Hakin iyali

Haƙƙin iyali"Introduction: Taking Child and Family Rights Seriously: Family Engagement and Its Evidence in Child Welfare"   ko haƙƙin rayuwar iyali haƙƙin kowane mutum ne don a mutunta rayuwar iyali da aka kafa, da farawa, sanann da kuma kula da iyali. An amince da wannan haƙƙin a cikin nau'o'in haƙƙin ɗan adam na duniya daban-daban, ciki har da Mataki na 16 na Yarjejeniyar Haƙƙin Bil Adama ta Duniya, Mataki na 23 na Yarjejeniyar Ƙasa ta Duniya kan 'Yancin Bil'adama da Siyasa, da Mataki na 8 na Yarjejeniyar Turai kan 'Yancin Dan Adam.
Ma'anarsa
Canjin ra'ayi na iyali yana buƙatar ma'anar abin da iyali ya kunsa. Babu wata hamayya cewa dangantakar dake tsakanin mata da miji, Cvetic, Goran (1987). "Immigration Cases in Strasbourg: The Right to Family Life Under Article 8 of the European Convention". International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 36 (3): 650. doi:10.1093/iclqaj/36.3.647.abokan aure (de facto),  Johnston v Ireland (9697/82) ECHR 18 December 1986 iyaye da yara,  'yan'uwa, Olsson v Sweden (10465/83) ECHR 24 Marc da 'yan uwa na kusa' kamar tsakanin kakanni da jikoki[6] suna wakiltar dangi kamar yadda ake bukata a ƙarƙashin haƙƙin rayuwar iyali. Kalubale ya kasance inda tsarin zamantakewar iyali na zamani ya samo asali wanda har yanzu doka ba ta fahimce ta ba. “Kasuwar rayuwar iyali tambaya ce ta gaskiya” kuma an yanke hukunci bisa ga kowane yanayi na zahiri.] Kotun Turai ta kare hakkin bil'adama ta bayyana cewa idan aka yi la'akari da abin da ya ƙunshi dangantakar iyali "Dole ne kotun ta yi la'akari da abubuwan da ke faruwa a cikin al'umma da kuma sauye-sauyen ra'ayi na zamantakewa, zamantakewa da al'amurran da suka shafi dangantaka, ciki har da cewa ba kawai hanya ɗaya ko zabi ɗaya ba a fagen jagoranci da rayuwa ta iyali ko rayuwar sirri" ECHR ta fara gane cewa dangantakar jinsi ɗaya tana ƙarƙashin haƙƙin rayuwar iyali a cikin 2010 Schalk da Kopf v. Austria. Za a iya karya dangantakar dangi.
Dangantaka da hakkin yin aure

Membobi da ma'aikatan Majalisar Birni na Minneapolis sun yi tattaki a faretin Twin Cities Pride na 2012.
Haƙƙin yin aure yana da alaƙa da haƙƙin rayuwar iyali, amma haƙƙoƙin biyu ba ɗaya ba ne. An tanadar da haƙƙin yin aure a sarari a cikin duk kayan haƙƙin ɗan adam, Y & Z v United Kingdom (GC) 22 April 1997 da gaske yana ba da cewa duk mutane suna da 'yancin yin aure kuma su sami iyali. Haƙƙin rayuwar iyali galibi yana nufin haƙƙin mutum don ƙirƙira da kula da dangantakar danginsu. An fayyace a cikin X, Y da Z v United Kingdom cewa a halin da ake ciki inda aka kori ma’aurata daga jihar abokin zamansu saboda asalin kasarsu, babu wani tauye hakkin yin aure kamar yadda daidaikun mutane suka rigaya sun yi aure, don haka dole ne a yi la’akari da hakkin rayuwar iyali[European Convention on Human Rights, Article 12; American Convention on Human Rights, Article 17; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 23(1); African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights, Article 18; Universal Declaration on Human Rights, Article 16; European Social Charter, Article 16; International Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Article 10.
Manazarta