Buƙatun 'Yancin Bayani ga Sashin Binciken Yanayi

Buƙatun 'Yancin Bayani ga Sashin Binciken Yanayi da aka nuna a cikin tattaunawar manema labarai game da cece-kuce game da samun damar bayanai daga bayanan zafin kayan aiki, musamman a lokacin rikicin imel ɗin Sashin Binciken Yanayi wanda ya fara a watan Nuwamba 2009.

Dokar 'Yancin Bayanai ta Burtaniya (FOIA) ta fara aiki a cikin 2005, kuma an gabatar da buƙatun FOI ga Sashin Bincike na Yanayi (CRU) a Jami'ar Gabashin Anglia (UEA) don cikakkun bayanai daga tashoshin yanayi da aka yi amfani da su wajen haɓaka bayanan rikodin yanayin zafin kayan aiki, don kwafin yarjejeniyoyin da aka samu albarkatun ƙasa daga cibiyoyi na yanayi, da kuma game da canjin saƙon imel na gwamnati. Rahoton.

A lokuta da yawa, danyen bayanan da CRU ya samu daga Ƙungiyoyin Yanayi na Kasa yana fuskantar takunkumi kan sake rarrabawa: a ranar 12 ga Agusta 2009 CRU ta sanar da cewa suna neman izinin yin watsi da wadannan hane-hane, kuma a ranar 24 ga Nuwamba 2009 jami'ar ta bayyana cewa sama da kashi 95% na bayanan yanayi na CRU sun riga sun kasance shekaru da yawa, tare da sauran za a sake su yayin da aka ba da izini. A cikin shawarar da aka sanar a ranar 27 ga Yuli, 2011 Ofishin Kwamishinan Watsa Labarai (ICO) ya bukaci fitar da danyen bayanai duk da cewa ba a samu izini ba ko kuma a wani misali aka ki, kuma a ranar 27 ga Yuli, 2011 CRU ta sanar da fitar da albarkatun kayan aikin da ba a riga a cikin jama'a ba, ban da Poland wanda ke wajen yankin da bukatar FOIA ta rufe.

Wata bukata ta FOI ta shekara ta 2008 da David Holland ta yi na imel da ke tattaunawa kan aiki a kan Rahoton Bincike na Hudu na IPCC jami'a ta ƙi. A cikin Nuwamba 2009 ya yi zargin cewa imel na CRU da aka buga a kan layi sun tattauna batun share imel ɗin da ya nema: a cikin Janairu 2010 Mataimakin Kwamishinan Watsa Labarai ya gaya wa wani ɗan jarida cewa wannan yana nuna wani laifi a ƙarƙashin sashe na 77 na FOIA, amma an hana gabatar da kara ta hanyar ka'ida. Jaridu sun yi kuskuren bayyana hakan a matsayin yanke shawara dangane da danyen bayanai, kuma an tattauna batun ne da kwamitin binciken kwamitin kimiya da fasaha na majalisar dokokin kasar ya tattauna kan lamarin, inda ya gano cewa babu wata matsala. Shawarar ICO da aka buga a ranar 7 ga Yuli 2010 ta bayyana cewa ba a bincika wannan laifin mai yuwuwa ba saboda an hana shi lokaci. Kamar yadda Holland ya gamsu da kada ya ci gaba da korafinsa game da jami'ar, ba a buƙatar wani mataki na gaba ba, amma ICO za ta "yi la'akari da ko ƙarin mataki ya dace don tabbatar da yarda a nan gaba."

A cikin Satumba 2011 ICO ta ba da sabon jagora ga jami'o'i. Wannan ya bayyana keɓancewa da keɓancewa don kare bincike, gami da ba da izini don musayar ra'ayi na cikin gida tsakanin masana ilimi da masu bincike ba tare da bin diddigin waje ba, da kuma yaba wa bayyana bayanai a hankali lokacin da yake cikin maslahar jama'a.

Buƙatun FOIA don ɗanyen bayanan yanayi

Daga 1978 zuwa gaba, Sashin Binciken Yanayi ya haɓaka tsarin bayanan CRUTEM ɗin sa na yanayin yanayin zafin ƙasa zuwa 1850, dangane da bayanan zafin kayan aikin da Kungiyoyin Yanayi na ƙasa ke riƙe a duniya, galibi ƙarƙashin yarjejeniyar sirri na yau da kullun ko na yau da kullun waɗanda ke hana amfani da wannan danyen bayanan zuwa dalilai na ilimi. Tun daga 1991, Phil Jones na CRU ya tattauna bayanai tare da Warwick Hughes (daga baya na Ƙungiyar Kimiyyar Yanayi ta New Zealand). Daga 2002 zuwa gaba, Jones ya karɓi buƙatun daga Stephen McIntyre don albarkatun ɗanyen kayan aiki (McIntyre ya zama sananne a cikin rikice-rikicen da ba a saba da su ba game da tsarin zanen hockey na paleoclimate da aka nuna a cikin Rahoton Ƙimar Na Uku na IPCC na 2001). Jones ya ce da farko ya yi ƙoƙarin saduwa da buƙatun McIntyre, amma nan da nan ya cika da buƙatun da ba zai iya cikawa ba saboda lokaci ko ƙaƙƙarfan sirri, kuma ya fara ƙin buƙatun.Heffernan, O. (2009). "Climate data spat intensifies". Nature. 460 (7257): 787. doi:10.1038/460787a. PMID 19675615.

Heffernan, Olive (12 August 2009). "McIntyre versus Jones: climate data row escalates". Climate Feedback. Nature Climate Change. Retrieved 2 August 2011.

Pearce, Fred (2010), The Climate Files: The Battle for the Truth About Global Warming, Random House UK, pp. 143–156, ISBN 978-0-85265-229-9

Sabuwar Dokar 'Yancin Bayanai ta Burtaniya ta fara aiki a cikin 2005, kuma a cikin Fabrairu na wannan shekarar Jones ya tattauna da 'yan uwan ​​masu binciken yanayi yuwuwar tasirin dokar don buƙatun McIntyre. A cikin 2007 ya gaya wa abokan aikinsa cewa, ganin abin da McIntyre's Climate Audit blog ke yi, UEA ta yi watsi da buƙatun FOIA masu alaƙa da shafin yanar gizon. Masanan kimiyyar da abin ya shafa sun ga irin waɗannan buƙatun kamar ɓata lokacin da ake samu don aikinsu, da waɗanda ke sanya su a matsayin masu ƙorafi don dacewa da ajanda maimakon ƙoƙarin haɓaka ilimin kimiyya. A ƙarshen 2008, manajojin FOI na jami'a sun ɗauki shawara daga Ofishin Kwamishinan Watsa Labarai (ICO) akan keɓanta da barin ƙin buƙatun.letter to Jonathan Jones, and "Freedom of Information Act 2000 (Section 50) Environmental Information Regulations 2004 Decision Notice". FER0282488. ICO. 23 June 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 July 2011. Retrieved 15 August 2011. FOI request made 24 July 2009, refused by UEA 14 August 2009.

 Manazarta