ya kira shi don tabbatar da cikakken buƙatun da Bayani na 'Yanci don tabbatar da cikakkiyar Bayani".

 Manazarta 
Rukuni:Shafuka masu fassarorin da ba'a duba ba