Lliuya da RWE AG

Lliuya da RWE AG (2015) Shari'a No. 2 O 285/15 (Essen Oberlandesgericht)  doka ce ta cin zarafin Jamus da shari'ar Shari'ar yanayi da  [de] ya fara, game da alhakin Lalacewar yanayi a Peru daga kankara mai narkewa, a kan babbar kamfanin wutar lantarki na Jamus, RWE, wanda ya haifar da kusan 0.47% na duk hayakin gas mai gurɓataccen tarihi. Idan ya ci nasara, zai kafa misali na doka cewa kamfanonin da ke ba da gudummawa ga canjin yanayi suna da alhakin lalacewar da suka haifar. An daukaka kara a Kotun Koli ta Yankin a Hamm, Arewacin Rhine-Westphalia . A ranar 28 ga Mayu 2025, kotun ta ki amincewa da karar Lucino.

 Gaskiya 
, a Peruvian farmer from Huaraz, population 120,000, claimed against RWE, Germany's largest electric company, that it knowingly contributed to climate damage by emitting greenhouse gases, and was partly responsible for melting mountain glaciers near his town. This caused Palcacocha, a nearby glacial lake, to increase in size since 1975, creating a major flood risk to the town. If a large avalanche were to fall into the lake, the resulting wave would reach 70 feet over the top of the moraine, and the flood of nearly 2 million cubic meters of water would reach Huaraz within an hour. The emissions were a nuisance under the German Civil Code, BGB §1004, and RWE is requested should reimburse a portion of costs incurred to establish flood protection, namely 0.47% of total cost, given RWE's annual contribution to GHG emissions. Specifically, as the flood protection project would cost 4 million USD, RWE is requested to pay $20,000.

 Shari'a 

 Kotun Jiha 
Kotun Essen Landesgericht ta yi watsi da ikirarin Lliuya na umarni da lalacewa. Ya bayyana cewa ba zai iya samar da ingantaccen gyare-gyare ba, saboda halin da ake ciki na Lliuya zai kasance iri ɗaya ko da RWE ta daina watsawa kuma babu 'sashin layi' a cikin alaƙar da ke tattare da ita tsakanin wasu hayaki da tasirin canjin yanayi. RWE ba 'rashin jituwa ta hanyar hali' ba ne a karkashin BGB §1004, kuma an ba da yawan masu ba da gudummawa ga canjin yanayi, danganta lalacewar mutum ga takamaiman 'yan wasan ba zai yiwu ba.

 Kotun Jiha ta Sama 
Kotun Oberlandesgericht Hamm, a ranar 30 ga Nuwamba , ta ce da'awar ta dace. Zai tafi matakin shaida game da ko gidan Lliuya yana fuskantar barazanar ambaliyar ruwa ko laka (b) yadda RWE ta ba da gudummawa. Zai sake duba ra'ayi na kwararru game da hayakin RWE CO, gudummawa da tasiri a kan kankara.

A ranar 17 ga Maris 2025 an sake dawo da karar a Kotun Koli ta Yankin a Hamm, Arewacin Rhine-Westphalia .  Shari'ar ta yanke shawarar wane shaidar za ta dace a cikin shari'ar karshe, wanda zai yanke hukunci kan ko RWE - wanda bai taba aiki a Peru ba - za a iya ɗaukar alhakin lalacewa. RWE ta ci gaba da musanta alhakin shari'a, tana jayayya cewa canjin yanayi lamari ne na duniya wanda masu ba da gudummawa da yawa suka haifar.

A ranar 28 ga Mayu 2025, kotun ta ki amincewa da karar Lucino.Buschschlüter, Vanessa (28 May 2025). "German court rejects Peruvian farmer's landmark climate case". BBC News. Retrieved 29 May 2025.

 Ma'anar 
Wannan shi ne shari'ar farko da za ta iya riƙe kamfanonin man fetur na burbushin halittu kai tsaye da alhakin lalacewar da suka yi da gangan ta hanyar sakin iskar gas da samun riba. Idan Lliuya ya ci nasara a cikin dokar Jamus, ka'idar za ta shafi duk sauran kamfanonin da ke da alhakin sakin iskar gas da lalacewar da suka haifar, kuma ana iya amfani da su ta irin wannan hanyoyi a cikin dokokin cin zarafin ƙasashe 

 Dubi kuma 

 Dokar Tarayyar Turai
 Gidauniyar Urgenda da Jihar Netherlands (20 Disamba 2019), aikin jihar don rage hayaki daidai da Yarjejeniyar Paris da haƙƙin rayuwa
 Neubauer da Jamus (24 Maris 2021), 1 BvR 2656/18, aikin da aka yi wa jihar don rage hayakin carbon da sauri fiye da yadda gwamnati ke buƙata a cikin Dokar don kare haƙƙin rayuwa da muhalli
 Smith v Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd (2021), NZCA 552 haraji na kamfanonin mai da wutar lantarki a cikin laifi don biyan lalacewar yanayi
 Milieudefensie v Royal Dutch Shell (26 ga Mayu 2021), aikin kamfanin mai a cikin laifi don rage hayaki daidai da Yarjejeniyar Paris da haƙƙin rayuwa
 McGaughey da Davies v USS Ltd (2022), EWHC 1233 (Ch), ayyukan daraktoci don tsara fitar da man fetur a cikin hasken Yarjejeniyar Paris da haƙƙin rayuwa

 Manazarta